> By the way, locally, I now have just over half the ASan test suite > passing ARM-Linux via QEMU.Greg, Do you mean that you've added support for QEMU-based testing to sanitizer CMakeLists? That would be super-cool. -Y
> Do you mean that you've added support for > QEMU-based testing to sanitizer CMakeLists?Yes. I'm up to 75% of ASan's test suite passing now. Most of the remaining failures are 1-off line numbers in the stack traces. Greg On Wednesday, April 2, 2014, Yury Gribov <y.gribov at samsung.com> wrote:> By the way, locally, I now have just over half the ASan test suite >> passing ARM-Linux via QEMU. >> > > Greg, > > Do you mean that you've added support for QEMU-based testing to sanitizer > CMakeLists? That would be super-cool. > > -Y >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140403/a93e770b/attachment.html>
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote:> > Do you mean that you've added support for > > QEMU-based testing to sanitizer CMakeLists? > > Yes. I'm up to 75% of ASan's test suite passing now. Most of the > remaining failures are 1-off line numbers in the stack traces.Weird. Does it mean that debug info is inaccurate?> > Greg > > > On Wednesday, April 2, 2014, Yury Gribov <y.gribov at samsung.com> wrote: > >> By the way, locally, I now have just over half the ASan test suite >>> passing ARM-Linux via QEMU. >>> >> >> Greg, >> >> Do you mean that you've added support for QEMU-based testing to sanitizer >> CMakeLists? That would be super-cool. >> >> -Y >> >-- Alexey Samsonov, MSK -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140404/9e5eab45/attachment.html>