llvm dev - Mar 2014 - [LLVMdev] [polly] adding a polly build-bot running on windows

Hi Tobi,

I'm familiar with Zorg, but sometimes people have plans for existing 
bots I might not be aware of.

Are there specific bots for linux/windows I should add this to, or 
should I leave the existing polly bots alone and create one or two new ones?

Of course, Any change would be backward compatible to all other users of 
the builder.

The plan would be have linux and windows cmake builds with isl only, and 
imath.

Rick

On 03/14/2014 01:43 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 03/14/2014 05:34 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
>> Hi Rick, Tobi,
>>
>> now that we have a way to link polly statically into the tools, we 
>> can turn on
>> the windows polly build-bot.
>>
>> Let's speak about the config that the bot will run: ISL only (no 
>> CLooG), imath
>> as a replacement for GMP, and cmake to configure llvm. The compiler 
>> will be MSVC
>> 2013: we have verified that the current ISL version with the two 
>> patches that I
>> sent out for ISL are compiling with MSVC 2013.  Anything else that I 
>> am missing?
>> Tobi, does this look like an interesting config for the build-bots?
>
> Perfect, wonderful. Do you need any help in setting this up?
>
> Tobias
>

On 03/14/2014 09:17 PM, Rick Foos wrote:
> Hi Tobi,
>
> I'm familiar with Zorg, but sometimes people have plans for existing
> bots I might not be aware of.
>
> Are there specific bots for linux/windows I should add this to, or
> should I leave the existing polly bots alone and create one or two new
> ones?
There is a set of existing linux buildslave, but I do not see how you 
can add a windows buildbot to them. I assumed you would just setup a 
windows buildslave and run a new polly buildbot on it.
> Of course, Any change would be backward compatible to all other users of
> the builder.
What kind of changes would you need to make?
> The plan would be have linux and windows cmake builds with isl only, and
> imath.
Sounds good. I am happy to review patches.

Tobias

On 03/14/14 18:12, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 03/14/2014 09:17 PM, Rick Foos wrote:
>> Hi Tobi,
>>
>> I'm familiar with Zorg, but sometimes people have plans for
existing
>> bots I might not be aware of.
>>
>> Are there specific bots for linux/windows I should add this to, or
>> should I leave the existing polly bots alone and create one or two new
>> ones?
>
> There is a set of existing linux buildslave, but I do not see how you 
> can add a windows buildbot to them. I assumed you would just setup a 
> windows buildslave and run a new polly buildbot on it.
>
Yes, I agree, a new builder for windows. We have a windows buildslave 
ready to connect.
>> Of course, Any change would be backward compatible to all other users
of
>> the builder.
>
> What kind of changes would you need to make?
Sometimes the addition of an option can be done rather than a whole new 
builder.
>
>> The plan would be have linux and windows cmake builds with isl only,
and
>> imath.
>
> Sounds good. I am happy to review patches.
Many thanks. There seems to be a problem with our hexagon clang build, 
and then we will have something put together soon.
>
> Tobias
>