Alexey Samsonov
2014-Feb-12 13:21 UTC
[LLVMdev] Heads-up: changing the structure of compiler-rt source tree
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:56 PM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:> Are you going to move the unwind library there as part of the > reorganisation? >No.> > David > > On 11 Feb 2014, at 09:59, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > compiler-rt is now not only a libgcc replacement for different > platforms, there are sanitizer and profile runtimes as well. I plan to move > the files as follows during this week: > > > > 1. libraries: > > a) all libgcc replacement stuff moves from "/lib" to "/lib/core" (the > name sucks, please suggest alternatives). Same for platform-specific code: > "/lib/arm/"->"/lib/core/arm", "/lib/i386"->"/lib/core/i386" etc. > > b) "/BlocksRuntime"->"/lib/BlocksRuntime" > > c) "/lib/sanitizer_common", "/lib/xsan", "/lib/profile" are not moved. > > > > 2. tests: > > all tests (lit tests and unit tests) are moved from directories under > "/lib" to "/test" to be consistent with LLVM/Clang test subtrees. > > > > See the original mail from Chandler for the overview of compiler-rt tree > current state and suggestion to change its structure: > > > http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Sanitizers-libs-in-Compiler-RT-tp4037520p4037567.html > > > > Please speak up if you disagree with this. > > > > -- > > Alexey Samsonov, MSK > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >-- Alexey Samsonov, MSK -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140212/0eb4d4cf/attachment.html>
David Chisnall
2014-Feb-12 13:22 UTC
[LLVMdev] Heads-up: changing the structure of compiler-rt source tree
On 12 Feb 2014, at 13:21, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote:> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:56 PM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: >> Are you going to move the unwind library there as part of the reorganisation? > > No.Given that the consensus appeared to be that this is where it belongs... why not? It seems strange to do a big reorganisation pass, but not do all of it. David
Alexey Samsonov
2014-Feb-12 14:12 UTC
[LLVMdev] Heads-up: changing the structure of compiler-rt source tree
Hi David, On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:22 PM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:> On 12 Feb 2014, at 13:21, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:56 PM, David Chisnall < > David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > >> Are you going to move the unwind library there as part of the > reorganisation? > > > > No. > > Given that the consensus appeared to be that this is where it belongs... > why not? It seems strange to do a big reorganisation pass, but not do all > of it.To be honest, I haven't worked with the unwind library. I'm fine with moving it to compiler-rt, but this should probably be done by someone with a sufficient knowledge of the library and/or its use cases. I'd be glad to provide any help, though. -- Alexey Samsonov, MSK -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140212/e339128e/attachment.html>