Manuel Jacob
2014-Feb-06 15:32 UTC
[LLVMdev] Pushing Bug 16725 - Inefficient code generated for i64 * i64 -> i128 multiplication in loop
Hi, I filed this bug half a year ago and it seems like nobody has looked into it yet. Should I send the patch to llvm-commits? I'd prefer to discuss it here or in the bugtracker, since I'm not subscribed to llvm-commits. Link: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16725 -Manuel
Hal Finkel
2014-Feb-06 15:54 UTC
[LLVMdev] Pushing Bug 16725 - Inefficient code generated for i64 * i64 -> i128 multiplication in loop
----- Original Message -----> From: "Manuel Jacob" <me at manueljacob.de> > To: LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 9:32:56 AM > Subject: [LLVMdev] Pushing Bug 16725 - Inefficient code generated for i64 * i64 -> i128 multiplication in loop > > Hi, > > I filed this bug half a year ago and it seems like nobody has looked > into it yet. Should I send the patch to llvm-commits? I'd prefer to > discuss it here or in the bugtracker, since I'm not subscribed to > llvm-commits.Yes, please send the patch to llvm-commits for review. Alternatively, you can submit the patch for review online using Phabricator (http://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html). Make sure that, as mentioned in the instructions, you add llvm-commits to the cc list from the web page. Even if you use Phabricator, however, you'll still need to watch the list closely for responses. Not all of the e-mail responses are properly mirrored in Phabricator. -Hal> > Link: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16725 > > -Manuel > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >-- Hal Finkel Assistant Computational Scientist Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory