llvm dev - Jan 2014 - [LLVMdev] Build-bot host compiler upgrades and C++11!

Hi Chandler,

I'm still migrating our bots, there were some complications. Can it wait
until next week?

cheers,
--renato


On 13 January 2014 22:00, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote:
> FYI, this is happening now-ish!
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at
gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Greetings, starting a new thread and CC-ing all the folks I could think
>> of that are likely running bots for LLVM. If I've missed any,
sorry, please
>> add them.
>>
>> As lots of folks have been mentioning, it's time to switch LLVM
(and most
>> subprojects) to use C++11. The first step is establishing a new
baseline of
>> compiler versions that are supported[1]:
>>
>> MSVC 2012
>> GCC 4.7
>> Clang 3.1
>>
>> If you are helping to keep our build bot infrastructure running and
>> up-to-date, please check the host compiler versions and reply here if
>> you're going to have trouble upgrading. My rough plan based on
chatting
>> with some folks is to submit checks to cmake and configure on Monday to
>> produce an error on older toolchains without some flag to force old
>> toolchain support.
>>
>> So reply to this thread if you need more time, or if all your bots are
>> ready-to-go! Thanks a bunch!
>> -Chandler
>>
>>
>> [1]: Most of these compilers were available in the middle (June) of
2012,
>> and based on the planned 3.5 release time frame of the middle of 2014,
that
>> will mean a roughly two year spread of compiler releases. MSVC 2012 was
>> later, but the community seems comfortable with requiring the upgrade.
>> Also, these versions include very significant improvements that make
>> adopting C++11 features much more viable. This was discussed at some
length
>> on the mailing list, and I'm not really trying to re-open debate
here, just
>> reminding folks. =]
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140114/59f604c4/attachment.html>

I've already submitted the changes. I'll sync up with you on IRC and
work
out how best to proceed.


On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at
linaro.org>wrote:
> Hi Chandler,
>
> I'm still migrating our bots, there were some complications. Can it
wait
> until next week?
>
> cheers,
> --renato
>
>
> On 13 January 2014 22:00, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>> FYI, this is happening now-ish!
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at
gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings, starting a new thread and CC-ing all the folks I could
think
>>> of that are likely running bots for LLVM. If I've missed any,
sorry, please
>>> add them.
>>>
>>> As lots of folks have been mentioning, it's time to switch LLVM
(and
>>> most subprojects) to use C++11. The first step is establishing a
new
>>> baseline of compiler versions that are supported[1]:
>>>
>>> MSVC 2012
>>> GCC 4.7
>>> Clang 3.1
>>>
>>> If you are helping to keep our build bot infrastructure running and
>>> up-to-date, please check the host compiler versions and reply here
if
>>> you're going to have trouble upgrading. My rough plan based on
chatting
>>> with some folks is to submit checks to cmake and configure on
Monday to
>>> produce an error on older toolchains without some flag to force old
>>> toolchain support.
>>>
>>> So reply to this thread if you need more time, or if all your bots
are
>>> ready-to-go! Thanks a bunch!
>>> -Chandler
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]: Most of these compilers were available in the middle (June) of
>>> 2012, and based on the planned 3.5 release time frame of the middle
of
>>> 2014, that will mean a roughly two year spread of compiler
releases. MSVC
>>> 2012 was later, but the community seems comfortable with requiring
the
>>> upgrade. Also, these versions include very significant improvements
that
>>> make adopting C++11 features much more viable. This was discussed
at some
>>> length on the mailing list, and I'm not really trying to
re-open debate
>>> here, just reminding folks. =]
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140114/3aec6692/attachment.html>

On 01/14/2014 10:26 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> I've already submitted the changes. I'll sync up with you on IRC
and work
> out how best to proceed.
This also broke the qualcomm buildbot. I copied Rick who is in charge of it.

Tobias

On 01/14/2014 10:26 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> I've already submitted the changes. I'll sync up with you on IRC
and work
> out how best to proceed.
And the OpenBSD bot. I copied Brad, who is in charge of it.

Cheers,
Tobias