Hi, Even though people are talking about deprecating autoconf http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15242 shows that cmake builds are not really tested on the build bots. It would be nice to get more cmake coverage in bots before talking about deprecating autoconf. Thanks, ismail -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130527/a14313c6/attachment.html>
See http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16120 filed as part of the discussion on autoconf deprecation/removal. On May 27, 2013 7:23 AM, "İsmail Dönmez" <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote:> Hi, > > Even though people are talking about deprecating autoconf > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15242 shows that cmake builds are > not really tested on the build bots. > > It would be nice to get more cmake coverage in bots before talking about > deprecating autoconf. > > Thanks, > ismail > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130527/47ec2c75/attachment.html>
> It would be nice to get more cmake coverage in bots before talking about deprecating autoconf.+1 /Patrik Hägglund From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Ismail Dönmez Sent: den 27 maj 2013 16:20 To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: [LLVMdev] PR15242 and cmake Hi, Even though people are talking about deprecating autoconf http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15242 shows that cmake builds are not really tested on the build bots. It would be nice to get more cmake coverage in bots before talking about deprecating autoconf. Thanks, ismail -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130528/3a2af9b2/attachment.html>