On 13 May 2013 19:54, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:> Renato, what do you think? I am currently building it on a chromebook > to make sure if fixes the bootstrap, but that will take some time. >There's also the test that fails, which I have in my patch. It should fail to you too. Maybe we should also test armv5 on your test, to make sure the behaviour remains different (and documented). I'm applying your patch to my tree now and will let you know. cheers, --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130513/973fb29f/attachment.html>
> There's also the test that fails, which I have in my patch. It should fail > to you too.No, that test is using a bsd triple, so my patch doesn't change it. I don't know how the various BSDs implement this.> Maybe we should also test armv5 on your test, to make sure the behaviour > remains different (and documented).The current behavior (with and without the patch) is to error since we know that we need to produce a function call, but we don't have code to do it.> I'm applying your patch to my tree now and will let you know.Thanks, Rafael
On 13 May 2013 20:12, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:> No, that test is using a bsd triple, so my patch doesn't change it. I > don't know how the various BSDs implement this. >Makes sense. Please, commit. --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130513/5759de09/attachment.html>