Justin Holewinski
2013-Jan-11 13:09 UTC
[LLVMdev] New "NA" category for Target Feature Matrix in Code Generator documentation?
Does anyone object to adding a new "not applicable" category to the Target Feature Matrix in the Code Generator documentation? I'm updating it for NVPTX, and there are some features marked as "No support" that really just do not make sense for this target. For example, "JIT" and ".o file writing" are not applicable for PTX as it has no binary format, in-memory or otherwise. -- Thanks, Justin Holewinski -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130111/5c673ee5/attachment.html>
Sean Silva
2013-Jan-11 17:52 UTC
[LLVMdev] New "NA" category for Target Feature Matrix in Code Generator documentation?
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote:> Does anyone object to adding a new "not applicable" category to the Target > Feature Matrix in the Code Generator documentation? I'm updating it for > NVPTX, and there are some features marked as "No support" that really just > do not make sense for this target. > > For example, "JIT" and ".o file writing" are not applicable for PTX as it > has no binary format, in-memory or otherwise.This makes sense to me. -- Sean Silva
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [LLVMdev] Update PTX section in CodeGenerator.html
- [LLVMdev] PTX generation examples?
- [LLVMdev] [NVPTX] PTXAS - Unimplemented feature: labels as initial values
- [LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
- [LLVMdev] PTX generation examples?