On 3 January 2013 20:53, Michael Gottesman <mgottesman at apple.com> wrote:> All of our internal testers use LNT. LNT behind the scenes just calls the > Makefiles appropriately. So it would be impossible to get rid of the > makefile execution without gutting LNT as well = p. >Hi Michael, The idea was never to gut the makefiles or LNT, but to let all buildbots use LNT to call the makefiles, and not call them directly, as it happens with some of them. I think it's just a matter of "standardizing" who calls the makefiles, not change any significant behaviour in the test-suite. cheers, --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130103/e2a56633/attachment.html>
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:> On 3 January 2013 20:53, Michael Gottesman <mgottesman at apple.com> wrote: >> >> All of our internal testers use LNT. LNT behind the scenes just calls the >> Makefiles appropriately. So it would be impossible to get rid of the >> makefile execution without gutting LNT as well = p. > > > Hi Michael, > > The idea was never to gut the makefiles or LNT, but to let all buildbots use > LNT to call the makefiles, and not call them directly, as it happens with > some of them. > > I think it's just a matter of "standardizing" who calls the makefiles, not > change any significant behaviour in the test-suite.And/or standardizing the way the Makefiles are invoked so that it's the same as the way LNT invokes them. - David
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:> On 3 January 2013 20:53, Michael Gottesman <mgottesman at apple.com> wrote: >> >> All of our internal testers use LNT. LNT behind the scenes just calls the >> Makefiles appropriately. So it would be impossible to get rid of the >> makefile execution without gutting LNT as well = p. > > > Hi Michael, > > The idea was never to gut the makefiles or LNT, but to let all buildbots use > LNT to call the makefiles, and not call them directly, as it happens with > some of them. > > I think it's just a matter of "standardizing" who calls the makefiles, not > change any significant behaviour in the test-suite.Fair enough - you could write up a patch for the zorg repository to do this.
On 3 January 2013 21:29, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:> Fair enough - you could write up a patch for the zorg repository to do > this. >Wouldn't requiring every buildbot to use LNT achieve the same thing? --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130103/47cb78d9/attachment.html>