Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> writes:> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:31 PM, <dag at cray.com> wrote: >>> We should probably setup a GCC -Werror build bot if we are warning >>> clean for some sufficiently modern version of GCC. >> >> That would be nice. How can I help move such a thing along? > > We have a complete HowTo on the subject :) > <llvm.org/docs/HowToAddABuilder.html>Great! But if the system is going to be totally revamped is it better to wait until that is done? -David
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:23 AM, <dag at cray.com> wrote:> Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> writes: > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:31 PM, <dag at cray.com> wrote: > >>> We should probably setup a GCC -Werror build bot if we are warning > >>> clean for some sufficiently modern version of GCC. > >> > >> That would be nice. How can I help move such a thing along? > > > > We have a complete HowTo on the subject :) > > <llvm.org/docs/HowToAddABuilder.html> > > Great! But if the system is going to be totally revamped is it better > to wait until that is done? >Nope. If you want it then sooner is always better than later. Also keep in mind that some warnings are only enabled with optimization when building with gcc. -eric -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130103/1d2b0107/attachment.html>
Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> writes:> Nope. If you want it then sooner is always better than later.Ok.> Also keep in mind that some warnings are only enabled with > optimization when building with gcc.Yep. I have a quad-core machine. Can I put two buildslaves on it, each doing a -j2 build? -David