thr3ads.net - llvm dev - [LLVMdev] scalarrepl fails to promote array of vector [Mar 2012]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Fan Dawei

2012-Mar-10 17:34 UTC

[LLVMdev] scalarrepl fails to promote array of vector

Hi all,

I want to use scalarrepl pass to eliminate the allocation of mat_alloc
which is of type [4 x <4 x float>] in the following program.

$cat test.ll

; ModuleID = 'test.ll'

define void @main(<4 x float>* %inArg, <4 x float>* %outArg, [4 x
<4 x
float>]* %constants) nounwind {
entry:
  %inArg1 = load <4 x float>* %inArg
  %mat_alloc = alloca [4 x <4 x float>]
  %matVal = load [4 x <4 x float>]* %constants
  store [4 x <4 x float>] %matVal, [4 x <4 x float>]* %mat_alloc
  %0 = getelementptr inbounds [4 x <4 x float>]* %mat_alloc, i32 0, i32 0
  %1 = load <4 x float>* %0
  %2 = fmul <4 x float> %1, %inArg1
  %3 = getelementptr inbounds [4 x <4 x float>]* %mat_alloc, i32 0, i32 1
  %4 = load <4 x float>* %3
  %5 = fmul <4 x float> %4, %inArg1
  %6 = fadd <4 x float> %2, %5
  %7 = getelementptr inbounds [4 x <4 x float>]* %mat_alloc, i32 0, i32 2
  %8 = load <4 x float>* %7
  %9 = fmul <4 x float> %8, %inArg1
  %10 = fadd <4 x float> %6, %9
  %11 = getelementptr inbounds [4 x <4 x float>]* %mat_alloc, i32 0, i32 3
  %12 = load <4 x float>* %11
  %13 = fadd <4 x float> %10, %12
  %14 = getelementptr <4 x float>* %outArg, i32 1
  store <4 x float> %13, <4 x float>* %14
  ret void
}

$ opt -S -stats -scalarrepl test.ll

No transformation is performed. I've examined the source code of
scalarrepl. It seems this pass does not handle array allocations. Is there
other transformation pass I can use to eliminate this allocation?

Thanks,
David
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120310/655a4200/attachment.html>

Chris Lattner

2012-Mar-10 21:22 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] scalarrepl fails to promote array of vector

On Mar 10, 2012, at 9:34 AM, Fan Dawei wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I want to use scalarrepl pass to eliminate the allocation of mat_alloc
which is of type [4 x <4 x float>] in the following program.
> 
> $cat test.ll
> 
> ; ModuleID = 'test.ll'
> 
> define void @main(<4 x float>* %inArg, <4 x float>* %outArg, [4
x <4 x float>]* %constants) nounwind {
> entry:
>   %inArg1 = load <4 x float>* %inArg
>   %mat_alloc = alloca [4 x <4 x float>]
>   %matVal = load [4 x <4 x float>]* %constants
>   store [4 x <4 x float>] %matVal, [4 x <4 x float>]*
%mat_alloc
>   %0 = getelementptr inbounds [4 x <4 x float>]* %mat_alloc, i32 0,
i32 0
>   %1 = load <4 x float>* %0
>   %2 = fmul <4 x float> %1, %inArg1
>   %3 = getelementptr inbounds [4 x <4 x float>]* %mat_alloc, i32 0,
i32 1
>   %4 = load <4 x float>* %3
>   %5 = fmul <4 x float> %4, %inArg1
>   %6 = fadd <4 x float> %2, %5
>   %7 = getelementptr inbounds [4 x <4 x float>]* %mat_alloc, i32 0,
i32 2
>   %8 = load <4 x float>* %7
>   %9 = fmul <4 x float> %8, %inArg1
>   %10 = fadd <4 x float> %6, %9
>   %11 = getelementptr inbounds [4 x <4 x float>]* %mat_alloc, i32 0,
i32 3
>   %12 = load <4 x float>* %11
>   %13 = fadd <4 x float> %10, %12
>   %14 = getelementptr <4 x float>* %outArg, i32 1
>   store <4 x float> %13, <4 x float>* %14
>   ret void
> } 
> 
> $ opt -S -stats -scalarrepl test.ll 
> 
> No transformation is performed. I've examined the source code of
scalarrepl. It seems this pass does not handle array allocations. Is there other
transformation pass I can use to eliminate this allocation?
Hi David,

ScalarRepl gets shy about loads and stores of the entire aggregate:
>   %matVal = load [4 x <4 x float>]* %constants
>   store [4 x <4 x float>] %matVal, [4 x <4 x float>]*
%mat_alloc
It is possible to generalize scalarrepl to handle these similar to the way it
handles memcpy, but noone has done that yet.  Also, it's not generally
recommended to do stuff like this, because you'll get inefficient code from
many parts of the optimizer and code generator.

-Chris

Fan Dawei

2012-Mar-12 03:35 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] scalarrepl fails to promote array of vector

Hi Chris,

Thanks for your reply.

You said that scalarRepl gets shy about loads and stores of the entire
aggregate. Then I use a test case:

; ModuleID = 'test1.ll'
define i32 @fun(i32* nocapture %X, i32 %i) nounwind uwtable readonly {
  %stackArray = alloca <4 x i32>
  %XC = bitcast i32* %X to <4 x i32>*
  %arrayVal = load <4 x i32>* %XC
  store <4 x i32> %arrayVal, <4 x i32>* %stackArray
  %arrayVal1 = load <4 x i32>* %stackArray
  %1 = extractelement <4 x i32> %arrayVal1, i32 1
  ret i32 %1
}

$ opt -S -stats -scalarrepl test1.ll
; ModuleID = 'test1.ll'

define i32 @fun(i32* nocapture %X, i32 %i) nounwind uwtable readonly {
  %XC = bitcast i32* %X to <4 x i32>*
  %arrayVal = load <4 x i32>* %XC
  %1 = extractelement <4 x i32> %arrayVal, i32 1
  ret i32 %1
}
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------==  
... Statistics Collected ...
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------==
1 mem2reg    - Number of alloca's promoted with a single store
1 scalarrepl - Number of allocas promoted

You can see that the stackArray is eliminated, although there is loads and
stores of the entire aggregate.

However, the optimised code is still not optimal. I want the code just load
one element from X instead of the whole array.

Thanks,
David





On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>
wrote:
>
> On Mar 10, 2012, at 9:34 AM, Fan Dawei wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I want to use scalarrepl pass to eliminate the allocation of mat_alloc
> which is of type [4 x <4 x float>] in the following program.
> >
> > $cat test.ll
> >
> > ; ModuleID = 'test.ll'
> >
> > define void @main(<4 x float>* %inArg, <4 x float>*
%outArg, [4 x <4 x
> float>]* %constants) nounwind {
> > entry:
> >   %inArg1 = load <4 x float>* %inArg
> >   %mat_alloc = alloca [4 x <4 x float>]
> >   %matVal = load [4 x <4 x float>]* %constants
> >   store [4 x <4 x float>] %matVal, [4 x <4 x float>]*
%mat_alloc
> >   %0 = getelementptr inbounds [4 x <4 x float>]* %mat_alloc, i32
0, i32 0
> >   %1 = load <4 x float>* %0
> >   %2 = fmul <4 x float> %1, %inArg1
> >   %3 = getelementptr inbounds [4 x <4 x float>]* %mat_alloc, i32
0, i32 1
> >   %4 = load <4 x float>* %3
> >   %5 = fmul <4 x float> %4, %inArg1
> >   %6 = fadd <4 x float> %2, %5
> >   %7 = getelementptr inbounds [4 x <4 x float>]* %mat_alloc, i32
0, i32 2
> >   %8 = load <4 x float>* %7
> >   %9 = fmul <4 x float> %8, %inArg1
> >   %10 = fadd <4 x float> %6, %9
> >   %11 = getelementptr inbounds [4 x <4 x float>]* %mat_alloc,
i32 0, i32
> 3
> >   %12 = load <4 x float>* %11
> >   %13 = fadd <4 x float> %10, %12
> >   %14 = getelementptr <4 x float>* %outArg, i32 1
> >   store <4 x float> %13, <4 x float>* %14
> >   ret void
> > }
> >
> > $ opt -S -stats -scalarrepl test.ll
> >
> > No transformation is performed. I've examined the source code of
> scalarrepl. It seems this pass does not handle array allocations. Is there
> other transformation pass I can use to eliminate this allocation?
>
> Hi David,
>
> ScalarRepl gets shy about loads and stores of the entire aggregate:
>
> >   %matVal = load [4 x <4 x float>]* %constants
> >   store [4 x <4 x float>] %matVal, [4 x <4 x float>]*
%mat_alloc
>
> It is possible to generalize scalarrepl to handle these similar to the way
> it handles memcpy, but noone has done that yet.  Also, it's not
generally
> recommended to do stuff like this, because you'll get inefficient code
from
> many parts of the optimizer and code generator.
>
> -Chris
>
>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120312/eed446ef/attachment.html>

Possibly Parallel Threads

Search for more maybe matching threads

llvm dev - Mar 2012 - [LLVMdev] scalarrepl fails to promote array of vector

[LLVMdev] scalarrepl fails to promote array of vector

[LLVMdev] scalarrepl fails to promote array of vector

[LLVMdev] scalarrepl fails to promote array of vector

Possibly Parallel Threads