llvm dev - Feb 2012 - [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc compilation and ConstantArray::getAsString

Hello there


I'm trying to compile llvm-gcc, but the compilation fails. This is due to
the fact that the ConstantArray class does no longer have the getAsString
method.

It has been actually removed on Jan 31 (commit
6a89228faca4b30c4abc29b5dec98bdac011ea4c).

Is there a patch for llvm-gcc which overcomes this problem? I've just
svn-updated my working copy but it didn't change anything.


Regards

-- 
    Giovanni [dacav] Simoni
    <giovanni.simoni at roundhousecode.com>
    <simgidacav at gmail.com>

Hi Giovanni,
> I'm trying to compile llvm-gcc, but the compilation fails. This is due
to
> the fact that the ConstantArray class does no longer have the getAsString
> method.
llvm-gcc is dead.  Please use dragonegg (which is analogous to llvm-gcc, but for
gcc-4.5/gcc-4.6) or clang instead.

Ciao, Duncan.

Le 17 févr. 2012 à 16:22, Giovanni [dacav] Simoni a écrit :
> Hello there
> 
> 
> I'm trying to compile llvm-gcc, but the compilation fails. This is due
to
> the fact that the ConstantArray class does no longer have the getAsString
> method.
> 
> It has been actually removed on Jan 31 (commit
> 6a89228faca4b30c4abc29b5dec98bdac011ea4c).
> 
> Is there a patch for llvm-gcc which overcomes this problem? I've just
> svn-updated my working copy but it didn't change anything.
> 
llvm-gcc is obsolete and not maintained for some time now.
please, switch to clang or dragon-egg.

-- Jean-Daniel

> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at
cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Giovanni [dacav] Simoni
> Subject: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc compilation and ConstantArray::getAsString
> I'm trying to compile llvm-gcc
> I've just svn-updated my working copy but it didn't change
anything.
Perhaps you missed this in the 3.0 release notes from back in December:

"LLVM 3.0 no longer includes support for the llvm-gcc frontend"

Clang and Dragonegg are the replacements.

 - Chuck


THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its
attachments from all computers.

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 04:52:38PM +0100, Duncan Sands
wrote:
> llvm-gcc is dead.  Please use dragonegg (which is analogous to llvm-gcc,
but for
> gcc-4.5/gcc-4.6) or clang instead.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 04:56:29PM +0100, Jean-Daniel Dupas
wrote:
> Le 17 févr. 2012 à 16:22, Giovanni [dacav] Simoni a écrit :
> llvm-gcc is obsolete and not maintained for some time now.
> please, switch to clang or dragon-egg.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:04:04AM -0600, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
> Perhaps you missed this in the 3.0 release notes from back in December:
> 
> "LLVM 3.0 no longer includes support for the llvm-gcc frontend"
> 
> Clang and Dragonegg are the replacements.
> 
>  - Chuck
Ok, thanks everyone :-)

-- 
    Giovanni [dacav] Simoni
    <giovanni.simoni at roundhousecode.com>
    <simgidacav at gmail.com>