Taewook Oh
2010-Sep-02 20:16 UTC
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] LoopDependenceAnalysis based on a FunctionPass
Hello, I found that LDA implemented on a function pass is much more useful than LDA based on a loop pass. In addition, I want to have an analysis result for the outer loops also, even if it would be a very conservative one. Can I commit my modified version of LDA? If you think it is worth to keep current LDA, what about adding a LDA based on function pass to the repository with some other name (e.g. LDAFP or something)? --Taewook -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: LoopDependenceAnalysis.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 12421 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100902/8338e296/attachment.bin>
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [LLVMdev] Problem with LoopDependenceAnalysis
- [LLVMdev] Problem with LoopDependenceAnalysis
- [ThinLTO] assert(GS != DefinedGlobals.end()) failed in FunctionImport.cpp
- [ThinLTO] assert(GS != DefinedGlobals.end()) failed in FunctionImport.cpp
- [ThinLTO] assert(GS != DefinedGlobals.end()) failed in FunctionImport.cpp