llvm dev - Jun 2010 - [LLVMdev] clang build fails if done in the separate object directory

I've built clang+llvm in an object directory successfully, and I'm
sure others have.  I'd guess the problem is the symlink, so I'd give
it a shot without it.

Reid

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Diego Iastrubni <diegoiast at gmail.com>
wrote:
> can you tell what commands exactly did you use?
>
> What I usually do is:
>
> svn co llvm...
> mkdir llvm/tools/clang
> svn co llvm/tools/clang
>
> mkdir cmake-build
> cd cmake-build
> cmake ../
> make
>
> Try something similar by running "../configure", it should work.
>
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Yuri <yuri at rawbw.com> wrote:
>>
>> I did these steps:
>> * checked out llvm trunk, and clang trunk
>> * created symbolic link llvm/tools/clang
>> * created separate folder: llvm-objects
>> * run configure and gmake in llvm-objects
>>
>> It builds ok until it hits clang, at which point I get an this error:
>> gmake[2]: Entering directory
`/tmp/llvm-svn/llvm-objects/tools/clang'
>> Makefile:44: Makefile.config: No such file or directory
>> Makefile:127: /Makefile.rules: No such file or directory
>> gmake[2]: *** No rule to make target `/Makefile.rules'.  Stop.
>> gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/llvm-svn/llvm-objects/tools/clang'
>> gmake[1]: *** [clang/.makeinstall] Error 2
>> gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/llvm-svn/llvm-objects/tools'
>> gmake: *** [install] Error 1
>>
>> Yuri
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>

On 10/06/10 17:35, Reid Kleckner wrote:
> I've built clang+llvm in an object directory successfully, and I'm
> sure others have.  I'd guess the problem is the symlink, so I'd
give
> it a shot without it.
I use a symbolic link to clang and never had any trouble with it...

Ciao,

Duncan.

On 06/10/2010 08:35, Reid Kleckner wrote:
> I've built clang+llvm in an object directory successfully, and I'm
> sure others have.  I'd guess the problem is the symlink, so I'd
give
> it a shot without it.
>
> Reid
No, clang isn't built in the object directory, even without symlink
Do I need to run 'mkdir llvm-objects/tools/clang' and configure there 
separately ?

Yuri

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Yuri <yuri at rawbw.com>
wrote:
> On 06/10/2010 08:35, Reid Kleckner wrote:
>> I've built clang+llvm in an object directory successfully, and
I'm
>> sure others have.  I'd guess the problem is the symlink, so I'd
give
>> it a shot without it.
>>
>> Reid
>
> No, clang isn't built in the object directory, even without symlink
> Do I need to run 'mkdir llvm-objects/tools/clang' and configure
there
> separately ?
>
> Yuri
No  you should be able to just configure, since you originally checked
out llvm twice you should actually checkout clang and then reconfigure
the whole thing.