On 20 March 2010 16:42, Russell Wallace <russell.wallace at gmail.com> wrote:> With Microsoft C++ (Windows Vista, 32-bit): > > LLVM 2.7 compiles (via cmake) without a hitch. > > I can't test it with my own code yet, will need to port from 2.6 to 2.7 > first. > > I was going to try running Kaleidoscope as a test case, but it doesn't > get built by default the way it did in 2.6, and running nmake in the > Kaleidoscope directory performs no operation. Am I missing something > here? > > cmake doesn't recognize llvm-gcc, are there instructions for compiling > it with Microsoft C++? If so, I can try that next. >llvm-gcc only builds with gcc. Aaron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100320/3e64c6ac/attachment.html>
Ah, okay, thanks. Is the same true of Clang? On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote:> On 20 March 2010 16:42, Russell Wallace <russell.wallace at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> With Microsoft C++ (Windows Vista, 32-bit): >> >> LLVM 2.7 compiles (via cmake) without a hitch. >> >> I can't test it with my own code yet, will need to port from 2.6 to 2.7 >> first. >> >> I was going to try running Kaleidoscope as a test case, but it doesn't >> get built by default the way it did in 2.6, and running nmake in the >> Kaleidoscope directory performs no operation. Am I missing something >> here? >> >> cmake doesn't recognize llvm-gcc, are there instructions for compiling >> it with Microsoft C++? If so, I can try that next. > > llvm-gcc only builds with gcc. > Aaron >
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Russell Wallace <russell.wallace at gmail.com> wrote:> Ah, okay, thanks. Is the same true of Clang? >Clang builds with MSVC, though to build something you have to have a 'gcc' in your path to build the assembly that is produced.