On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Jon H <hantheman12 at hotmail.com> wrote:>>Whoops, sending it to to llvm list as well, freaking takes another ~70 >>seconds to do a reply to all instead of a reply to, headers still not >>following standards of every other list I have ever been on... > > Stop whining about the headers. It's getting old.It is also a rather massive inconvenience... I open an email on this tablet and I get a typing area underneath it, is responds to what the header says it should respond to, which is correct for my other 20+ mailing lists, but for this one I need to tap the To: field, draw out the first few letters of ll then it autocompletes the rest, then do the main section that is this. Doing a Reply-To takes even longer. It is just odd and inconsistent how this mailing list does not do what every other mailing list does. I see no reasoning why it does so, it somewhat makes sense for the commit list, but certainly not for a discussion list.
John Criswell
2009-Sep-24 20:10 UTC
[LLVMdev] Headers (Was Re: help with llvm make system)
OvermindDL1 wrote:> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Jon H <hantheman12 at hotmail.com> wrote: > >>> Whoops, sending it to to llvm list as well, freaking takes another ~70 >>> seconds to do a reply to all instead of a reply to, headers still not >>> following standards of every other list I have ever been on... >>> >> Stop whining about the headers. It's getting old. >> > > It is also a rather massive inconvenience... > I open an email on this tablet and I get a typing area underneath it, > is responds to what the header says it should respond to, which is > correct for my other 20+ mailing lists, but for this one I need to tap > the To: field, draw out the first few letters of ll then it > autocompletes the rest, then do the main section that is this. Doing > a Reply-To takes even longer. It is just odd and inconsistent how > this mailing list does not do what every other mailing list does. I > see no reasoning why it does so, it somewhat makes sense for the > commit list, but certainly not for a discussion list. >I believe the llvmdev headers used to provide a "Reply-To:" field to llvmdev. Has anyone changed this behavior, and if so, why? -- John T.> _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >
OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> writes: [snip]> It is just odd and inconsistent how this mailing list does not do what > every other mailing list does. I see no reasoning why it does so, it > somewhat makes sense for the commit list, but certainly not for a > discussion list.Use gmane to access the mailing list as if it were a newsgroup: http://www.gmane.org Apart from advantages such as not filling your mail inbox it will send the replies to llvm by default. -- Óscar
Chris Lattner
2009-Sep-24 20:31 UTC
[LLVMdev] Headers (Was Re: help with llvm make system)
On Sep 24, 2009, at 1:10 PM, John Criswell wrote:> OvermindDL1 wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Jon H <hantheman12 at hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>> Whoops, sending it to to llvm list as well, freaking takes >>>> another ~70 >>>> seconds to do a reply to all instead of a reply to, headers still >>>> not >>>> following standards of every other list I have ever been on... >>>> >>> Stop whining about the headers. It's getting old. >>> >> >> It is also a rather massive inconvenience... >> I open an email on this tablet and I get a typing area underneath it, >> is responds to what the header says it should respond to, which is >> correct for my other 20+ mailing lists, but for this one I need to >> tap >> the To: field, draw out the first few letters of ll then it >> autocompletes the rest, then do the main section that is this. Doing >> a Reply-To takes even longer. It is just odd and inconsistent how >> this mailing list does not do what every other mailing list does. I >> see no reasoning why it does so, it somewhat makes sense for the >> commit list, but certainly not for a discussion list. >> > I believe the llvmdev headers used to provide a "Reply-To:" field to > llvmdev. > > Has anyone changed this behavior, and if so, why?Yes, this was discussed back when it changed. -Chris
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:10 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote:> OvermindDL1 wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Jon H <hantheman12 at hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> Whoops, sending it to to llvm list as well, freaking takes another ~70 >>>> seconds to do a reply to all instead of a reply to, headers still not >>>> following standards of every other list I have ever been on... >>>> >>> Stop whining about the headers. It's getting old. >>> >> >> It is also a rather massive inconvenience... >> I open an email on this tablet and I get a typing area underneath it, >> is responds to what the header says it should respond to, which is >> correct for my other 20+ mailing lists, but for this one I need to tap >> the To: field, draw out the first few letters of ll then it >> autocompletes the rest, then do the main section that is this. Doing >> a Reply-To takes even longer. It is just odd and inconsistent how >> this mailing list does not do what every other mailing list does. I >> see no reasoning why it does so, it somewhat makes sense for the >> commit list, but certainly not for a discussion list. >> > I believe the llvmdev headers used to provide a "Reply-To:" field to > llvmdev. > > Has anyone changed this behavior, and if so, why?It did used to a few months back. It was purposefully removed because of some issues on the commit mailing list, I do not know why they changed it for the discussion mailing list though.