Is it possible to merger mingw32 and mingw64 with mingw, because we can distinguish them with arch(i386,amd64) 2009/8/15, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>:> Hello > >> I add solaris and pic16. >> And add support for mingw. > Mingw part is not ok. The proper rules should be: > > i[[3456789]]86-*-mingw32* => mingw32 > x86_64-*-mingw* => mingw64 > > -- > With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov > Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University >-- 从我的移动设备发送 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo
>> Mingw part is not ok. The proper rules should be: >> >> i[[3456789]]86-*-mingw32* => mingw32 >> x86_64-*-mingw* => mingw64I add support for pic16, // PIC16: pic16 Solaris, For the consistency and simplicity, and merge MinGW32 and MinGW64 to MinGW. And some change in Triple.cpp for the clang project. -- Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: triple.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 3223 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090815/089fa5cf/attachment.obj>
Notice!! sorry for that, the patch is incorrect, i attached the new one. -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: triple.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 3745 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090815/9429c396/attachment.obj>
Maybe Matching Threads
- [LLVMdev] Hi, people, I propose to move Debug and Object File related headers out of Support
- [LLVMdev] Lost target in Triple
- [LLVMdev] Hi, people, I propose to move Debug and Object File related headers out of Support
- The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default.
- The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default.