On Dec 13, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:> Per the developer policy, the LLVM file header is: > > // This file was developed by RANDOM NAME HERE and is distributed > under > // the University of Illinois Open Source License. See LICENSE.TXT for > // details. > > The continuing obvious problem is that this name is generally > meaningless > as time goes on. People leave the project, code gets replaced, and > 'ownership' changes. The current policy is that the person who > creates > the file touches it. > > Does anyone have a problem with changing this to: > > // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open > Source > // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. > > And leaving this whole business to our friendly version control system > (e.g. svn annotate), which has the perfect answer all the time?This sounds fine to me. As long as people keep themselves registered in CREDITS.txt the lookup from svn annotate to an email address is not that painful.
On Dec 13, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:> Per the developer policy, the LLVM file header is: > > // This file was developed by RANDOM NAME HERE and is distributed > under > // the University of Illinois Open Source License. See LICENSE.TXT for > // details. > > The continuing obvious problem is that this name is generally > meaningless > as time goes on. People leave the project, code gets replaced, and > 'ownership' changes. The current policy is that the person who > creates > the file touches it. > > Does anyone have a problem with changing this to: > > // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open > Source > // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. > > And leaving this whole business to our friendly version control system > (e.g. svn annotate), which has the perfect answer all the time? >My 0.02$CDN: I think it's fine. -bw
Per the developer policy, the LLVM file header is: // This file was developed by RANDOM NAME HERE and is distributed under // the University of Illinois Open Source License. See LICENSE.TXT for // details. The continuing obvious problem is that this name is generally meaningless as time goes on. People leave the project, code gets replaced, and 'ownership' changes. The current policy is that the person who creates the file touches it. Does anyone have a problem with changing this to: // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. And leaving this whole business to our friendly version control system (e.g. svn annotate), which has the perfect answer all the time? -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/
Fine with me too. On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 17:15 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:> Per the developer policy, the LLVM file header is: > > // This file was developed by RANDOM NAME HERE and is distributed under > // the University of Illinois Open Source License. See LICENSE.TXT for > // details. > > The continuing obvious problem is that this name is generally meaningless > as time goes on. People leave the project, code gets replaced, and > 'ownership' changes. The current policy is that the person who creates > the file touches it. > > Does anyone have a problem with changing this to: > > // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source > // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. > > And leaving this whole business to our friendly version control system > (e.g. svn annotate), which has the perfect answer all the time? > > -Chris >
> Does anyone have a problem with changing this to: > > // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois > Open Source // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. > > And leaving this whole business to our friendly version > control system (e.g. svn annotate), which has the perfect > answer all the time?Certainly I don't have a problem, I just want to point out a situation that might be a problem: Consider someone who submits a whole file, but doesn't have SVN commit access. So another one commits the file. When you now use "svn blame file", you'll see the name of the committer, not the name of the author.
Hi> > > Does anyone have a problem with changing this to: > > > > // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois > > Open Source // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. > > > > And leaving this whole business to our friendly version > > control system (e.g. svn annotate), which has the perfect > > answer all the time? > > Certainly I don't have a problem, I just want to point out a > situation that might be a problem: > > Consider someone who submits a whole file, but doesn't have SVN > commit access. So another one commits the file. When you now > use "svn blame file", you'll see the name of the committer, not > the name of the author.What about leaving an optional contributors line before/after the distribution text, e.g.: // Code in this file is contributed by: mmhjm dsse, jhiuiui hjh, and lkjaa dfdf, // and is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. - OR - // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. // Code in this file adheres to the licensing terms and is // contributed by: <List of authors> -Henrik.> _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev_________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20071216/2fed3fdd/attachment.html>
On Dec 13, 2007, at 11:47 PM, Holger Schurig wrote:>> Does anyone have a problem with changing this to: >> >> // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois >> Open Source // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. >> >> And leaving this whole business to our friendly version >> control system (e.g. svn annotate), which has the perfect >> answer all the time? > > Certainly I don't have a problem, I just want to point out a > situation that might be a problem: > > Consider someone who submits a whole file, but doesn't have SVN > commit access. So another one commits the file. When you now > use "svn blame file", you'll see the name of the committer, not > the name of the author.I don't think this will be a big problem in practice. The SVN commit for commits done by other people say "this code contributed by Whoever". Also, most people get commit access before contributing whole files. -Chris
On Dec 13, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:> > Per the developer policy, the LLVM file header is: > > // This file was developed by RANDOM NAME HERE and is distributed > under > // the University of Illinois Open Source License. See LICENSE.TXT for > // details. > > The continuing obvious problem is that this name is generally > meaningless > as time goes on. People leave the project, code gets replaced, and > 'ownership' changes. The current policy is that the person who > creates > the file touches it. > > Does anyone have a problem with changing this to: > > // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open > Source > // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. > > And leaving this whole business to our friendly version control system > (e.g. svn annotate), which has the perfect answer all the time?Ok. I'm going to make this change, thanks to all who responded. -Chris