Is anyone actively working on this currently? It's marked as unassigned in BZ. -- Christopher Lamb christopher.lamb at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070329/1edd4502/attachment.html>
On Mar 29, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Christopher Lamb wrote:> Is anyone actively working on this currently? It's marked as > unassigned in BZ.In next few days I'll get to this. At the moment I'm enabling Packed Structure support in llvm-gcc (based on patches developed by other llvm developers) and adding support for packed bit fields. As part of this work, alignment for LD/ST is required to access packed structure fields which are not aligned naturally. - Devang
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 14:24 -0500, Christopher Lamb wrote:> Is anyone actively working on this currently? It's marked as > unassigned in BZ.I don't think so. Reid.> > -- > Christopher Lamb > christopher.lamb at gmail.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
It would be really nice if llvm-as had some extra syntax to let other compilers specify the exact layout of a struct. Specifically, I'd like to specify what the byte offsets are for each field without having to insert phony fields. Would this extra functionality fit into your work at all? -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Devang Patel Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 12:49 PM To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] PR400 - alignment for LD/ST On Mar 29, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Christopher Lamb wrote:> Is anyone actively working on this currently? It's marked as > unassigned in BZ.In next few days I'll get to this. At the moment I'm enabling Packed Structure support in llvm-gcc (based on patches developed by other llvm developers) and adding support for packed bit fields. As part of this work, alignment for LD/ST is required to access packed structure fields which are not aligned naturally. - Devang _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Christopher, On Mar 29, 2007, at 12:49 PM, Devang Patel wrote:> > On Mar 29, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Christopher Lamb wrote: > >> Is anyone actively working on this currently? It's marked as >> unassigned in BZ. > > In next few days I'll get to this. At the moment I'm enabling Packed > Structure support in llvm-gcc (based on patches developed by other > llvm developers) and adding support for packed bit fields. As part of > this work, alignment for LD/ST is required to access packed structure > fields which are not aligned naturally.I get many distractions per day, so do not hesitate if you want to take care of PR 400 now. - Devang