Thanks all, I've incorporated all the feedback so far:
http://llvm.org/ChrisLLVM/projects/llvm-www/releases/1.8/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
-Chris
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Bil wrote:
> On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Here's the first draft of the LLVM 1.8 release notes. Please take
a look
>> and send me any comments or feedback you have:
>> http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
>>
> Trivial changes:
>
> * Most of LLVM is now built with "-pedantic", ensuring better
portability to
> more C++ Compilers.
>
> Probably should be "compilers"?
>
> * The PowerPC backend now includes initial 64-bit support. The JIT is not
> complete, and the static compiler has a couple of known bugs, but support
is
> mostly in place. LLVM 1.9 will include completed PPC-64 support.
>
> I would suggest "compete PPC-64 support" instead.
>
> * The -cee pass is known to be buggy, and may be removed in in a future
> release.
>
> Remove one of the "in"s.
>
> * The following Unix system functionality has not been tested and may not
> work:
>
> "functionalities have"
>
> * Zero arg vararg functions are not supported. This should not affect LLVM
> produced by the C or C++ frontends.
>
> This sentence confuses me. Should it be "LLVM bytecode" or some
other
> wording?
>
> -bw
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-Chris
--
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/