Henrik Bach
2004-Dec-31 20:41 UTC
[LLVMdev] I'm almost able to build a complete tool suite of LLVM.
Hi Chris, Jeff and Reid, Today, I was almost able to build a complete tool suite of LLVM in the MinGW environment. However, llvm-db and bugpoint couldn't build due to some non-win32 intrinsics. If we could iron these errors out, then I think we could tell to jeff and others, to setup a win32 VC-project to compile the tool suite. Any suggestions? Happy new year to you all. Henrik. ============================================================Henrik Bach Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ ============================================================ _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
Misha Brukman
2004-Dec-31 21:10 UTC
[LLVMdev] I'm almost able to build a complete tool suite of LLVM.
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 09:41:24PM +0100, Henrik Bach wrote:> Today, I was almost able to build a complete tool suite of LLVM in the > MinGW environment.Great!> However, llvm-db and bugpoint couldn't build due to some non-win32 > intrinsics. If we could iron these errors out, then I think we could > tell to jeff and others, to setup a win32 VC-project to compile the > tool suite.llvm-db and bugpoint currently cannot be ported to Win32 because they are built specificly with Unix-style process model, using fork() and such. As a result, to be compiled/ran on Win32, both llvm-db and bugpoint need some _nontrivial_ porting work, i.e. "rewriting". Note that they are both filtered out in llvm/tools/Makefile at this time. There is no short-term plan to port either one of them, unless someone steps up to the plate to work out the correct Win32 methods for implementing the services those tools depend upon, which is, again, not a simple job. For now, don't worry about building those tools, if you can build everything else, consider that a complete Win32 build. -- Misha Brukman :: http://misha.brukman.net :: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
Henrik Bach
2004-Dec-31 21:55 UTC
[LLVMdev] I'm almost able to build a complete tool suite of LLVM.
----Original Message Follows---- From: Misha Brukman <brukman at uiuc.edu> Reply-To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] I'm almost able to build a complete tool suite of LLVM. Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:10:47 -0600>Great!Thank you.>As a result, to be compiled/ran on Win32, both llvm-db and bugpoint need >some _nontrivial_ porting work, i.e. "rewriting". Note that they are >both filtered out in llvm/tools/Makefile at this time.No, that is not the case, due to my make tried to compile them. Otherwise, I wouldn't notice :)>For now, don't worry about building those tools, if you can build >everything else, consider that a complete Win32 build.That sounds good. Henrik. _________________________________________________________________ F� alle de nye og sjove ikoner med MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.dk/
Maybe Matching Threads
- [LLVMdev] I'm almost able to build a complete tool suite of LLVM.
- [LLVMdev] I'm almost able to build a complete tool suite of LLVM.
- [LLVMdev] The complete suite of llvm now compiles on mingw
- [LLVMdev] The complete suite of llvm now compiles on mingw
- [LLVMdev] I need some output and log files to trace down why my build fails