llvm dev - Dec 2004 - [LLVMdev]Undefinedreferenceto`llvm::sys::CopyFile(llvm::sys::Pathconst&, llvm::sys::P

I'll see what I can do. However, I have to balance your need for "big
bang" change with Chris' fervor for incremental changes. Making a huge
change makes his review task harder. There are only seven files to merge
so at most seven change sets. I'll probably get these done early next
week. Sorry for the hassle, but I want to get lib/System simple,
complete and working so I can forget about it and move on. I'll be done
with this by the new year.

Reid.

On Fri, 2004-12-24 at 08:06, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> And I had just fixed VC++ so that it *did* handle the dependencies with 
> platform correctly...  This means that each file in System you change to 
> eliminate the #include from platform will require a corresponding change 
> to System.vproj.  I'd appreciate it if you got it over with all at
once,
> otherwise VC++ support will be broken more often than not.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20041224/4d840424/attachment.sig>

Jeff/Chris,

So, I opted for the smallest "big bang" commit that made sense.
Hopefully this won't be too hard for Chris to review and yet it gets the
bulk of the lib/System changes over and done with.  Although you'll see
a log of commit messages, it turned out that the bulk of the remaining
lib/System work was "remove this useless file". There are still some
small improvements remaining to be made in lib/System this week but they
should be very incremental and affect only a couple files at a time. I
don't expect to be adding interface changes to include/llvm/System/*.h
nor changing the lib/System #inclusion hierarchy so the VC++ 7.1 stuff
should be safe to update based on the current CVS.

Hope this is satisfactory to you both.

Reid.


On Fri, 2004-12-24 at 09:30, Reid Spencer wrote:
> I'll see what I can do. However, I have to balance your need for
"big
> bang" change with Chris' fervor for incremental changes. Making a
huge
> change makes his review task harder. There are only seven files to merge
> so at most seven change sets. I'll probably get these done early next
> week. Sorry for the hassle, but I want to get lib/System simple,
> complete and working so I can forget about it and move on. I'll be done
> with this by the new year.
> 
> Reid.
> 
> On Fri, 2004-12-24 at 08:06, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> > And I had just fixed VC++ so that it *did* handle the dependencies
with
> > platform correctly...  This means that each file in System you change
to
> > eliminate the #include from platform will require a corresponding
change
> > to System.vproj.  I'd appreciate it if you got it over with all at
once,
> > otherwise VC++ support will be broken more often than not.
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20041227/50a965c6/attachment.sig>

I've updated the project files.

Reid Spencer wrote:
>Jeff/Chris,
>
>So, I opted for the smallest "big bang" commit that made sense.
>Hopefully this won't be too hard for Chris to review and yet it gets the
>bulk of the lib/System changes over and done with.  Although you'll see
>a log of commit messages, it turned out that the bulk of the remaining
>lib/System work was "remove this useless file". There are still
some
>small improvements remaining to be made in lib/System this week but they
>should be very incremental and affect only a couple files at a time. I
>don't expect to be adding interface changes to include/llvm/System/*.h
>nor changing the lib/System #inclusion hierarchy so the VC++ 7.1 stuff
>should be safe to update based on the current CVS.
>
>Hope this is satisfactory to you both.
>
>Reid.
>
>
>On Fri, 2004-12-24 at 09:30, Reid Spencer wrote:
>  
>
>>I'll see what I can do. However, I have to balance your need for
"big
>>bang" change with Chris' fervor for incremental changes. Making
a huge
>>change makes his review task harder. There are only seven files to merge
>>so at most seven change sets. I'll probably get these done early
next
>>week. Sorry for the hassle, but I want to get lib/System simple,
>>complete and working so I can forget about it and move on. I'll be
done
>>with this by the new year.
>>
>>Reid.
>>
>>On Fri, 2004-12-24 at 08:06, Jeff Cohen wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>And I had just fixed VC++ so that it *did* handle the dependencies
with
>>>platform correctly...  This means that each file in System you
change to
>>>eliminate the #include from platform will require a corresponding
change
>>>to System.vproj.  I'd appreciate it if you got it over with all
at once,
>>>otherwise VC++ support will be broken more often than not.
>>>      
>>>
>>______________________________________________________________________
>>_______________________________________________
>>LLVM Developers mailing list
>>LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>>http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>    
>>

On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Reid Spencer wrote:
> Jeff/Chris,
>
> So, I opted for the smallest "big bang" commit that made sense.
> Hopefully this won't be too hard for Chris to review and yet it gets
the
> bulk of the lib/System changes over and done with.  Although you'll see
The changes look great, thanks a lot Reid!

-Chris
> a log of commit messages, it turned out that the bulk of the remaining
> lib/System work was "remove this useless file". There are still
some
> small improvements remaining to be made in lib/System this week but they
> should be very incremental and affect only a couple files at a time. I
> don't expect to be adding interface changes to include/llvm/System/*.h
> nor changing the lib/System #inclusion hierarchy so the VC++ 7.1 stuff
> should be safe to update based on the current CVS.
>
> Hope this is satisfactory to you both.
>
> Reid.
>
>
> On Fri, 2004-12-24 at 09:30, Reid Spencer wrote:
>> I'll see what I can do. However, I have to balance your need for
"big
>> bang" change with Chris' fervor for incremental changes.
Making a huge
>> change makes his review task harder. There are only seven files to
merge
>> so at most seven change sets. I'll probably get these done early
next
>> week. Sorry for the hassle, but I want to get lib/System simple,
>> complete and working so I can forget about it and move on. I'll be
done
>> with this by the new year.
>>
>> Reid.
>>
>> On Fri, 2004-12-24 at 08:06, Jeff Cohen wrote:
>>> And I had just fixed VC++ so that it *did* handle the dependencies
with
>>> platform correctly...  This means that each file in System you
change to
>>> eliminate the #include from platform will require a corresponding
change
>>> to System.vproj.  I'd appreciate it if you got it over with all
at once,
>>> otherwise VC++ support will be broken more often than not.
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-Chris

-- 
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/