Dan Williams
2021-Sep-30 04:59 UTC
[PATCH v2 1/6] driver core: Move the "authorized" attribute from USB/Thunderbolt to core
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 7:39 PM Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy at linux.intel.com> wrote:> > > > On 9/29/21 6:55 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > >> Also, you ignored the usb_[de]authorize_interface() functions and > >> their friends. > > Ugh, yes. > > I did not change it because I am not sure about the interface vs device > dependency. >This is was the rationale for has_probe_authorization flag. USB performs authorization of child devices based on the authorization state of the parent interface.> I think following change should work. > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/driver.c b/drivers/usb/core/driver.c > index f57b5a7a90ca..84969732d09c 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/core/driver.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/driver.c > @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int usb_probe_interface(struct device *dev) > if (udev->dev.authorized == false) { > dev_err(&intf->dev, "Device is not authorized for usage\n"); > return error; > - } else if (intf->authorized == 0) { > + } else if (intf->dev.authorized == 0) {== false.> dev_err(&intf->dev, "Interface %d is not authorized for usage\n", > intf->altsetting->desc.bInterfaceNumber); > return error; > @@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ int usb_driver_claim_interface(struct usb_driver *driver, > return -EBUSY; > > /* reject claim if interface is not authorized */ > - if (!iface->authorized) > + if (!iface->dev.authorized)I'd do == false to keep it consistent with other conversions.> return -ENODEV; > > dev->driver = &driver->drvwrap.driver; > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/message.c b/drivers/usb/core/message.c > index 47548ce1cfb1..ab3c8d1e4db9 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/core/message.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/message.c > @@ -1791,9 +1791,9 @@ void usb_deauthorize_interface(struct usb_interface *intf) > > device_lock(dev->parent); > > - if (intf->authorized) { > + if (intf->dev.authorized) { > device_lock(dev); > - intf->authorized = 0; > + intf->dev.authorized = 0;= false;> device_unlock(dev); > > usb_forced_unbind_intf(intf); > @@ -1811,9 +1811,9 @@ void usb_authorize_interface(struct usb_interface *intf) > { > struct device *dev = &intf->dev; > > - if (!intf->authorized) { > + if (!intf->dev.authorized) { > device_lock(dev); > - intf->authorized = 1; /* authorize interface */ > + intf->dev.authorized = 1; /* authorize interface */= true ...not sure that comment is worth preserving.
Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-Sep-30 09:05 UTC
[PATCH v2 1/6] driver core: Move the "authorized" attribute from USB/Thunderbolt to core
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 6:59 AM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams at intel.com> wrote:> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 7:39 PM Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan > <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy at linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 9/29/21 6:55 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > >> Also, you ignored the usb_[de]authorize_interface() functions and > > >> their friends. > > > Ugh, yes. > > > > I did not change it because I am not sure about the interface vs device > > dependency. > > > > This is was the rationale for has_probe_authorization flag. USB > performs authorization of child devices based on the authorization > state of the parent interface. > > > I think following change should work. > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/driver.c b/drivers/usb/core/driver.c > > index f57b5a7a90ca..84969732d09c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/usb/core/driver.c > > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/driver.c > > @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int usb_probe_interface(struct device *dev) > > if (udev->dev.authorized == false) { > > dev_err(&intf->dev, "Device is not authorized for usage\n"); > > return error; > > - } else if (intf->authorized == 0) { > > + } else if (intf->dev.authorized == 0) { > > == falseOr even (!intf->dev.authorized).> > dev_err(&intf->dev, "Interface %d is not authorized for usage\n", > > intf->altsetting->desc.bInterfaceNumber); > > return error; > > @@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ int usb_driver_claim_interface(struct usb_driver *driver, > > return -EBUSY; > > > > /* reject claim if interface is not authorized */ > > - if (!iface->authorized) > > + if (!iface->dev.authorized) > > I'd do == false to keep it consistent with other conversions.But this looks odd, FWIW.