On 12.05.21 10:50, 'Joerg Roedel' wrote:> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:16:12AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> You want something like xen_safe_[read|write]_ulong().
>
> From a first glance I can't see it, what is the difference between the
> xen_safe_*_ulong() functions and __get_user()/__put_user()? The only
> difference I can see is that __get/__put_user() support different access
> sizes, but neither of those disables page-faults by itself, for example.
>
> Couldn't these xen-specific functions not also be replaces by
> __get_user()/__put_user()?
No, those were used before, but commit 9da3f2b7405440 broke Xen's use
case. That is why I did commit 1457d8cf7664f.
Juergen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 3091 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20210512/730858b1/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20210512/730858b1/attachment.sig>