David Hildenbrand
2021-Jan-20 11:14 UTC
[PATCH] virtio-mem: Assign boolean values to a bool variable
On 20.01.21 12:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:04:18AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 20.01.21 10:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:40:37AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> On 20.01.21 08:50, Jiapeng Zhong wrote: >>>>> Fix the following coccicheck warnings: >>>>> >>>>> ./drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c:2580:2-25: WARNING: Assignment >>>>> of 0/1 to bool variable. >>>>> >>>>> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci at linux.alibaba.com> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Zhong <abaci-bugfix at linux.alibaba.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 2 +- >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c >>>>> index 9fc9ec4..85a272c 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c >>>>> @@ -2577,7 +2577,7 @@ static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) >>>>> * actually in use (e.g., trying to reload the driver). >>>>> */ >>>>> if (vm->plugged_size) { >>>>> - vm->unplug_all_required = 1; >>>>> + vm->unplug_all_required = true; >>>>> dev_info(&vm->vdev->dev, "unplugging all memory is required\n"); >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> we already had a fix on the list for quite a while: >>>> >>>> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1609233239-60313-1-git-send-email-tiantao6 at hisilicon.com >>> >>> Can't find that one. >> >> Looks like it was only on virtualization@ and a couple of people on cc. >> >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/2020-December/051662.html >> >> Interestingly, I cannot find the follow-up ("[PATCH] virtio-mem: use >> boolean value when setting vm->unplug_all_required") in the mailing list >> archives, even though it has virtualization@ on cc. > > > Unsurprising that I didn't merge it then ;)Well, you were on cc ;)> Want to send your ack on this one?Sure Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com> -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-Jan-20 11:33 UTC
[PATCH] virtio-mem: Assign boolean values to a bool variable
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 12:14:14PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:> On 20.01.21 12:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:04:18AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > >> On 20.01.21 10:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:40:37AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > >>>> On 20.01.21 08:50, Jiapeng Zhong wrote: > >>>>> Fix the following coccicheck warnings: > >>>>> > >>>>> ./drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c:2580:2-25: WARNING: Assignment > >>>>> of 0/1 to bool variable. > >>>>> > >>>>> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci at linux.alibaba.com> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Zhong <abaci-bugfix at linux.alibaba.com> > >>>>> --- > >>>>> drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 2 +- > >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>>>> > >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c > >>>>> index 9fc9ec4..85a272c 100644 > >>>>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c > >>>>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c > >>>>> @@ -2577,7 +2577,7 @@ static int virtio_mem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > >>>>> * actually in use (e.g., trying to reload the driver). > >>>>> */ > >>>>> if (vm->plugged_size) { > >>>>> - vm->unplug_all_required = 1; > >>>>> + vm->unplug_all_required = true; > >>>>> dev_info(&vm->vdev->dev, "unplugging all memory is required\n"); > >>>>> } > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> we already had a fix on the list for quite a while: > >>>> > >>>> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1609233239-60313-1-git-send-email-tiantao6 at hisilicon.com > >>> > >>> Can't find that one. > >> > >> Looks like it was only on virtualization@ and a couple of people on cc. > >> > >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/2020-December/051662.html > >> > >> Interestingly, I cannot find the follow-up ("[PATCH] virtio-mem: use > >> boolean value when setting vm->unplug_all_required") in the mailing list > >> archives, even though it has virtualization@ on cc. > > > > > > Unsurprising that I didn't merge it then ;) > > Well, you were on cc ;)Hmm true. Found it now.> > Want to send your ack on this one? > > Sure > > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com>Added yours and the original Signed-off-by. Thanks!> > -- > Thanks, > > David / dhildenb