Jason Wang
2020-Jun-03 04:18 UTC
[PATCH 4/6] vhost_vdpa: support doorbell mapping via mmap
On 2020/6/2 ??9:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:> On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 02:49:38PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2020/6/2 ??12:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 03:22:49AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: >>>> Hi Jason, >>>> >>>> I love your patch! Yet something to improve: >>>> >>>> [auto build test ERROR on vhost/linux-next] >>>> [also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.7 next-20200529] >>>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help >>>> improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the >>>> base tree in git format-patch, please seehttps://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982] >>>> >>>> url:https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jason-Wang/vDPA-doorbell-mapping/20200531-070834 >>>> base:https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git linux-next >>>> config: m68k-randconfig-r011-20200601 (attached as .config) >>>> compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 >>>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): >>>> wgethttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross >>>> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross >>>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree >>>> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=m68k >>>> >>>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate >>>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot<lkp at intel.com> >>>> >>>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): >>>> >>>> drivers/vhost/vdpa.c: In function 'vhost_vdpa_fault': >>>>>> drivers/vhost/vdpa.c:754:22: error: implicit declaration of function 'pgprot_noncached' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >>>> 754 | vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vma->vm_page_prot); >>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>>>> drivers/vhost/vdpa.c:754:22: error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'pgprot_t' {aka 'struct <anonymous>'} from type 'int' >>>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors >>>> >>>> vim +/pgprot_noncached +754 drivers/vhost/vdpa.c >>>> >>>> 742 >>>> 743 static vm_fault_t vhost_vdpa_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf) >>>> 744 { >>>> 745 struct vhost_vdpa *v = vmf->vma->vm_file->private_data; >>>> 746 struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa; >>>> 747 const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config; >>>> 748 struct vdpa_notification_area notify; >>>> 749 struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma; >>>> 750 u16 index = vma->vm_pgoff; >>>> 751 >>>> 752 notify = ops->get_vq_notification(vdpa, index); >>>> 753 >>>> > 754 vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vma->vm_page_prot); >>>> 755 if (remap_pfn_range(vma, vmf->address & PAGE_MASK, >>>> 756 notify.addr >> PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_SIZE, >>>> 757 vma->vm_page_prot)) >>>> 758 return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS; >>>> 759 >>>> 760 return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE; >>>> 761 } >>>> 762 >>> Yes well, all this remapping clearly has no chance to work >>> on systems without CONFIG_MMU. >> >> It looks to me mmap can work according to Documentation/nommu-mmap.txt. But >> I'm not sure it's worth to bother. >> >> Thanks > > Well > > int remap_pfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, > unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size, pgprot_t prot) > { > if (addr != (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT)) > return -EINVAL; > > vma->vm_flags |= VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP | VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_DONTDUMP; > return 0; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(remap_pfn_range); > > > So things aren't going to work if you have a fixed PFN > which is the case of the hardware device.Looking at the implementation of some drivers e.g mtd_char. If I read the code correctly, we can do this by providing get_unmapped_area method and use physical address directly. But start form CONFIG_MMU should be fine.? Do you prefer making vhost_vdpa depends on CONFIG_MMU or just fail mmap when CONFIG_MMU is not configured? Thanks> > >>> >>>
Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-Jun-03 06:34 UTC
[PATCH 4/6] vhost_vdpa: support doorbell mapping via mmap
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 12:18:44PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:> > On 2020/6/2 ??9:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 02:49:38PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2020/6/2 ??12:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 03:22:49AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > > > Hi Jason, > > > > > > > > > > I love your patch! Yet something to improve: > > > > > > > > > > [auto build test ERROR on vhost/linux-next] > > > > > [also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.7 next-20200529] > > > > > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help > > > > > improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the > > > > > base tree in git format-patch, please seehttps://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982] > > > > > > > > > > url:https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jason-Wang/vDPA-doorbell-mapping/20200531-070834 > > > > > base:https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git linux-next > > > > > config: m68k-randconfig-r011-20200601 (attached as .config) > > > > > compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 > > > > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > > > > > wgethttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > > > > > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > > > > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > > > > > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=m68k > > > > > > > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > > > > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot<lkp at intel.com> > > > > > > > > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): > > > > > > > > > > drivers/vhost/vdpa.c: In function 'vhost_vdpa_fault': > > > > > > > drivers/vhost/vdpa.c:754:22: error: implicit declaration of function 'pgprot_noncached' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > > > 754 | vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vma->vm_page_prot); > > > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > > drivers/vhost/vdpa.c:754:22: error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'pgprot_t' {aka 'struct <anonymous>'} from type 'int' > > > > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > > > > > > > > > vim +/pgprot_noncached +754 drivers/vhost/vdpa.c > > > > > > > > > > 742 > > > > > 743 static vm_fault_t vhost_vdpa_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf) > > > > > 744 { > > > > > 745 struct vhost_vdpa *v = vmf->vma->vm_file->private_data; > > > > > 746 struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa; > > > > > 747 const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config; > > > > > 748 struct vdpa_notification_area notify; > > > > > 749 struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma; > > > > > 750 u16 index = vma->vm_pgoff; > > > > > 751 > > > > > 752 notify = ops->get_vq_notification(vdpa, index); > > > > > 753 > > > > > > 754 vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vma->vm_page_prot); > > > > > 755 if (remap_pfn_range(vma, vmf->address & PAGE_MASK, > > > > > 756 notify.addr >> PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_SIZE, > > > > > 757 vma->vm_page_prot)) > > > > > 758 return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS; > > > > > 759 > > > > > 760 return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE; > > > > > 761 } > > > > > 762 > > > > Yes well, all this remapping clearly has no chance to work > > > > on systems without CONFIG_MMU. > > > > > > It looks to me mmap can work according to Documentation/nommu-mmap.txt. But > > > I'm not sure it's worth to bother. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Well > > > > int remap_pfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, > > unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size, pgprot_t prot) > > { > > if (addr != (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT)) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > vma->vm_flags |= VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP | VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_DONTDUMP; > > return 0; > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(remap_pfn_range); > > > > > > So things aren't going to work if you have a fixed PFN > > which is the case of the hardware device. > > > Looking at the implementation of some drivers e.g mtd_char. If I read the > code correctly, we can do this by providing get_unmapped_area method and use > physical address directly. > > But start form CONFIG_MMU should be fine.? Do you prefer making vhost_vdpa > depends on CONFIG_MMU or just fail mmap when CONFIG_MMU is not configured? > > ThanksI'd just not specify the mmap callback at all.> > > > > > > > > > > > >
Jason Wang
2020-Jun-03 06:37 UTC
[PATCH 4/6] vhost_vdpa: support doorbell mapping via mmap
On 2020/6/3 ??2:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:> On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 12:18:44PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2020/6/2 ??9:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 02:49:38PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> On 2020/6/2 ??12:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 03:22:49AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: >>>>>> Hi Jason, >>>>>> >>>>>> I love your patch! Yet something to improve: >>>>>> >>>>>> [auto build test ERROR on vhost/linux-next] >>>>>> [also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.7 next-20200529] >>>>>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help >>>>>> improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the >>>>>> base tree in git format-patch, please seehttps://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982] >>>>>> >>>>>> url:https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jason-Wang/vDPA-doorbell-mapping/20200531-070834 >>>>>> base:https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git linux-next >>>>>> config: m68k-randconfig-r011-20200601 (attached as .config) >>>>>> compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 >>>>>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): >>>>>> wgethttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross >>>>>> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross >>>>>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree >>>>>> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=m68k >>>>>> >>>>>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate >>>>>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot<lkp at intel.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): >>>>>> >>>>>> drivers/vhost/vdpa.c: In function 'vhost_vdpa_fault': >>>>>>>> drivers/vhost/vdpa.c:754:22: error: implicit declaration of function 'pgprot_noncached' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >>>>>> 754 | vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vma->vm_page_prot); >>>>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>>>>>>> drivers/vhost/vdpa.c:754:22: error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'pgprot_t' {aka 'struct <anonymous>'} from type 'int' >>>>>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors >>>>>> >>>>>> vim +/pgprot_noncached +754 drivers/vhost/vdpa.c >>>>>> >>>>>> 742 >>>>>> 743 static vm_fault_t vhost_vdpa_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf) >>>>>> 744 { >>>>>> 745 struct vhost_vdpa *v = vmf->vma->vm_file->private_data; >>>>>> 746 struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa; >>>>>> 747 const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config; >>>>>> 748 struct vdpa_notification_area notify; >>>>>> 749 struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma; >>>>>> 750 u16 index = vma->vm_pgoff; >>>>>> 751 >>>>>> 752 notify = ops->get_vq_notification(vdpa, index); >>>>>> 753 >>>>>> > 754 vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vma->vm_page_prot); >>>>>> 755 if (remap_pfn_range(vma, vmf->address & PAGE_MASK, >>>>>> 756 notify.addr >> PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_SIZE, >>>>>> 757 vma->vm_page_prot)) >>>>>> 758 return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS; >>>>>> 759 >>>>>> 760 return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE; >>>>>> 761 } >>>>>> 762 >>>>> Yes well, all this remapping clearly has no chance to work >>>>> on systems without CONFIG_MMU. >>>> It looks to me mmap can work according to Documentation/nommu-mmap.txt. But >>>> I'm not sure it's worth to bother. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>> Well >>> >>> int remap_pfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, >>> unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size, pgprot_t prot) >>> { >>> if (addr != (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT)) >>> return -EINVAL; >>> >>> vma->vm_flags |= VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP | VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_DONTDUMP; >>> return 0; >>> } >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(remap_pfn_range); >>> >>> >>> So things aren't going to work if you have a fixed PFN >>> which is the case of the hardware device. >> Looking at the implementation of some drivers e.g mtd_char. If I read the >> code correctly, we can do this by providing get_unmapped_area method and use >> physical address directly. >> >> But start form CONFIG_MMU should be fine.? Do you prefer making vhost_vdpa >> depends on CONFIG_MMU or just fail mmap when CONFIG_MMU is not configured? >> >> Thanks > I'd just not specify the mmap callback at all.Ok, will do. Thanks>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [PATCH 4/6] vhost_vdpa: support doorbell mapping via mmap
- [PATCH 4/6] vhost_vdpa: support doorbell mapping via mmap
- [PATCH 4/6] vhost_vdpa: support doorbell mapping via mmap
- [PATCH 4/6] vhost_vdpa: support doorbell mapping via mmap
- [PATCH 4/6] vhost_vdpa: support doorbell mapping via mmap