Move final cleanups to qxl_drm_release() callback. Add drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() call to qxl_pci_remove(). Reorder calls in qxl_device_fini(). Cleaning up gem & ttm might trigger qxl commands, so we should do that before releaseing command rings. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.c | 21 ++++++++++++++------- drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.c index 1d601f57a6ba..8044363ba0f2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.c @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ #include <linux/pci.h> #include <drm/drm.h> +#include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h> #include <drm/drm_drv.h> #include <drm/drm_file.h> #include <drm/drm_modeset_helper.h> @@ -132,21 +133,25 @@ qxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) return ret; } +static void qxl_drm_release(struct drm_device *dev) +{ + struct qxl_device *qdev = dev->dev_private; + + qxl_modeset_fini(qdev); + qxl_device_fini(qdev); + dev->dev_private = NULL; + kfree(qdev); +} + static void qxl_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) { struct drm_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); - struct qxl_device *qdev = dev->dev_private; drm_dev_unregister(dev); - - qxl_modeset_fini(qdev); - qxl_device_fini(qdev); + drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(dev); if (is_vga(pdev)) vga_put(pdev, VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_IO); - - dev->dev_private = NULL; - kfree(qdev); drm_dev_put(dev); } @@ -279,6 +284,8 @@ static struct drm_driver qxl_driver = { .major = 0, .minor = 1, .patchlevel = 0, + + .release = qxl_drm_release, }; static int __init qxl_init(void) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c index bfc1631093e9..70b20ee4741a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c @@ -299,12 +299,12 @@ void qxl_device_fini(struct qxl_device *qdev) { qxl_bo_unref(&qdev->current_release_bo[0]); qxl_bo_unref(&qdev->current_release_bo[1]); - flush_work(&qdev->gc_work); - qxl_ring_free(qdev->command_ring); - qxl_ring_free(qdev->cursor_ring); - qxl_ring_free(qdev->release_ring); qxl_gem_fini(qdev); qxl_bo_fini(qdev); + flush_work(&qdev->gc_work); + qxl_ring_free(qdev->command_ring); + qxl_ring_free(qdev->cursor_ring); + qxl_ring_free(qdev->release_ring); io_mapping_free(qdev->surface_mapping); io_mapping_free(qdev->vram_mapping); iounmap(qdev->ram_header); -- 2.18.1
Frediano Ziglio
2019-Dec-20 12:09 UTC
[Spice-devel] [PATCH 4/4] drm/qxl: add drm_driver.release callback.
> > Move final cleanups to qxl_drm_release() callback.Can you explain in the commit why this is better or preferable?> Add drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() call to qxl_pci_remove().I suppose this is to replace the former manual cleanup calls, which were moved to qxl_drm_release, I think this could be added in the commit message ("why"), I don't see much value in describing "how" this was done.> > Reorder calls in qxl_device_fini(). Cleaning up gem & ttm > might trigger qxl commands, so we should do that before > releaseing command rings.Typo: releaseing -> releasing Why not putting this in a separate commit? Was this behaviour changed? It does not seem so to me.> > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.c | 21 ++++++++++++++------- > drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c | 8 ++++---- > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.c > index 1d601f57a6ba..8044363ba0f2 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.c > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ > #include <linux/pci.h> > > #include <drm/drm.h> > +#include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h> > #include <drm/drm_drv.h> > #include <drm/drm_file.h> > #include <drm/drm_modeset_helper.h> > @@ -132,21 +133,25 @@ qxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct > pci_device_id *ent) > return ret; > } > > +static void qxl_drm_release(struct drm_device *dev) > +{ > + struct qxl_device *qdev = dev->dev_private; > + > + qxl_modeset_fini(qdev); > + qxl_device_fini(qdev); > + dev->dev_private = NULL; > + kfree(qdev); > +} > + > static void > qxl_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) > { > struct drm_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); > - struct qxl_device *qdev = dev->dev_private; > > drm_dev_unregister(dev); > - > - qxl_modeset_fini(qdev); > - qxl_device_fini(qdev); > + drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(dev); > if (is_vga(pdev)) > vga_put(pdev, VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_IO); > - > - dev->dev_private = NULL; > - kfree(qdev); > drm_dev_put(dev); > } > > @@ -279,6 +284,8 @@ static struct drm_driver qxl_driver = { > .major = 0, > .minor = 1, > .patchlevel = 0, > + > + .release = qxl_drm_release, > }; > > static int __init qxl_init(void) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c > index bfc1631093e9..70b20ee4741a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_kms.c > @@ -299,12 +299,12 @@ void qxl_device_fini(struct qxl_device *qdev) > { > qxl_bo_unref(&qdev->current_release_bo[0]); > qxl_bo_unref(&qdev->current_release_bo[1]); > - flush_work(&qdev->gc_work); > - qxl_ring_free(qdev->command_ring); > - qxl_ring_free(qdev->cursor_ring); > - qxl_ring_free(qdev->release_ring); > qxl_gem_fini(qdev); > qxl_bo_fini(qdev); > + flush_work(&qdev->gc_work); > + qxl_ring_free(qdev->command_ring); > + qxl_ring_free(qdev->cursor_ring); > + qxl_ring_free(qdev->release_ring); > io_mapping_free(qdev->surface_mapping); > io_mapping_free(qdev->vram_mapping); > iounmap(qdev->ram_header);Frediano
Gerd Hoffmann
2019-Dec-20 13:00 UTC
[Spice-devel] [PATCH 4/4] drm/qxl: add drm_driver.release callback.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 07:09:20AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:> > > > Move final cleanups to qxl_drm_release() callback. > > Can you explain in the commit why this is better or preferable?It gets called when the drm device refcount goes down to zero. It's needed for a proper cleanup in the correct order.> > Add drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() call to qxl_pci_remove(). > > I suppose this is to replace the former manual cleanup calls, > which were moved to qxl_drm_release, I think this could be > added in the commit message ("why"), I don't see much value > in describing "how" this was done.The call is part of the shutdown sequence for atomic drm drivers and wasn't present in qxl for some reason.> > Reorder calls in qxl_device_fini(). Cleaning up gem & ttm > > might trigger qxl commands, so we should do that before > > releaseing command rings. > > Typo: releaseing -> releasing > Why not putting this in a separate commit? Was this behaviour > changed? It does not seem so to me.Yes, I can make that a separate commit. No, behavior didn't change. qxl_device_fini() is simply broken without this. cheers, Gerd
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [PATCH] drm/qxl: add drm_driver.release callback.
- [Spice-devel] [PATCH 4/4] drm/qxl: add drm_driver.release callback.
- [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/qxl: reorder calls in qxl_device_fini().
- [PATCH] drm: qxl: Fix error handling at qxl_device_init
- [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/qxl: add drm_driver.release callback.