thr3ads.net - Linux Virtualization - [PATCH 1/3] virtiofs: Use a common function to send forget [Oct 2019]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Vivek Goyal

2019-Oct-30 15:07 UTC

[PATCH 0/3] virtiofs: Small Cleanups for 5.5

Hi Miklos,

Here are few small cleanups for virtiofs for 5.5. I had received some
comments from Michael Tsirkin on original virtiofs patches and these
cleanups are result of these comments.

Thanks
Vivek

Vivek Goyal (3):
  virtiofs: Use a common function to send forget
  virtiofs: Do not send forget request "struct list_head" element
  virtiofs: Use completions while waiting for queue to be drained

 fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 204 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1

Vivek Goyal

2019-Oct-30 15:07 UTC

head link

[PATCH 1/3] virtiofs: Use a common function to send forget

Currently we are duplicating logic to send forgets at two places. Consolidate
the code by calling one helper function.

This also uses virtqueue_add_outbuf() instead of virtqueue_add_sgs(). Former
is simpler to call.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at redhat.com>
---
 fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 150 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
index a5c86048b96e..6cc7be170cb8 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
@@ -313,17 +313,71 @@ static void virtio_fs_request_dispatch_work(struct
work_struct *work)
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * Returns 1 if queue is full and sender should wait a bit before sending
+ * next request, 0 otherwise.
+ */
+static int send_forget_request(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq,
+			       struct virtio_fs_forget *forget,
+			       bool in_flight)
+{
+	struct scatterlist sg;
+	struct virtqueue *vq;
+	int ret = 0;
+	bool notify;
+
+	spin_lock(&fsvq->lock);
+	if (!fsvq->connected) {
+		if (in_flight)
+			dec_in_flight_req(fsvq);
+		kfree(forget);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	sg_init_one(&sg, forget, sizeof(*forget));
+	vq = fsvq->vq;
+	dev_dbg(&vq->vdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
+
+	ret = virtqueue_add_outbuf(vq, &sg, 1, forget, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		if (ret == -ENOMEM || ret == -ENOSPC) {
+			pr_debug("virtio-fs: Could not queue FORGET: err=%d."
+				 " Will try later\n", ret);
+			list_add_tail(&forget->list, &fsvq->queued_reqs);
+			schedule_delayed_work(&fsvq->dispatch_work,
+					      msecs_to_jiffies(1));
+			if (!in_flight)
+				inc_in_flight_req(fsvq);
+			/* Queue is full */
+			ret = 1;
+		} else {
+			pr_debug("virtio-fs: Could not queue FORGET: err=%d."
+				 " Dropping it.\n", ret);
+			kfree(forget);
+			if (in_flight)
+				dec_in_flight_req(fsvq);
+		}
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	if (!in_flight)
+		inc_in_flight_req(fsvq);
+	notify = virtqueue_kick_prepare(vq);
+	spin_unlock(&fsvq->lock);
+
+	if (notify)
+		virtqueue_notify(vq);
+	return ret;
+out:
+	spin_unlock(&fsvq->lock);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static void virtio_fs_hiprio_dispatch_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct virtio_fs_forget *forget;
 	struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq = container_of(work, struct virtio_fs_vq,
 						 dispatch_work.work);
-	struct virtqueue *vq = fsvq->vq;
-	struct scatterlist sg;
-	struct scatterlist *sgs[] = {&sg};
-	bool notify;
-	int ret;
-
 	pr_debug("virtio-fs: worker %s called.\n", __func__);
 	while (1) {
 		spin_lock(&fsvq->lock);
@@ -335,43 +389,9 @@ static void virtio_fs_hiprio_dispatch_work(struct
work_struct *work)
 		}
 
 		list_del(&forget->list);
-		if (!fsvq->connected) {
-			dec_in_flight_req(fsvq);
-			spin_unlock(&fsvq->lock);
-			kfree(forget);
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		sg_init_one(&sg, forget, sizeof(*forget));
-
-		/* Enqueue the request */
-		dev_dbg(&vq->vdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
-		ret = virtqueue_add_sgs(vq, sgs, 1, 0, forget, GFP_ATOMIC);
-		if (ret < 0) {
-			if (ret == -ENOMEM || ret == -ENOSPC) {
-				pr_debug("virtio-fs: Could not queue FORGET: err=%d. Will try
later\n",
-					 ret);
-				list_add_tail(&forget->list,
-						&fsvq->queued_reqs);
-				schedule_delayed_work(&fsvq->dispatch_work,
-						msecs_to_jiffies(1));
-			} else {
-				pr_debug("virtio-fs: Could not queue FORGET: err=%d. Dropping
it.\n",
-					 ret);
-				dec_in_flight_req(fsvq);
-				kfree(forget);
-			}
-			spin_unlock(&fsvq->lock);
-			return;
-		}
-
-		notify = virtqueue_kick_prepare(vq);
 		spin_unlock(&fsvq->lock);
-
-		if (notify)
-			virtqueue_notify(vq);
-		pr_debug("virtio-fs: worker %s dispatched one forget request.\n",
-			 __func__);
+		if (send_forget_request(fsvq, forget, true))
+			return;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -710,14 +730,9 @@ __releases(fiq->lock)
 {
 	struct fuse_forget_link *link;
 	struct virtio_fs_forget *forget;
-	struct scatterlist sg;
-	struct scatterlist *sgs[] = {&sg};
 	struct virtio_fs *fs;
-	struct virtqueue *vq;
 	struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq;
-	bool notify;
 	u64 unique;
-	int ret;
 
 	link = fuse_dequeue_forget(fiq, 1, NULL);
 	unique = fuse_get_unique(fiq);
@@ -739,46 +754,7 @@ __releases(fiq->lock)
 		.nlookup = link->forget_one.nlookup,
 	};
 
-	sg_init_one(&sg, forget, sizeof(*forget));
-
-	/* Enqueue the request */
-	spin_lock(&fsvq->lock);
-
-	if (!fsvq->connected) {
-		kfree(forget);
-		spin_unlock(&fsvq->lock);
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	vq = fsvq->vq;
-	dev_dbg(&vq->vdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
-
-	ret = virtqueue_add_sgs(vq, sgs, 1, 0, forget, GFP_ATOMIC);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		if (ret == -ENOMEM || ret == -ENOSPC) {
-			pr_debug("virtio-fs: Could not queue FORGET: err=%d. Will try
later.\n",
-				 ret);
-			list_add_tail(&forget->list, &fsvq->queued_reqs);
-			schedule_delayed_work(&fsvq->dispatch_work,
-					msecs_to_jiffies(1));
-			inc_in_flight_req(fsvq);
-		} else {
-			pr_debug("virtio-fs: Could not queue FORGET: err=%d. Dropping
it.\n",
-				 ret);
-			kfree(forget);
-		}
-		spin_unlock(&fsvq->lock);
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	inc_in_flight_req(fsvq);
-	notify = virtqueue_kick_prepare(vq);
-
-	spin_unlock(&fsvq->lock);
-
-	if (notify)
-		virtqueue_notify(vq);
-out:
+	send_forget_request(fsvq, forget, false);
 	kfree(link);
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1

Vivek Goyal

2019-Oct-30 15:07 UTC

head link

[PATCH 2/3] virtiofs: Do not send forget request "struct list_head" element

We are sending whole of virtio_fs_foreget struct to the other end over
virtqueue. Other end does not need to see elements like "struct list".
That's internal detail of guest kernel. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at redhat.com>
---
 fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
index 6cc7be170cb8..43224db8d9ed 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
@@ -48,11 +48,15 @@ struct virtio_fs {
 	unsigned int num_request_queues; /* number of request queues */
 };
 
-struct virtio_fs_forget {
+struct virtio_fs_forget_req {
 	struct fuse_in_header ih;
 	struct fuse_forget_in arg;
+};
+
+struct virtio_fs_forget {
 	/* This request can be temporarily queued on virt queue */
 	struct list_head list;
+	struct virtio_fs_forget_req req;
 };
 
 static int virtio_fs_enqueue_req(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq,
@@ -325,6 +329,7 @@ static int send_forget_request(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq,
 	struct virtqueue *vq;
 	int ret = 0;
 	bool notify;
+	struct virtio_fs_forget_req *req = &forget->req;
 
 	spin_lock(&fsvq->lock);
 	if (!fsvq->connected) {
@@ -334,7 +339,7 @@ static int send_forget_request(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	sg_init_one(&sg, forget, sizeof(*forget));
+	sg_init_one(&sg, req, sizeof(*req));
 	vq = fsvq->vq;
 	dev_dbg(&vq->vdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
 
@@ -730,6 +735,7 @@ __releases(fiq->lock)
 {
 	struct fuse_forget_link *link;
 	struct virtio_fs_forget *forget;
+	struct virtio_fs_forget_req *req;
 	struct virtio_fs *fs;
 	struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq;
 	u64 unique;
@@ -743,14 +749,15 @@ __releases(fiq->lock)
 
 	/* Allocate a buffer for the request */
 	forget = kmalloc(sizeof(*forget), GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL);
+	req = &forget->req;
 
-	forget->ih = (struct fuse_in_header){
+	req->ih = (struct fuse_in_header){
 		.opcode = FUSE_FORGET,
 		.nodeid = link->forget_one.nodeid,
 		.unique = unique,
-		.len = sizeof(*forget),
+		.len = sizeof(*req),
 	};
-	forget->arg = (struct fuse_forget_in){
+	req->arg = (struct fuse_forget_in){
 		.nlookup = link->forget_one.nlookup,
 	};
 
-- 
2.20.1

Vivek Goyal

2019-Oct-30 15:07 UTC

head link

[PATCH 3/3] virtiofs: Use completions while waiting for queue to be drained

While we wait for queue to finish draining, use completions instead of
uslee_range(). This is better way of waiting for event.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at redhat.com>
---
 fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
index 43224db8d9ed..b5ba83ef1914 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct virtio_fs_vq {
 	struct fuse_dev *fud;
 	bool connected;
 	long in_flight;
+	struct completion in_flight_zero; /* No inflight requests */
 	char name[24];
 } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 
@@ -85,6 +86,8 @@ static inline void dec_in_flight_req(struct virtio_fs_vq
*fsvq)
 {
 	WARN_ON(fsvq->in_flight <= 0);
 	fsvq->in_flight--;
+	if (!fsvq->in_flight)
+		complete(&fsvq->in_flight_zero);
 }
 
 static void release_virtio_fs_obj(struct kref *ref)
@@ -115,22 +118,23 @@ static void virtio_fs_drain_queue(struct virtio_fs_vq
*fsvq)
 	WARN_ON(fsvq->in_flight < 0);
 
 	/* Wait for in flight requests to finish.*/
-	while (1) {
-		spin_lock(&fsvq->lock);
-		if (!fsvq->in_flight) {
-			spin_unlock(&fsvq->lock);
-			break;
-		}
+	spin_lock(&fsvq->lock);
+	if (fsvq->in_flight) {
+		/* We are holding virtio_fs_mutex. There should not be any
+		 * waiters waiting for completion.
+		 */
+		reinit_completion(&fsvq->in_flight_zero);
+		spin_unlock(&fsvq->lock);
+		wait_for_completion(&fsvq->in_flight_zero);
+	} else {
 		spin_unlock(&fsvq->lock);
-		/* TODO use completion instead of timeout */
-		usleep_range(1000, 2000);
 	}
 
 	flush_work(&fsvq->done_work);
 	flush_delayed_work(&fsvq->dispatch_work);
 }
 
-static void virtio_fs_drain_all_queues(struct virtio_fs *fs)
+static void virtio_fs_drain_all_queues_locked(struct virtio_fs *fs)
 {
 	struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq;
 	int i;
@@ -141,6 +145,19 @@ static void virtio_fs_drain_all_queues(struct virtio_fs
*fs)
 	}
 }
 
+static void virtio_fs_drain_all_queues(struct virtio_fs *fs)
+{
+	/* Provides mutual exclusion between ->remove and ->kill_sb
+	 * paths. We don't want both of these draining queue at the
+	 * same time. Current completion logic reinits completion
+	 * and that means there should not be any other thread
+	 * doing reinit or waiting for completion already.
+	 */
+	mutex_lock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
+	virtio_fs_drain_all_queues_locked(fs);
+	mutex_unlock(&virtio_fs_mutex);
+}
+
 static void virtio_fs_start_all_queues(struct virtio_fs *fs)
 {
 	struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq;
@@ -581,6 +598,7 @@ static int virtio_fs_setup_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev,
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fs->vqs[VQ_HIPRIO].end_reqs);
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&fs->vqs[VQ_HIPRIO].dispatch_work,
 			virtio_fs_hiprio_dispatch_work);
+	init_completion(&fs->vqs[VQ_HIPRIO].in_flight_zero);
 	spin_lock_init(&fs->vqs[VQ_HIPRIO].lock);
 
 	/* Initialize the requests virtqueues */
@@ -591,6 +609,7 @@ static int virtio_fs_setup_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev,
 				  virtio_fs_request_dispatch_work);
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fs->vqs[i].queued_reqs);
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fs->vqs[i].end_reqs);
+		init_completion(&fs->vqs[i].in_flight_zero);
 		snprintf(fs->vqs[i].name, sizeof(fs->vqs[i].name),
 			 "requests.%u", i - VQ_REQUEST);
 		callbacks[i] = virtio_fs_vq_done;
@@ -684,7 +703,7 @@ static void virtio_fs_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	/* This device is going away. No one should get new reference */
 	list_del_init(&fs->list);
 	virtio_fs_stop_all_queues(fs);
-	virtio_fs_drain_all_queues(fs);
+	virtio_fs_drain_all_queues_locked(fs);
 	vdev->config->reset(vdev);
 	virtio_fs_cleanup_vqs(vdev, fs);
 
-- 
2.20.1

Stefan Hajnoczi

2019-Nov-13 14:30 UTC

head link

[PATCH 2/3] virtiofs: Do not send forget request "struct list_head" element

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:07:18AM -0400, Vivek Goyal
wrote:> We are sending whole of virtio_fs_foreget struct to the other end over
s/foreget/forget/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20191113/274e7775/attachment.sig>

Stefan Hajnoczi

2019-Nov-13 14:40 UTC

head link

[PATCH 3/3] virtiofs: Use completions while waiting for queue to be drained

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:07:19AM -0400, Vivek Goyal
wrote:> While we wait for queue to finish draining, use completions instead of
> uslee_range(). This is better way of waiting for event.
s/uslee_range()/usleep_range()/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20191113/b18e28ad/attachment.sig>

Stefan Hajnoczi

2019-Nov-13 14:40 UTC

head link

[PATCH 0/3] virtiofs: Small Cleanups for 5.5

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:07:16AM -0400, Vivek Goyal
wrote:> Hi Miklos,
> 
> Here are few small cleanups for virtiofs for 5.5. I had received some
> comments from Michael Tsirkin on original virtiofs patches and these
> cleanups are result of these comments.
> 
> Thanks
> Vivek
> 
> Vivek Goyal (3):
>   virtiofs: Use a common function to send forget
>   virtiofs: Do not send forget request "struct list_head" element
>   virtiofs: Use completions while waiting for queue to be drained
> 
>  fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 204 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
There are typos in the commit descriptions but the code looks fine:

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20191113/26efed48/attachment.sig>

Possibly Parallel Threads

Search for more seemingly similar threads

Linux Virtualization - Oct 2019 - [PATCH 1/3] virtiofs: Use a common function to send forget

[PATCH 0/3] virtiofs: Small Cleanups for 5.5

[PATCH 1/3] virtiofs: Use a common function to send forget

[PATCH 2/3] virtiofs: Do not send forget request "struct list_head" element

[PATCH 3/3] virtiofs: Use completions while waiting for queue to be drained

[PATCH 2/3] virtiofs: Do not send forget request "struct list_head" element

[PATCH 3/3] virtiofs: Use completions while waiting for queue to be drained

[PATCH 0/3] virtiofs: Small Cleanups for 5.5

Possibly Parallel Threads