thr3ads.net - Linux Virtualization - [PATCH v6 08/18] drm/virtio: rework virtio_gpu_execbuffer

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Gerd Hoffmann

2019-Jul-02 14:18 UTC

[PATCH v6 08/18] drm/virtio: rework virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl fencing

Rework fencing workflow, starting with virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl.
Stop using ttm helpers, use the virtio_gpu_array_* helpers (which work
on the reservation objects directly) instead.

New workflow:

 (1) All gem objects needed by a command are added to a
     virtio_gpu_object_array.
 (2) All reservation objects will be locked (virtio_gpu_array_lock_resv).
 (3) virtio_gpu_fence_emit() completes fence initialization.
 (4) fence gets added to the objects, reservation objects are unlocked
     (virtio_gpu_array_add_fence, virtio_gpu_array_unlock_resv).
 (5) virtio command is submitted to the host.
 (6) The completion callback (virtio_gpu_dequeue_ctrl_func)
     will drop object references and free virtio_gpu_object_array.

v6: rewrite most of the patch.

Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h   |  6 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c | 56 +++++++++-----------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c    | 21 +++++++---
 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h
index abb078a5dedf..98511d1dfff2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h
@@ -121,9 +121,9 @@ struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer {
 
 	char *resp_buf;
 	int resp_size;
-
 	virtio_gpu_resp_cb resp_cb;
 
+	struct virtio_gpu_object_array *objs;
 	struct list_head list;
 };
 
@@ -318,7 +318,9 @@ void virtio_gpu_cmd_context_detach_resource(struct
virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
 					    uint32_t resource_id);
 void virtio_gpu_cmd_submit(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
 			   void *data, uint32_t data_size,
-			   uint32_t ctx_id, struct virtio_gpu_fence *fence);
+			   uint32_t ctx_id,
+			   struct virtio_gpu_object_array *objs,
+			   struct virtio_gpu_fence *fence);
 void virtio_gpu_cmd_transfer_from_host_3d(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
 					  uint32_t resource_id, uint32_t ctx_id,
 					  uint64_t offset, uint32_t level,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
index 0caff3fa623e..9735d7e5899b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
@@ -105,16 +105,11 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device
*dev, void *data,
 	struct drm_virtgpu_execbuffer *exbuf = data;
 	struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev = dev->dev_private;
 	struct virtio_gpu_fpriv *vfpriv = drm_file->driver_priv;
-	struct drm_gem_object *gobj;
 	struct virtio_gpu_fence *out_fence;
-	struct virtio_gpu_object *qobj;
 	int ret;
 	uint32_t *bo_handles = NULL;
 	void __user *user_bo_handles = NULL;
-	struct list_head validate_list;
-	struct ttm_validate_buffer *buflist = NULL;
-	int i;
-	struct ww_acquire_ctx ticket;
+	struct virtio_gpu_object_array *buflist = NULL;
 	struct sync_file *sync_file;
 	int in_fence_fd = exbuf->fence_fd;
 	int out_fence_fd = -1;
@@ -155,15 +150,10 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device
*dev, void *data,
 			return out_fence_fd;
 	}
 
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&validate_list);
 	if (exbuf->num_bo_handles) {
-
 		bo_handles = kvmalloc_array(exbuf->num_bo_handles,
-					   sizeof(uint32_t), GFP_KERNEL);
-		buflist = kvmalloc_array(exbuf->num_bo_handles,
-					   sizeof(struct ttm_validate_buffer),
-					   GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
-		if (!bo_handles || !buflist) {
+					    sizeof(uint32_t), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!bo_handles) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
 			goto out_unused_fd;
 		}
@@ -175,25 +165,21 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device
*dev, void *data,
 			goto out_unused_fd;
 		}
 
-		for (i = 0; i < exbuf->num_bo_handles; i++) {
-			gobj = drm_gem_object_lookup(drm_file, bo_handles[i]);
-			if (!gobj) {
-				ret = -ENOENT;
-				goto out_unused_fd;
-			}
-
-			qobj = gem_to_virtio_gpu_obj(gobj);
-			buflist[i].bo = &qobj->tbo;
-
-			list_add(&buflist[i].head, &validate_list);
+		buflist = virtio_gpu_array_from_handles(drm_file, bo_handles,
+							exbuf->num_bo_handles);
+		if (!buflist) {
+			ret = -ENOENT;
+			goto out_unused_fd;
 		}
 		kvfree(bo_handles);
 		bo_handles = NULL;
 	}
 
-	ret = virtio_gpu_object_list_validate(&ticket, &validate_list);
-	if (ret)
-		goto out_free;
+	if (buflist) {
+		ret = virtio_gpu_array_lock_resv(buflist);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out_unused_fd;
+	}
 
 	buf = memdup_user(u64_to_user_ptr(exbuf->command), exbuf->size);
 	if (IS_ERR(buf)) {
@@ -220,24 +206,18 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device
*dev, void *data,
 	}
 
 	virtio_gpu_cmd_submit(vgdev, buf, exbuf->size,
-			      vfpriv->ctx_id, out_fence);
-
-	ttm_eu_fence_buffer_objects(&ticket, &validate_list,
&out_fence->f);
-
-	/* fence the command bo */
-	virtio_gpu_unref_list(&validate_list);
-	kvfree(buflist);
+			      vfpriv->ctx_id, buflist, out_fence);
 	return 0;
 
 out_memdup:
 	kfree(buf);
 out_unresv:
-	ttm_eu_backoff_reservation(&ticket, &validate_list);
-out_free:
-	virtio_gpu_unref_list(&validate_list);
+	if (buflist)
+		virtio_gpu_array_unlock_resv(buflist);
 out_unused_fd:
 	kvfree(bo_handles);
-	kvfree(buflist);
+	if (buflist)
+		virtio_gpu_array_put_free(buflist);
 
 	if (out_fence_fd >= 0)
 		put_unused_fd(out_fence_fd);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
index 6c1a90717535..dbe329801e84 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ void virtio_gpu_dequeue_ctrl_func(struct work_struct *work)
 	} while (!virtqueue_enable_cb(vgdev->ctrlq.vq));
 	spin_unlock(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock);
 
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &reclaim_list, list) {
+	list_for_each_entry(entry, &reclaim_list, list) {
 		resp = (struct virtio_gpu_ctrl_hdr *)entry->resp_buf;
 
 		trace_virtio_gpu_cmd_response(vgdev->ctrlq.vq, resp);
@@ -218,14 +218,18 @@ void virtio_gpu_dequeue_ctrl_func(struct work_struct
*work)
 		}
 		if (entry->resp_cb)
 			entry->resp_cb(vgdev, entry);
-
-		list_del(&entry->list);
-		free_vbuf(vgdev, entry);
 	}
 	wake_up(&vgdev->ctrlq.ack_queue);
 
 	if (fence_id)
 		virtio_gpu_fence_event_process(vgdev, fence_id);
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &reclaim_list, list) {
+		if (entry->objs)
+			virtio_gpu_array_put_free(entry->objs);
+		list_del(&entry->list);
+		free_vbuf(vgdev, entry);
+	}
 }
 
 void virtio_gpu_dequeue_cursor_func(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -337,6 +341,10 @@ static int virtio_gpu_queue_fenced_ctrl_buffer(struct
virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
 
 	if (fence)
 		virtio_gpu_fence_emit(vgdev, hdr, fence);
+	if (vbuf->objs) {
+		virtio_gpu_array_add_fence(vbuf->objs, &fence->f);
+		virtio_gpu_array_unlock_resv(vbuf->objs);
+	}
 	rc = virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(vgdev, vbuf);
 	spin_unlock(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock);
 	return rc;
@@ -939,7 +947,9 @@ void virtio_gpu_cmd_transfer_from_host_3d(struct
virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
 
 void virtio_gpu_cmd_submit(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
 			   void *data, uint32_t data_size,
-			   uint32_t ctx_id, struct virtio_gpu_fence *fence)
+			   uint32_t ctx_id,
+			   struct virtio_gpu_object_array *objs,
+			   struct virtio_gpu_fence *fence)
 {
 	struct virtio_gpu_cmd_submit *cmd_p;
 	struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer *vbuf;
@@ -949,6 +959,7 @@ void virtio_gpu_cmd_submit(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
 
 	vbuf->data_buf = data;
 	vbuf->data_size = data_size;
+	vbuf->objs = objs;
 
 	cmd_p->hdr.type = cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_GPU_CMD_SUBMIT_3D);
 	cmd_p->hdr.ctx_id = cpu_to_le32(ctx_id);
-- 
2.18.1

Chia-I Wu

2019-Jul-03 18:49 UTC

head link

[PATCH v6 08/18] drm/virtio: rework virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl fencing

On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 7:19 AM Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
wrote:>
> Rework fencing workflow, starting with virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl.
> Stop using ttm helpers, use the virtio_gpu_array_* helpers (which work
> on the reservation objects directly) instead.
>
> New workflow:
>
>  (1) All gem objects needed by a command are added to a
>      virtio_gpu_object_array.
>  (2) All reservation objects will be locked (virtio_gpu_array_lock_resv).
>  (3) virtio_gpu_fence_emit() completes fence initialization.
>  (4) fence gets added to the objects, reservation objects are unlocked
>      (virtio_gpu_array_add_fence, virtio_gpu_array_unlock_resv).
>  (5) virtio command is submitted to the host.
>  (6) The completion callback (virtio_gpu_dequeue_ctrl_func)
>      will drop object references and free virtio_gpu_object_array.
>
> v6: rewrite most of the patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h   |  6 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c | 56 +++++++++-----------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c    | 21 +++++++---
>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h
> index abb078a5dedf..98511d1dfff2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h
> @@ -121,9 +121,9 @@ struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer {
>
>         char *resp_buf;
>         int resp_size;
> -
>         virtio_gpu_resp_cb resp_cb;
>
> +       struct virtio_gpu_object_array *objs;
>         struct list_head list;
>  };
>
> @@ -318,7 +318,9 @@ void virtio_gpu_cmd_context_detach_resource(struct
virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
>                                             uint32_t resource_id);
>  void virtio_gpu_cmd_submit(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
>                            void *data, uint32_t data_size,
> -                          uint32_t ctx_id, struct virtio_gpu_fence
*fence);
> +                          uint32_t ctx_id,
> +                          struct virtio_gpu_object_array *objs,
> +                          struct virtio_gpu_fence *fence);
>  void virtio_gpu_cmd_transfer_from_host_3d(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
>                                           uint32_t resource_id, uint32_t
ctx_id,
>                                           uint64_t offset, uint32_t level,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> index 0caff3fa623e..9735d7e5899b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> @@ -105,16 +105,11 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct
drm_device *dev, void *data,
>         struct drm_virtgpu_execbuffer *exbuf = data;
>         struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev = dev->dev_private;
>         struct virtio_gpu_fpriv *vfpriv = drm_file->driver_priv;
> -       struct drm_gem_object *gobj;
>         struct virtio_gpu_fence *out_fence;
> -       struct virtio_gpu_object *qobj;
>         int ret;
>         uint32_t *bo_handles = NULL;
>         void __user *user_bo_handles = NULL;
> -       struct list_head validate_list;
> -       struct ttm_validate_buffer *buflist = NULL;
> -       int i;
> -       struct ww_acquire_ctx ticket;
> +       struct virtio_gpu_object_array *buflist = NULL;
>         struct sync_file *sync_file;
>         int in_fence_fd = exbuf->fence_fd;
>         int out_fence_fd = -1;
> @@ -155,15 +150,10 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct
drm_device *dev, void *data,
>                         return out_fence_fd;
>         }
>
> -       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&validate_list);
>         if (exbuf->num_bo_handles) {
> -
>                 bo_handles = kvmalloc_array(exbuf->num_bo_handles,
> -                                          sizeof(uint32_t), GFP_KERNEL);
> -               buflist = kvmalloc_array(exbuf->num_bo_handles,
> -                                          sizeof(struct
ttm_validate_buffer),
> -                                          GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> -               if (!bo_handles || !buflist) {
> +                                           sizeof(uint32_t), GFP_KERNEL);
> +               if (!bo_handles) {
>                         ret = -ENOMEM;
>                         goto out_unused_fd;
>                 }
> @@ -175,25 +165,21 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct
drm_device *dev, void *data,
>                         goto out_unused_fd;
>                 }
>
> -               for (i = 0; i < exbuf->num_bo_handles; i++) {
> -                       gobj = drm_gem_object_lookup(drm_file,
bo_handles[i]);
> -                       if (!gobj) {
> -                               ret = -ENOENT;
> -                               goto out_unused_fd;
> -                       }
> -
> -                       qobj = gem_to_virtio_gpu_obj(gobj);
> -                       buflist[i].bo = &qobj->tbo;
> -
> -                       list_add(&buflist[i].head, &validate_list);
> +               buflist = virtio_gpu_array_from_handles(drm_file,
bo_handles,
> +                                                      
exbuf->num_bo_handles);
> +               if (!buflist) {
> +                       ret = -ENOENT;
> +                       goto out_unused_fd;
>                 }
>                 kvfree(bo_handles);
>                 bo_handles = NULL;
>         }
>
> -       ret = virtio_gpu_object_list_validate(&ticket,
&validate_list);
> -       if (ret)
> -               goto out_free;
> +       if (buflist) {
> +               ret = virtio_gpu_array_lock_resv(buflist);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       goto out_unused_fd;
> +       }
>
>         buf = memdup_user(u64_to_user_ptr(exbuf->command),
exbuf->size);
>         if (IS_ERR(buf)) {
> @@ -220,24 +206,18 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct
drm_device *dev, void *data,
>         }
>
>         virtio_gpu_cmd_submit(vgdev, buf, exbuf->size,
> -                             vfpriv->ctx_id, out_fence);
> -
> -       ttm_eu_fence_buffer_objects(&ticket, &validate_list,
&out_fence->f);
> -
> -       /* fence the command bo */
> -       virtio_gpu_unref_list(&validate_list);
> -       kvfree(buflist);
> +                             vfpriv->ctx_id, buflist, out_fence);
>         return 0;
>
>  out_memdup:
>         kfree(buf);
>  out_unresv:
> -       ttm_eu_backoff_reservation(&ticket, &validate_list);
> -out_free:
> -       virtio_gpu_unref_list(&validate_list);
> +       if (buflist)
> +               virtio_gpu_array_unlock_resv(buflist);
>  out_unused_fd:
>         kvfree(bo_handles);
> -       kvfree(buflist);
> +       if (buflist)
> +               virtio_gpu_array_put_free(buflist);
>
>         if (out_fence_fd >= 0)
>                 put_unused_fd(out_fence_fd);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
> index 6c1a90717535..dbe329801e84 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ void virtio_gpu_dequeue_ctrl_func(struct work_struct
*work)
>         } while (!virtqueue_enable_cb(vgdev->ctrlq.vq));
>         spin_unlock(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock);
>
> -       list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &reclaim_list, list) {
> +       list_for_each_entry(entry, &reclaim_list, list) {
>                 resp = (struct virtio_gpu_ctrl_hdr *)entry->resp_buf;
>
>                 trace_virtio_gpu_cmd_response(vgdev->ctrlq.vq, resp);
> @@ -218,14 +218,18 @@ void virtio_gpu_dequeue_ctrl_func(struct work_struct
*work)
>                 }
>                 if (entry->resp_cb)
>                         entry->resp_cb(vgdev, entry);
> -
> -               list_del(&entry->list);
> -               free_vbuf(vgdev, entry);
>         }
>         wake_up(&vgdev->ctrlq.ack_queue);
>
>         if (fence_id)
>                 virtio_gpu_fence_event_process(vgdev, fence_id);
> +
> +       list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &reclaim_list, list) {
> +               if (entry->objs)
> +                       virtio_gpu_array_put_free(entry->objs);
> +               list_del(&entry->list);
> +               free_vbuf(vgdev, entry);
> +       }
>  }
>
>  void virtio_gpu_dequeue_cursor_func(struct work_struct *work)
> @@ -337,6 +341,10 @@ static int virtio_gpu_queue_fenced_ctrl_buffer(struct
virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
>
>         if (fence)
>                 virtio_gpu_fence_emit(vgdev, hdr, fence);
> +       if (vbuf->objs) {
> +               virtio_gpu_array_add_fence(vbuf->objs,
&fence->f);
> +               virtio_gpu_array_unlock_resv(vbuf->objs);
> +       }This is with the spinlock held.  Maybe we should move the
virtio_gpu_array_unlock_resv call out of the critical section.

I am actually more concerned about virtio_gpu_array_add_fence, but it
is also harder to move.  Should we add a kref to the object array?

This bothers me because I recently ran into a CPU-bound game with very
bad lock contention here.
>         rc = virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(vgdev, vbuf);
>         spin_unlock(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock);
>         return rc;
> @@ -939,7 +947,9 @@ void virtio_gpu_cmd_transfer_from_host_3d(struct
virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
>
>  void virtio_gpu_cmd_submit(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
>                            void *data, uint32_t data_size,
> -                          uint32_t ctx_id, struct virtio_gpu_fence *fence)
> +                          uint32_t ctx_id,
> +                          struct virtio_gpu_object_array *objs,
> +                          struct virtio_gpu_fence *fence)
>  {
>         struct virtio_gpu_cmd_submit *cmd_p;
>         struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer *vbuf;
> @@ -949,6 +959,7 @@ void virtio_gpu_cmd_submit(struct virtio_gpu_device
*vgdev,
>
>         vbuf->data_buf = data;
>         vbuf->data_size = data_size;
> +       vbuf->objs = objs;
>
>         cmd_p->hdr.type = cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_GPU_CMD_SUBMIT_3D);
>         cmd_p->hdr.ctx_id = cpu_to_le32(ctx_id);
> --
> 2.18.1
>

Gerd Hoffmann

2019-Jul-04 11:25 UTC

head link

[PATCH v6 08/18] drm/virtio: rework virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl fencing

Hi,
> >         if (fence)
> >                 virtio_gpu_fence_emit(vgdev, hdr, fence);
> > +       if (vbuf->objs) {
> > +               virtio_gpu_array_add_fence(vbuf->objs,
&fence->f);
> > +               virtio_gpu_array_unlock_resv(vbuf->objs);
> > +       }
> This is with the spinlock held.  Maybe we should move the
> virtio_gpu_array_unlock_resv call out of the critical section.
That would bring back the race ...
> I am actually more concerned about virtio_gpu_array_add_fence, but it
> is also harder to move.  Should we add a kref to the object array?
Yep, refcounting would be the other way to fix the race.
> This bothers me because I recently ran into a CPU-bound game with very
> bad lock contention here.
Hmm.  Any clue where this comes from?  Multiple threads competing for
virtio buffers I guess?  Maybe we should have larger virtqueues?

cheers,
  Gerd

Apparently Analagous Threads

Search for more possibly parallel threads

Linux Virtualization - Jul 2019 - [PATCH v6 08/18] drm/virtio: rework virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl fencing

[PATCH v6 08/18] drm/virtio: rework virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl fencing

[PATCH v6 08/18] drm/virtio: rework virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl fencing

[PATCH v6 08/18] drm/virtio: rework virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl fencing

Apparently Analagous Threads