On Wed, 8 May 2019 23:22:10 +0200 Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote:> On Wed, 8 May 2019 15:18:10 +0200 (CEST) > Sebastian Ott <sebott at linux.ibm.com> wrote:> > > @@ -1063,6 +1163,7 @@ static int __init css_bus_init(void) > > > unregister_reboot_notifier(&css_reboot_notifier); > > > goto out_unregister; > > > } > > > + cio_dma_pool_init(); > > > > This is too late for early devices (ccw console!). > > You have already raised concern about this last time (thanks). I think, > I've addressed this issue: tje cio_dma_pool is only used by the airq > stuff. I don't think the ccw console needs it. Please have an other look > at patch #6, and explain your concern in more detail if it persists.What about changing the naming/adding comments here, so that (1) folks aren't confused by the same thing in the future and (2) folks don't try to use that pool for something needed for the early ccw consoles?
On Thu, 9 May 2019 12:11:06 +0200 Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> wrote:> On Wed, 8 May 2019 23:22:10 +0200 > Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, 8 May 2019 15:18:10 +0200 (CEST) > > Sebastian Ott <sebott at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > @@ -1063,6 +1163,7 @@ static int __init css_bus_init(void) > > > > unregister_reboot_notifier(&css_reboot_notifier); > > > > goto out_unregister; > > > > } > > > > + cio_dma_pool_init(); > > > > > > This is too late for early devices (ccw console!). > > > > You have already raised concern about this last time (thanks). I think, > > I've addressed this issue: tje cio_dma_pool is only used by the airq > > stuff. I don't think the ccw console needs it. Please have an other look > > at patch #6, and explain your concern in more detail if it persists. > > What about changing the naming/adding comments here, so that (1) folks > aren't confused by the same thing in the future and (2) folks don't try > to use that pool for something needed for the early ccw consoles? >I'm all for clarity! Suggestions for better names? Regards, Halil
On Fri, 10 May 2019 00:11:12 +0200 Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote:> On Thu, 9 May 2019 12:11:06 +0200 > Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, 8 May 2019 23:22:10 +0200 > > Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 8 May 2019 15:18:10 +0200 (CEST) > > > Sebastian Ott <sebott at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > > > @@ -1063,6 +1163,7 @@ static int __init css_bus_init(void) > > > > > unregister_reboot_notifier(&css_reboot_notifier); > > > > > goto out_unregister; > > > > > } > > > > > + cio_dma_pool_init(); > > > > > > > > This is too late for early devices (ccw console!). > > > > > > You have already raised concern about this last time (thanks). I think, > > > I've addressed this issue: tje cio_dma_pool is only used by the airq > > > stuff. I don't think the ccw console needs it. Please have an other look > > > at patch #6, and explain your concern in more detail if it persists. > > > > What about changing the naming/adding comments here, so that (1) folks > > aren't confused by the same thing in the future and (2) folks don't try > > to use that pool for something needed for the early ccw consoles? > > > > I'm all for clarity! Suggestions for better names?css_aiv_dma_pool, maybe? Or is there other cross-device stuff that may need it?
Reasonably Related Threads
- [PATCH 05/10] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
- [PATCH 05/10] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
- [PATCH 05/10] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
- [PATCH v4 4/8] s390/airq: use DMA memory for adapter interrupts
- [PATCH v4 4/8] s390/airq: use DMA memory for adapter interrupts