Christian Borntraeger
2017-Nov-17 14:42 UTC
4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk
When doing cpu hotplug in a KVM guest with virtio blk I get warnings like
747.652408] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 747.652410] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144
__blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xd4/0x100
[ 747.652410] Modules linked in: dm_multipath
[ 747.652412] CPU: 4 PID: 2895 Comm: kworker/4:1H Tainted: G W
4.14.0+ #191
[ 747.652412] Hardware name: IBM 2964 NC9 704 (KVM/Linux)
[ 747.652414] Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
[ 747.652414] task: 0000000060680000 task.stack: 000000005ea30000
[ 747.652415] Krnl PSW : 0704f00180000000 0000000000505864
(__blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xd4/0x100)
[ 747.652417] R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:3 PM:0
RI:0 EA:3
[ 747.652417] Krnl GPRS: 0000000000000010 00000000000000ff 000000005cbec400
0000000000000000
[ 747.652418] 0000000063709120 0000000000000000 0000000063709500
0000000059fa44b0
[ 747.652418] 0000000059fa4480 0000000000000000 000000006370f700
0000000063709100
[ 747.652419] 000000005cbec500 0000000000970948 000000005ea33d80
000000005ea33d48
[ 747.652423] Krnl Code: 0000000000505854: ebaff0a00004 lmg
%r10,%r15,160(%r15)
000000000050585a: c0f4ffe690d3 brcl 15,1d7a00
#0000000000505860: a7f40001 brc 15,505862
>0000000000505864: 581003b0 l %r1,944
0000000000505868: c01b001fff00 nilf %r1,2096896
000000000050586e: a784ffdb brc 8,505824
0000000000505872: a7f40001 brc 15,505874
0000000000505876: 9120218f tm 399(%r2),32
[ 747.652435] Call Trace:
[ 747.652435] ([<0000000063709600>] 0x63709600)
[ 747.652436] [<0000000000187bcc>] process_one_work+0x264/0x4b8
[ 747.652438] [<0000000000187e78>] worker_thread+0x58/0x4f8
[ 747.652439] [<000000000018ee94>] kthread+0x144/0x168
[ 747.652439] [<00000000008f8a62>] kernel_thread_starter+0x6/0xc
[ 747.652440] [<00000000008f8a5c>] kernel_thread_starter+0x0/0xc
[ 747.652440] Last Breaking-Event-Address:
[ 747.652441] [<0000000000505860>] __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xd0/0x100
[ 747.652442] ---[ end trace 4a001a80379b18ba ]---
[ 747.652450] ------------[ cut here ]------------
This is
b7a71e66d (Jens Axboe 2017-08-01 09:28:24 -0600 1141) * are
mapped to it.
b7a71e66d (Jens Axboe 2017-08-01 09:28:24 -0600 1142) */
6a83e74d2 (Bart Van Assche 2016-11-02 10:09:51 -0600 1143)
WARN_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask) &&
6a83e74d2 (Bart Van Assche 2016-11-02 10:09:51 -0600 1144)
cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu));
6a83e74d2 (Bart Van Assche 2016-11-02 10:09:51 -0600 1145)
b7a71e66d (Jens Axboe 2017-08-01 09:28:24 -0600 1146) /*
Is this a known issue?
Christian
Bart Van Assche
2017-Nov-20 19:20 UTC
4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk
On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 15:42 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:> This is > > b7a71e66d (Jens Axboe 2017-08-01 09:28:24 -0600 1141) * are mapped to it. > b7a71e66d (Jens Axboe 2017-08-01 09:28:24 -0600 1142) */ > 6a83e74d2 (Bart Van Assche 2016-11-02 10:09:51 -0600 1143) WARN_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask) && > 6a83e74d2 (Bart Van Assche 2016-11-02 10:09:51 -0600 1144) cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu)); > 6a83e74d2 (Bart Van Assche 2016-11-02 10:09:51 -0600 1145) > b7a71e66d (Jens Axboe 2017-08-01 09:28:24 -0600 1146) /*Did you really try to figure out when the code that reported the warning was introduced? I think that warning was introduced through the following commit: commit fd1270d5df6a005e1248e87042159a799cc4b2c9 Date: Wed Apr 16 09:23:48 2014 -0600 blk-mq: don't use preempt_count() to check for right CPU UP or CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE will return 0, and what we really want to check is whether or not we are on the right CPU. So don't make PREEMPT part of this, just test the CPU in the mask directly. Anyway, I think that warning is appropriate and useful. So the next step is to figure out what work item was involved and why that work item got executed on the wrong CPU. Bart.
Christian Borntraeger
2017-Nov-20 19:29 UTC
4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk
On 11/20/2017 08:20 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 15:42 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> This is >> >> b7a71e66d (Jens Axboe 2017-08-01 09:28:24 -0600 1141) * are mapped to it. >> b7a71e66d (Jens Axboe 2017-08-01 09:28:24 -0600 1142) */ >> 6a83e74d2 (Bart Van Assche 2016-11-02 10:09:51 -0600 1143) WARN_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask) && >> 6a83e74d2 (Bart Van Assche 2016-11-02 10:09:51 -0600 1144) cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu)); >> 6a83e74d2 (Bart Van Assche 2016-11-02 10:09:51 -0600 1145) >> b7a71e66d (Jens Axboe 2017-08-01 09:28:24 -0600 1146) /* > > Did you really try to figure out when the code that reported the warning > was introduced? I think that warning was introduced through the following > commit:This was more a cut'n'paste to show which warning triggered since line numbers are somewhat volatile.> > commit fd1270d5df6a005e1248e87042159a799cc4b2c9 > Date: Wed Apr 16 09:23:48 2014 -0600 > > blk-mq: don't use preempt_count() to check for right CPU > > UP or CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE will return 0, and what we really > want to check is whether or not we are on the right CPU. > So don't make PREEMPT part of this, just test the CPU in > the mask directly. > > Anyway, I think that warning is appropriate and useful. So the next step > is to figure out what work item was involved and why that work item got > executed on the wrong CPU.It seems to be related to virtio-blk (is triggered by fio on such disks). Your comment basically says: "no this is not a known issue" then :-) I will try to take a dump to find out the work item
Reasonably Related Threads
- 4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk
- 4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk (also 4.12 stable)
- 4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk (also 4.12 stable)
- 4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk
- 4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with virtio-blk