Wanpeng Li
2016-Jul-06 06:46 UTC
[PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
Cc Paolo, kvm ml 2016-07-06 12:58 GMT+08:00 xinhui <xinhui.pan at linux.vnet.ibm.com>:> Hi, wanpeng > > On 2016?07?05? 17:57, Wanpeng Li wrote: >> >> Hi Xinhui, >> 2016-06-28 22:43 GMT+08:00 Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan at linux.vnet.ibm.com>: >>> >>> This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks >>> implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself. Currently >>> kernel has an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It take the >>> cpu >>> as parameter and return true if the cpu is preempted. Then kernel can >>> break >>> the spin loops upon on the retval of vcpu_is_preempted. >>> >>> As kernel has used this interface, So lets support it. >>> >>> Only pSeries need supoort it. And the fact is powerNV are built into same >>> kernel image with pSeries. So we need return false if we are runnig as >>> powerNV. The another fact is that lppaca->yiled_count keeps zero on >>> powerNV. So we can just skip the machine type. >> >> >> Lock holder vCPU preemption can be detected by hardware pSeries or >> paravirt method? >> > There is one shard struct between kernel and powerVM/KVM. And we read the > yield_count of this struct to detect if one vcpu is running or not. > SO it's easy for ppc to implement such interface. Note that yield_count is > set by powerVM/KVM. > and only pSeries can run a guest for now. :) > > I also review x86 related code, looks like we need add one hyer-call to get > such vcpu preemption info?There is no such stuff to record lock holder in x86 kvm, maybe we don't need to depend on PLE handler algorithm to guess it if we can know lock holder vCPU directly. Regards, Wanpeng Li
Peter Zijlstra
2016-Jul-06 07:58 UTC
[PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:46:34PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:> > SO it's easy for ppc to implement such interface. Note that yield_count is > > set by powerVM/KVM. > > and only pSeries can run a guest for now. :) > > > > I also review x86 related code, looks like we need add one hyer-call to get > > such vcpu preemption info? > > There is no such stuff to record lock holder in x86 kvm, maybe we > don't need to depend on PLE handler algorithm to guess it if we can > know lock holder vCPU directly.x86/kvm has vcpu->preempted to indicate if a vcpu is currently preempted or not. I'm just not sure if that is visible to the guest or how to make it so.
Wanpeng Li
2016-Jul-06 08:32 UTC
[PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
2016-07-06 15:58 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>:> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:46:34PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote: >> > SO it's easy for ppc to implement such interface. Note that yield_count is >> > set by powerVM/KVM. >> > and only pSeries can run a guest for now. :) >> > >> > I also review x86 related code, looks like we need add one hyer-call to get >> > such vcpu preemption info? >> >> There is no such stuff to record lock holder in x86 kvm, maybe we >> don't need to depend on PLE handler algorithm to guess it if we can >> know lock holder vCPU directly. > > x86/kvm has vcpu->preempted to indicate if a vcpu is currently preempted > or not. I'm just not sure if that is visible to the guest or how to make > it so.Yeah, I miss it. I can be the volunteer to do it if there is any idea, ping Paolo. :) Regards, Wanpeng Li
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
- [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
- [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
- [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check
- [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check