Jason Wang
2015-Dec-01 05:14 UTC
[PATCH net-next 2/3] vhost: introduce vhost_vq_more_avail()
On 11/30/2015 04:22 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:11:28PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> >> --- >> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++--------- >> drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 1 + >> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c >> index 163b365..b86c5aa 100644 >> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c >> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c >> @@ -1633,10 +1633,25 @@ void vhost_add_used_and_signal_n(struct vhost_dev *dev, >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_add_used_and_signal_n); >> >> +bool vhost_vq_more_avail(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) >> +{ >> + __virtio16 avail_idx; >> + int r; >> + >> + r = __get_user(avail_idx, &vq->avail->idx); >> + if (r) { >> + vq_err(vq, "Failed to check avail idx at %p: %d\n", >> + &vq->avail->idx, r); >> + return false; > In patch 3 you are calling this under preempt disable, > so this actually can fail and it isn't a VQ error. >Yes.>> + } >> + >> + return vhost16_to_cpu(vq, avail_idx) != vq->avail_idx; >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_vq_more_avail); >> + >> /* OK, now we need to know about added descriptors. */ >> bool vhost_enable_notify(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) >> { >> - __virtio16 avail_idx; >> int r; >> >> if (!(vq->used_flags & VRING_USED_F_NO_NOTIFY)) >> @@ -1660,14 +1675,7 @@ bool vhost_enable_notify(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) >> /* They could have slipped one in as we were doing that: make >> * sure it's written, then check again. */ >> smp_mb(); >> - r = __get_user(avail_idx, &vq->avail->idx); >> - if (r) { >> - vq_err(vq, "Failed to check avail idx at %p: %d\n", >> - &vq->avail->idx, r); >> - return false; >> - } >> - >> - return vhost16_to_cpu(vq, avail_idx) != vq->avail_idx; >> + return vhost_vq_more_avail(dev, vq); >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_enable_notify); >> > This path does need an error though. > It's probably easier to just leave this call site alone.Ok, will leave this function as is and remove the vq_err() in vhost_vq_more_avail(). Thanks> >> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h >> index 43284ad..2f3c57c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h >> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h >> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ void vhost_add_used_and_signal_n(struct vhost_dev *, struct vhost_virtqueue *, >> struct vring_used_elem *heads, unsigned count); >> void vhost_signal(struct vhost_dev *, struct vhost_virtqueue *); >> void vhost_disable_notify(struct vhost_dev *, struct vhost_virtqueue *); >> +bool vhost_vq_more_avail(struct vhost_dev *, struct vhost_virtqueue *); >> bool vhost_enable_notify(struct vhost_dev *, struct vhost_virtqueue *); >> >> int vhost_log_write(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, struct vhost_log *log, >> -- >> 2.5.0
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [PATCH net-next 2/3] vhost: introduce vhost_vq_more_avail()
- [PATCH V2 2/3] vhost: introduce vhost_vq_more_avail()
- [PATCH V2 2/3] vhost: introduce vhost_vq_more_avail()
- [PATCH V2 2/3] vhost: introduce vhost_vq_more_avail()
- [PATCH V2 0/3] basic busy polling support for vhost_net