Hi,> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&vi->lock, flags); > > + while ((event = virtqueue_get_buf(vi->evt, &len)) != NULL) { > > + input_event(vi->idev, > > + le16_to_cpu(event->type), > > + le16_to_cpu(event->code), > > + le32_to_cpu(event->value)); > > What happens if input layer gets an > unexpected event code or value?input layer checks it and ignores events not supported (according to the support bitmaps).> > +static int virtinput_send_status(struct virtio_input *vi, > > + u16 type, u16 code, s32 value) > > +{> This means that caller will get errors if it happens to call > send_status at a rate that's faster than host's consumption of them. > To me this looks wrong. > Poking at input layer, it seems to simply discard errors. > Is it always safe to discard status updates?Typical use case is updating the leds of your keyboard. Loosing one update isn't the end of the world. Also that are _very_ low rate events, and in case that really actually happens you likely have bigger problems anyway ;)> > +static void virtinput_cfg_bits(struct virtio_input *vi, int select, int subsel, > > + unsigned long *bits, unsigned int bitcount) > > +{ > > + unsigned int bit; > > + size_t bytes; > > + u8 *virtio_bits; > > + > > + bytes = virtinput_cfg_select(vi, select, subsel); > > + if (!bytes) > > + return; > > How about limiting bytes to sizeof struct virtio_input_config->u?It's limited to 256 anyway because size is u8 in config space.> > + size = virtinput_cfg_select(vi, VIRTIO_INPUT_CFG_ID_DEVIDS, 0); > > + if (size >= 8) { > > What does 8 mean here? Should be sizeof virtio_input_devids?Yes, fixed.> > +struct virtio_input_config { > > + __u8 select; > > + __u8 subsel; > > + __u8 size; > > + __u8 reserved; > > + union { > > + char string[128]; > > + __u8 bitmap[128]; > > I note that neither string nor bitmap are used by > driver. What are they in aid of?Fixed. Just sloppy coding, the name should use u.string, the bitmap u.bitmap, instead of just "u" (although for offsetof it doesn't make a difference). cheers, Gerd
Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-Mar-24 13:02 UTC
[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v3] Add virtio-input driver.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:46:21PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:> Hi, > > > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&vi->lock, flags); > > > + while ((event = virtqueue_get_buf(vi->evt, &len)) != NULL) { > > > + input_event(vi->idev, > > > + le16_to_cpu(event->type), > > > + le16_to_cpu(event->code), > > > + le32_to_cpu(event->value)); > > > > What happens if input layer gets an > > unexpected event code or value? > > input layer checks it and ignores events not supported (according to the > support bitmaps).Right but support bitmaps come from host too, no?> > > +static int virtinput_send_status(struct virtio_input *vi, > > > + u16 type, u16 code, s32 value) > > > +{ > > > This means that caller will get errors if it happens to call > > send_status at a rate that's faster than host's consumption of them. > > To me this looks wrong. > > Poking at input layer, it seems to simply discard errors. > > Is it always safe to discard status updates? > > Typical use case is updating the leds of your keyboard. Loosing one > update isn't the end of the world. Also that are _very_ low rate > events, and in case that really actually happens you likely have bigger > problems anyway ;)Until QE opens a bug report I guess :) OK but pls add a comment.> > > +static void virtinput_cfg_bits(struct virtio_input *vi, int select, int subsel, > > > + unsigned long *bits, unsigned int bitcount) > > > +{ > > > + unsigned int bit; > > > + size_t bytes; > > > + u8 *virtio_bits; > > > + > > > + bytes = virtinput_cfg_select(vi, select, subsel); > > > + if (!bytes) > > > + return; > > > > How about limiting bytes to sizeof struct virtio_input_config->u? > > It's limited to 256 anyway because size is u8 in config space.That struct is 128 bytes though. Also, change bytes and virtinput_cfg_select to be u8 to make this clearer?> > > + size = virtinput_cfg_select(vi, VIRTIO_INPUT_CFG_ID_DEVIDS, 0); > > > + if (size >= 8) { > > > > What does 8 mean here? Should be sizeof virtio_input_devids? > > Yes, fixed. > > > > +struct virtio_input_config { > > > + __u8 select; > > > + __u8 subsel; > > > + __u8 size; > > > + __u8 reserved; > > > + union { > > > + char string[128]; > > > + __u8 bitmap[128]; > > > > I note that neither string nor bitmap are used by > > driver. What are they in aid of? > > Fixed. Just sloppy coding, the name should use u.string, the bitmap > u.bitmap, instead of just "u" (although for offsetof it doesn't make a > difference). > > cheers, > Gerd >
Hi,> > input layer checks it and ignores events not supported (according to the > > support bitmaps). > > Right but support bitmaps come from host too, no?Yes, but the driver will not set invalid bits (bitcount argument for the virtinput_cfg_bits() function is the number of valid bits of the specific bitmap). cheers, Gerd
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v3] Add virtio-input driver.
- [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v3] Add virtio-input driver.
- [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v3] Add virtio-input driver.
- [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v3] Add virtio-input driver.
- [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v3] Add virtio-input driver.