Jason Wang
2014-Oct-15 10:19 UTC
[RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] virtio: introduce virtio_enable_cb_avail()
On 10/15/2014 05:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 03:25:26PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> This patch introduces virtio_enable_cb_avail() to publish avail idx >> and used event. This could be used by batched buffer submitting to >> reduce the number of tx interrupts. >> >> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> >> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> >> --- >> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- >> include/linux/virtio.h | 2 ++ >> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c >> index 1b3929f..d67fbf8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c >> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c >> @@ -567,14 +567,32 @@ unsigned virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare(struct virtqueue *_vq) >> * entry. Always do both to keep code simple. */ >> vq->vring.avail->flags &= ~VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT; >> /* Make sure used event never go backwards */ >> - if (!vring_need_event(vring_used_event(&vq->vring), >> - vq->vring.avail->idx, last_used_idx)) >> + if (vq->vring.avail->idx != vring_used_event(&vq->vring) && >> + !vring_need_event(vring_used_event(&vq->vring), >> + vq->vring.avail->idx, last_used_idx)) { >> vring_used_event(&vq->vring) = last_used_idx; >> + } >> END_USE(vq); >> return last_used_idx; >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare); >> > I see you are also changing virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare, why?This is also used to prevent it from moving the used event backwards. This may happens when we handle tx napi after we publish avail idx as used event (virtqueue_enable_cb_avail() was called).> >> +bool virtqueue_enable_cb_avail(struct virtqueue *_vq) >> +{ >> + struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq); >> + bool ret; >> + >> + START_USE(vq); >> + vq->vring.avail->flags &= ~VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT; >> + vring_used_event(&vq->vring) = vq->vring.avail->idx; >> + ret = vring_need_event(vq->vring.avail->idx, >> + vq->last_used_idx, vq->vring.used->idx); >> + END_USE(vq); >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_enable_cb_avail); >> + >> /** >> * virtqueue_poll - query pending used buffers >> * @vq: the struct virtqueue we're talking about. > Could not figure out what this does. > Please add documentation. >Sure, does something like below explain what does this function do? /** * virtqueue_enable_cb_avail - restart callbacks after disable_cb. * @vq: the struct virtqueue we're talking about. * * This re-enables callbacks but hints to the other side to delay * interrupts all of the available buffers have been processed; * it returns "false" if there are at least one pending buffer in the queue, * to detect a possible race between the driver checking for more work, * and enabling callbacks. * * Caller must ensure we don't call this with other virtqueue * operations at the same time (except where noted). */>> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio.h b/include/linux/virtio.h >> index b46671e..bfaf058 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/virtio.h >> +++ b/include/linux/virtio.h >> @@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ bool virtqueue_enable_cb(struct virtqueue *vq); >> >> unsigned virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare(struct virtqueue *vq); >> >> +bool virtqueue_enable_cb_avail(struct virtqueue *vq); >> + >> bool virtqueue_poll(struct virtqueue *vq, unsigned); >> >> bool virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(struct virtqueue *vq); >> -- >> 1.7.1 > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-Oct-15 10:41 UTC
[RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] virtio: introduce virtio_enable_cb_avail()
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 06:19:15PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:> On 10/15/2014 05:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 03:25:26PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >> This patch introduces virtio_enable_cb_avail() to publish avail idx > >> and used event. This could be used by batched buffer submitting to > >> reduce the number of tx interrupts. > >> > >> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> > >> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- > >> include/linux/virtio.h | 2 ++ > >> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > >> index 1b3929f..d67fbf8 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > >> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > >> @@ -567,14 +567,32 @@ unsigned virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare(struct virtqueue *_vq) > >> * entry. Always do both to keep code simple. */ > >> vq->vring.avail->flags &= ~VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT; > >> /* Make sure used event never go backwards */ > >> - if (!vring_need_event(vring_used_event(&vq->vring), > >> - vq->vring.avail->idx, last_used_idx)) > >> + if (vq->vring.avail->idx != vring_used_event(&vq->vring) && > >> + !vring_need_event(vring_used_event(&vq->vring), > >> + vq->vring.avail->idx, last_used_idx)) { > >> vring_used_event(&vq->vring) = last_used_idx; > >> + } > >> END_USE(vq); > >> return last_used_idx; > >> } > >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare); > >> > > I see you are also changing virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare, why? > > This is also used to prevent it from moving the used event backwards. > This may happens when we handle tx napi after we publish avail idx as > used event (virtqueue_enable_cb_avail() was called).So it's wrong exactly in the same way. But also, please document this stuff, don't put unrelated changes in a patch called "introduce virtqueue_enable_cb_avail".> > > >> +bool virtqueue_enable_cb_avail(struct virtqueue *_vq) > >> +{ > >> + struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq); > >> + bool ret; > >> + > >> + START_USE(vq); > >> + vq->vring.avail->flags &= ~VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT; > >> + vring_used_event(&vq->vring) = vq->vring.avail->idx; > >> + ret = vring_need_event(vq->vring.avail->idx, > >> + vq->last_used_idx, vq->vring.used->idx); > >> + END_USE(vq); > >> + > >> + return ret; > >> +} > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_enable_cb_avail); > >> + > >> /** > >> * virtqueue_poll - query pending used buffers > >> * @vq: the struct virtqueue we're talking about. > > Could not figure out what this does. > > Please add documentation. > > > > Sure, does something like below explain what does this function do? > > /** > > * virtqueue_enable_cb_avail - restart callbacks after > disable_cb. > * @vq: the struct virtqueue we're talking > about. > * > > * This re-enables callbacks but hints to the other side to > delay > * interrupts all of the available buffers have been processed;So this is like virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed but even more aggressive? I think it's too agressive: it's better to wake up guest after you are through most of buffers, but not all, so guest and host can work in parallel.> * it returns "false" if there are at least one pending buffer in the > queue, > * to detect a possible race between the driver checking for more > work, > * and enabling > callbacks. > * > > * Caller must ensure we don't call this with other > virtqueue > * operations at the same time (except where > noted). > */ > > >> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio.h b/include/linux/virtio.h > >> index b46671e..bfaf058 100644 > >> --- a/include/linux/virtio.h > >> +++ b/include/linux/virtio.h > >> @@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ bool virtqueue_enable_cb(struct virtqueue *vq); > >> > >> unsigned virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare(struct virtqueue *vq); > >> > >> +bool virtqueue_enable_cb_avail(struct virtqueue *vq); > >> + > >> bool virtqueue_poll(struct virtqueue *vq, unsigned); > >> > >> bool virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(struct virtqueue *vq); > >> -- > >> 1.7.1 > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Jason Wang
2014-Oct-15 10:58 UTC
[RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] virtio: introduce virtio_enable_cb_avail()
On 10/15/2014 06:41 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 06:19:15PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 10/15/2014 05:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 03:25:26PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> This patch introduces virtio_enable_cb_avail() to publish avail idx >>>> and used event. This could be used by batched buffer submitting to >>>> reduce the number of tx interrupts. >>>> >>>> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> >>>> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- >>>> include/linux/virtio.h | 2 ++ >>>> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c >>>> index 1b3929f..d67fbf8 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c >>>> @@ -567,14 +567,32 @@ unsigned virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare(struct virtqueue *_vq) >>>> * entry. Always do both to keep code simple. */ >>>> vq->vring.avail->flags &= ~VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT; >>>> /* Make sure used event never go backwards */ >>>> - if (!vring_need_event(vring_used_event(&vq->vring), >>>> - vq->vring.avail->idx, last_used_idx)) >>>> + if (vq->vring.avail->idx != vring_used_event(&vq->vring) && >>>> + !vring_need_event(vring_used_event(&vq->vring), >>>> + vq->vring.avail->idx, last_used_idx)) { >>>> vring_used_event(&vq->vring) = last_used_idx; >>>> + } >>>> END_USE(vq); >>>> return last_used_idx; >>>> } >>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare); >>>> >>> I see you are also changing virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare, why? >> This is also used to prevent it from moving the used event backwards. >> This may happens when we handle tx napi after we publish avail idx as >> used event (virtqueue_enable_cb_avail() was called). > So it's wrong exactly in the same way. > > But also, please document this stuff, don't put > unrelated changes in a patch called "introduce > virtqueue_enable_cb_avail". > > >>>> +bool virtqueue_enable_cb_avail(struct virtqueue *_vq) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq); >>>> + bool ret; >>>> + >>>> + START_USE(vq); >>>> + vq->vring.avail->flags &= ~VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT; >>>> + vring_used_event(&vq->vring) = vq->vring.avail->idx; >>>> + ret = vring_need_event(vq->vring.avail->idx, >>>> + vq->last_used_idx, vq->vring.used->idx); >>>> + END_USE(vq); >>>> + >>>> + return ret; >>>> +} >>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_enable_cb_avail); >>>> + >>>> /** >>>> * virtqueue_poll - query pending used buffers >>>> * @vq: the struct virtqueue we're talking about. >>> Could not figure out what this does. >>> Please add documentation. >>> >> Sure, does something like below explain what does this function do? >> >> /** >> >> * virtqueue_enable_cb_avail - restart callbacks after >> disable_cb. >> * @vq: the struct virtqueue we're talking >> about. >> * >> >> * This re-enables callbacks but hints to the other side to >> delay >> * interrupts all of the available buffers have been processed; > > So this is like virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed but even more > aggressive? > I think it's too agressive: it's better to wake up guest > after you are through most of buffers, but not all, > so guest and host can work in parallel.Note that: - it was only used when there are still few of free slots (which is greater than 2 + MAX_SKB_FRAGS) - my patch keeps the free_old_xmit_skbs() in the beginning of start_xmit(), so the tx skb reclaiming does not depends totally on tx interrupt. If more packets comes, we'd expect some of them were freed in ndo_start_xmit(). If not, finally we may trigger the virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(). So probably not as aggressive as it looks. I will do benchmark on this.> > >> * it returns "false" if there are at least one pending buffer in the >> queue, >> * to detect a possible race between the driver checking for more >> work, >> * and enabling >> callbacks. >> * >> >> * Caller must ensure we don't call this with other >> virtqueue >> * operations at the same time (except where >> noted). >> */ >> >>>> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio.h b/include/linux/virtio.h >>>> index b46671e..bfaf058 100644 >>>> --- a/include/linux/virtio.h >>>> +++ b/include/linux/virtio.h >>>> @@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ bool virtqueue_enable_cb(struct virtqueue *vq); >>>> >>>> unsigned virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare(struct virtqueue *vq); >>>> >>>> +bool virtqueue_enable_cb_avail(struct virtqueue *vq); >>>> + >>>> bool virtqueue_poll(struct virtqueue *vq, unsigned); >>>> >>>> bool virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(struct virtqueue *vq); >>>> -- >>>> 1.7.1 >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] virtio: introduce virtio_enable_cb_avail()
- [RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] virtio: introduce virtio_enable_cb_avail()
- [RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] virtio: introduce virtio_enable_cb_avail()
- [RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] virtio: introduce virtio_enable_cb_avail()
- [RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] virtio: introduce virtio_enable_cb_avail()