Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-Jun-22 10:24 UTC
[PATCH v1 2/2] block: virtio-blk: support multi virt queues per virtio-blk device
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:29:40PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:> Firstly this patch supports more than one virtual queues for virtio-blk > device. > > Secondly this patch maps the virtual queue to blk-mq's hardware queue. > > With this approach, both scalability and performance can be improved. > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei at canonical.com> > --- > drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > index f63d358..7c3d686 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ > > #define PART_BITS 4 > > +#define MAX_NUM_VQ 16 > + > static int major; > static DEFINE_IDA(vd_index_ida); >Does it work much worse if we just use as many queues as hardware supports, allocating as much memory as necessary?> @@ -24,8 +26,8 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *virtblk_wq; > struct virtio_blk > { > struct virtio_device *vdev; > - struct virtqueue *vq; > - spinlock_t vq_lock; > + struct virtqueue *vq[MAX_NUM_VQ]; > + spinlock_t vq_lock[MAX_NUM_VQ];array of struct { *vq; spinlock_t lock; } would use more memory but would get us better locality. It might even make sense to add padding to avoid cacheline sharing between two unrelated VQs. Want to try?> > /* The disk structure for the kernel. */ > struct gendisk *disk; > @@ -47,6 +49,9 @@ struct virtio_blk > > /* Ida index - used to track minor number allocations. */ > int index; > + > + /* num of vqs */ > + int num_vqs; > }; > > struct virtblk_req > @@ -133,14 +138,15 @@ static void virtblk_done(struct virtqueue *vq) > { > struct virtio_blk *vblk = vq->vdev->priv; > bool req_done = false; > + int qid = vq->index; > struct virtblk_req *vbr; > unsigned long flags; > unsigned int len; > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock, flags); > + spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock[qid], flags); > do { > virtqueue_disable_cb(vq); > - while ((vbr = virtqueue_get_buf(vblk->vq, &len)) != NULL) { > + while ((vbr = virtqueue_get_buf(vblk->vq[qid], &len)) != NULL) { > blk_mq_complete_request(vbr->req); > req_done = true; > } > @@ -151,7 +157,7 @@ static void virtblk_done(struct virtqueue *vq) > /* In case queue is stopped waiting for more buffers. */ > if (req_done) > blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queues(vblk->disk->queue, true); > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vq_lock, flags); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vq_lock[qid], flags); > } > > static int virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *req) > @@ -160,6 +166,7 @@ static int virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *req) > struct virtblk_req *vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req); > unsigned long flags; > unsigned int num; > + int qid = hctx->queue_num; > const bool last = (req->cmd_flags & REQ_END) != 0; > int err; > bool notify = false; > @@ -202,12 +209,12 @@ static int virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *req) > vbr->out_hdr.type |= VIRTIO_BLK_T_IN; > } > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock, flags); > - err = __virtblk_add_req(vblk->vq, vbr, vbr->sg, num); > + spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock[qid], flags); > + err = __virtblk_add_req(vblk->vq[qid], vbr, vbr->sg, num); > if (err) { > - virtqueue_kick(vblk->vq); > + virtqueue_kick(vblk->vq[qid]); > blk_mq_stop_hw_queue(hctx); > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vq_lock, flags); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vq_lock[qid], flags); > /* Out of mem doesn't actually happen, since we fall back > * to direct descriptors */ > if (err == -ENOMEM || err == -ENOSPC) > @@ -215,12 +222,12 @@ static int virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *req) > return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_ERROR; > } > > - if (last && virtqueue_kick_prepare(vblk->vq)) > + if (last && virtqueue_kick_prepare(vblk->vq[qid])) > notify = true; > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vq_lock, flags); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vq_lock[qid], flags); > > if (notify) > - virtqueue_notify(vblk->vq); > + virtqueue_notify(vblk->vq[qid]); > return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_OK; > } > > @@ -377,12 +384,35 @@ static void virtblk_config_changed(struct virtio_device *vdev) > static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk) > { > int err = 0; > + int i; > + vq_callback_t *callbacks[MAX_NUM_VQ]; > + const char *names[MAX_NUM_VQ]; > + unsigned short num_vqs; > + struct virtio_device *vdev = vblk->vdev; > > - /* We expect one virtqueue, for output. */ > - vblk->vq = virtio_find_single_vq(vblk->vdev, virtblk_done, "requests"); > - if (IS_ERR(vblk->vq)) > - err = PTR_ERR(vblk->vq); > + err = virtio_cread_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ, > + struct virtio_blk_config, num_queues, > + &num_vqs); > + if (err) > + num_vqs = 1; > + if (num_vqs > MAX_NUM_VQ) > + num_vqs = MAX_NUM_VQ; > > + for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) { > + callbacks[i] = virtblk_done; > + names[i] = "requests"; > + } > +This will name all VQs the same which makes debugging harder. Better give each one a distinct name.> + /* Discover virtqueues and write information to configuration. */ > + err = vdev->config->find_vqs(vdev, num_vqs, vblk->vq, > + callbacks, names); > + if (err) > + goto out; > + > + for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) > + spin_lock_init(&vblk->vq_lock[i]); > + vblk->num_vqs = num_vqs; > +out: > return err; > } > > @@ -551,7 +581,6 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > err = init_vq(vblk); > if (err) > goto out_free_vblk; > - spin_lock_init(&vblk->vq_lock); > > /* FIXME: How many partitions? How long is a piece of string? */ > vblk->disk = alloc_disk(1 << PART_BITS); > @@ -562,7 +591,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > /* Default queue sizing is to fill the ring. */ > if (!virtblk_queue_depth) { > - virtblk_queue_depth = vblk->vq->num_free; > + virtblk_queue_depth = vblk->vq[0]->num_free; > /* ... but without indirect descs, we use 2 descs per req */ > if (!virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC)) > virtblk_queue_depth /= 2; > @@ -570,7 +599,6 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > memset(&vblk->tag_set, 0, sizeof(vblk->tag_set)); > vblk->tag_set.ops = &virtio_mq_ops; > - vblk->tag_set.nr_hw_queues = 1; > vblk->tag_set.queue_depth = virtblk_queue_depth; > vblk->tag_set.numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE; > vblk->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE; > @@ -578,6 +606,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > sizeof(struct virtblk_req) + > sizeof(struct scatterlist) * sg_elems; > vblk->tag_set.driver_data = vblk; > + vblk->tag_set.nr_hw_queues = vblk->num_vqs; > > err = blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(&vblk->tag_set); > if (err) > @@ -777,7 +806,8 @@ static const struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = { > static unsigned int features[] = { > VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_GEOMETRY, > VIRTIO_BLK_F_RO, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI, > - VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE, VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY, VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE > + VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE, VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY, VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE, > + VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ, > }; > > static struct virtio_driver virtio_blk = { > -- > 1.7.9.5
Dave Chinner
2014-Jun-23 03:42 UTC
[PATCH v1 2/2] block: virtio-blk: support multi virt queues per virtio-blk device
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 01:24:48PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:29:40PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > @@ -24,8 +26,8 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *virtblk_wq; > > struct virtio_blk > > { > > struct virtio_device *vdev; > > - struct virtqueue *vq; > > - spinlock_t vq_lock; > > + struct virtqueue *vq[MAX_NUM_VQ]; > > + spinlock_t vq_lock[MAX_NUM_VQ]; > > array of struct { > *vq; > spinlock_t lock; > } > would use more memory but would get us better locality. > It might even make sense to add padding to avoid > cacheline sharing between two unrelated VQs. > Want to try?It's still false sharing because the queue objects share cachelines. To operate without contention they have to be physically separated from each other like so: struct vq { struct virtqueue *q; spinlock_t lock; } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; struct some_other_struct { .... struct vq vq[MAX_NUM_VQ]; .... }; This keeps locality to objects within a queue, but separates each queue onto it's own cacheline.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david at fromorbit.com
Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-Jun-23 06:47 UTC
[PATCH v1 2/2] block: virtio-blk: support multi virt queues per virtio-blk device
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:42:51PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 01:24:48PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:29:40PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > > @@ -24,8 +26,8 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *virtblk_wq; > > > struct virtio_blk > > > { > > > struct virtio_device *vdev; > > > - struct virtqueue *vq; > > > - spinlock_t vq_lock; > > > + struct virtqueue *vq[MAX_NUM_VQ]; > > > + spinlock_t vq_lock[MAX_NUM_VQ]; > > > > array of struct { > > *vq; > > spinlock_t lock; > > } > > would use more memory but would get us better locality. > > It might even make sense to add padding to avoid > > cacheline sharing between two unrelated VQs. > > Want to try? > > It's still false sharing because the queue objects share cachelines. > To operate without contention they have to be physically separated > from each other like so: > > struct vq { > struct virtqueue *q; > spinlock_t lock; > } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;Exacly, that's what I meant by padding above.> struct some_other_struct { > .... > struct vq vq[MAX_NUM_VQ]; > .... > }; > > This keeps locality to objects within a queue, but separates each > queue onto it's own cacheline.... > > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david at fromorbit.comTo reduce the amount of memory wasted, we could add the lock in the VQ itself. Wastes 8 bytes of memory for devices which don't need it, but we can save it elsewhere (e.g. get rid of the list and the priv pointer). How's this? Your patch would go on top. Care benchmarking and telling us whether it makes sense? If yes please let me know and I'll send an official patchset. --> virtio-blk: move spinlock to vq itself Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> -- diff --git a/include/linux/virtio.h b/include/linux/virtio.h index b46671e..0951b21 100644 --- a/include/linux/virtio.h +++ b/include/linux/virtio.h @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ * @priv: a pointer for the virtqueue implementation to use. * @index: the zero-based ordinal number for this queue. * @num_free: number of elements we expect to be able to fit. + * @lock: lock for optional use by devices. If used, devices must initialize it. * * A note on @num_free: with indirect buffers, each buffer needs one * element in the queue, otherwise a buffer will need one element per @@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ struct virtqueue { struct virtio_device *vdev; unsigned int index; unsigned int num_free; + spinlock_t lock; void *priv; }; diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c index f63d358..a3cdc19 100644 --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ struct virtio_blk { struct virtio_device *vdev; struct virtqueue *vq; - spinlock_t vq_lock; /* The disk structure for the kernel. */ struct gendisk *disk; @@ -137,7 +136,7 @@ static void virtblk_done(struct virtqueue *vq) unsigned long flags; unsigned int len; - spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq->lock, flags); do { virtqueue_disable_cb(vq); while ((vbr = virtqueue_get_buf(vblk->vq, &len)) != NULL) { @@ -151,7 +150,7 @@ static void virtblk_done(struct virtqueue *vq) /* In case queue is stopped waiting for more buffers. */ if (req_done) blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queues(vblk->disk->queue, true); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vq_lock, flags); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vq->lock, flags); } static int virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *req) @@ -202,12 +201,12 @@ static int virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *req) vbr->out_hdr.type |= VIRTIO_BLK_T_IN; } - spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq->lock, flags); err = __virtblk_add_req(vblk->vq, vbr, vbr->sg, num); if (err) { virtqueue_kick(vblk->vq); blk_mq_stop_hw_queue(hctx); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vq_lock, flags); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vq->lock, flags); /* Out of mem doesn't actually happen, since we fall back * to direct descriptors */ if (err == -ENOMEM || err == -ENOSPC) @@ -217,7 +216,7 @@ static int virtio_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *req) if (last && virtqueue_kick_prepare(vblk->vq)) notify = true; - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vq_lock, flags); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vq->lock, flags); if (notify) virtqueue_notify(vblk->vq); @@ -551,7 +550,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) err = init_vq(vblk); if (err) goto out_free_vblk; - spin_lock_init(&vblk->vq_lock); + spin_lock_init(&vblk->vq->lock); /* FIXME: How many partitions? How long is a piece of string? */ vblk->disk = alloc_disk(1 << PART_BITS);
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [PATCH v1 2/2] block: virtio-blk: support multi virt queues per virtio-blk device
- [PATCH v1 2/2] block: virtio-blk: support multi virt queues per virtio-blk device
- [PATCH v1 2/2] block: virtio-blk: support multi virt queues per virtio-blk device
- [RFC PATCH 2/2] block: virtio-blk: support multi virt queues per virtio-blk device
- [PATCH v2 2/2] block: virtio-blk: support multi virt queues per virtio-blk device