On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:09:23PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:> Should we get more ambitious and start a fake-kernel/ directory where > we can put userspace equivs/stubs of kernel functionality?Dunno - people like to do that now, it seems. In any case, cleanups and unifications like that would definitely help if we decide to do that because, in this particular example, we have only one export.h to go and fish out. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --
Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de> writes:> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:09:23PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: >> Should we get more ambitious and start a fake-kernel/ directory where >> we can put userspace equivs/stubs of kernel functionality? > > Dunno - people like to do that now, it seems. > > In any case, cleanups and unifications like that would definitely help > if we decide to do that because, in this particular example, we have > only one export.h to go and fish out.Agreed. Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cheers, Rusty
Em Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:52:02PM +1030, Rusty Russell escreveu:> Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de> writes: > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:09:23PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > >> Should we get more ambitious and start a fake-kernel/ directory where > >> we can put userspace equivs/stubs of kernel functionality? > > > > Dunno - people like to do that now, it seems. > > > > In any case, cleanups and unifications like that would definitely help > > if we decide to do that because, in this particular example, we have > > only one export.h to go and fish out. > > Agreed. > > Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>I'm ok with it as well and will stash it in my perf/core branch after a bit more time for others in the CC list to say something. - Arnaldo