Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-Nov-20 10:37 UTC
[PATCH net 2/3] virtio-net: fix num calculation on frag skb allocation failure
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:07:26PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:> We need decrease the rq->num after we can get a buf through > virtqueue_get_buf() even if we could not allocate frag skb. Otherwise, the > refill routine won't be triggered under heavy memory stress since the driver may > still think there's enough room. > > This bug was introduced by commit 2613af0ed18a11d5c566a81f9a6510b73180660a > (virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag allocators). > > Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > Cc: Michael Dalton <mwdalton at google.com> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet at google.com> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>So let's wrap virtqueue_get_buf to make sure we get it right?> --- > The patch was needed for 3.12 stable. > --- > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > index 24fd502..de1d6ca 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > @@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ static int receive_mergeable(struct receive_queue *rq, struct sk_buff *head_skb) > head_skb->dev->stats.rx_length_errors++; > return -EINVAL; > } > + --rq->num; > if (unlikely(len > MERGE_BUFFER_LEN)) { > pr_debug("%s: rx error: merge buffer too long\n", > head_skb->dev->name); > @@ -367,7 +368,6 @@ static int receive_mergeable(struct receive_queue *rq, struct sk_buff *head_skb) > skb_add_rx_frag(curr_skb, num_skb_frags, page, > offset, len, MERGE_BUFFER_LEN); > } > - --rq->num; > } > return 0; > } > -- > 1.8.3.2
Jason Wang
2013-Nov-20 12:08 UTC
[PATCH net 2/3] virtio-net: fix num calculation on frag skb allocation failure
----- ???? -----> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:07:26PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > We need decrease the rq->num after we can get a buf through > > virtqueue_get_buf() even if we could not allocate frag skb. Otherwise, the > > refill routine won't be triggered under heavy memory stress since the > > driver may > > still think there's enough room. > > > > This bug was introduced by commit 2613af0ed18a11d5c566a81f9a6510b73180660a > > (virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag allocators). > > > > Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> > > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > > Cc: Michael Dalton <mwdalton at google.com> > > Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet at google.com> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > > So let's wrap virtqueue_get_buf to make sure we get it right? >Ok. good idea.> > --- > > The patch was needed for 3.12 stable. > > --- > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > index 24fd502..de1d6ca 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > @@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ static int receive_mergeable(struct receive_queue *rq, > > struct sk_buff *head_skb) > > head_skb->dev->stats.rx_length_errors++; > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > + --rq->num; > > if (unlikely(len > MERGE_BUFFER_LEN)) { > > pr_debug("%s: rx error: merge buffer too long\n", > > head_skb->dev->name); > > @@ -367,7 +368,6 @@ static int receive_mergeable(struct receive_queue *rq, > > struct sk_buff *head_skb) > > skb_add_rx_frag(curr_skb, num_skb_frags, page, > > offset, len, MERGE_BUFFER_LEN); > > } > > - --rq->num; > > } > > return 0; > > } > > -- > > 1.8.3.2 >
Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-Nov-20 13:37 UTC
[PATCH net 2/3] virtio-net: fix num calculation on frag skb allocation failure
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 07:08:50AM -0500, Jason Wang wrote:> > > ----- ???? ----- > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:07:26PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > We need decrease the rq->num after we can get a buf through > > > virtqueue_get_buf() even if we could not allocate frag skb. Otherwise, the > > > refill routine won't be triggered under heavy memory stress since the > > > driver may > > > still think there's enough room. > > > > > > This bug was introduced by commit 2613af0ed18a11d5c566a81f9a6510b73180660a > > > (virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag allocators). > > > > > > Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> > > > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > > > Cc: Michael Dalton <mwdalton at google.com> > > > Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet at google.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > > > > So let's wrap virtqueue_get_buf to make sure we get it right? > > > > Ok. good idea.So I did this (below) but the compiler is not smart enough to avoid two branches on data path. So I'm not sure anymore: with my patch it's pretty clear how the code works. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> but I don't think we need to apply this. diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c index 11d9cc9..1cc2e43 100644 --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c @@ -296,6 +296,14 @@ static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct receive_queue *rq, return skb; } +static void *rq_get_buf(struct receive_queue *rq, unsigned int *len) +{ + void *buf = virtqueue_get_buf(rq->vq, len); + if (buf) + rq->num--; + return buf; +} + static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev, struct receive_queue *rq, void *buf, @@ -315,7 +323,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev, while (--num_buf) { int num_skb_frags; - buf = virtqueue_get_buf(rq->vq, &len); + buf = rq_get_buf(rq, &len); if (unlikely(!buf)) { pr_debug("%s: rx error: %d buffers out of %d missing\n", dev->name, num_buf, hdr->mhdr.num_buffers); @@ -329,7 +337,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev, } page = virt_to_head_page(buf); - --rq->num; num_skb_frags = skb_shinfo(curr_skb)->nr_frags; if (unlikely(num_skb_frags == MAX_SKB_FRAGS)) { @@ -370,7 +377,7 @@ err_buf: dev->stats.rx_dropped++; dev_kfree_skb(head_skb); while (--num_buf) { - buf = virtqueue_get_buf(rq->vq, &len); + buf = rq_get_buf(rq, &len); if (unlikely(!buf)) { pr_debug("%s: rx error: %d buffers missing\n", dev->name, num_buf); @@ -379,7 +386,6 @@ err_buf: } page = virt_to_head_page(buf); put_page(page); - --rq->num; } return NULL; } @@ -675,9 +681,8 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) again: while (received < budget && - (buf = virtqueue_get_buf(rq->vq, &len)) != NULL) { + (buf = rq_get_buf(rq, &len)) != NULL) { receive_buf(rq, buf, len); - --rq->num; received++; }
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [PATCH net 2/3] virtio-net: fix num calculation on frag skb allocation failure
- [PATCH net 2/3] virtio-net: fix num calculation on frag skb allocation failure
- [PATCH net 2/3] virtio-net: fix num calculation on frag skb allocation failure
- [PATCH net-next 2/3] virtio-net: use per-receive queue page frag alloc for mergeable bufs
- [PATCH net-next 3/4] virtio-net: use per-receive queue page frag alloc for mergeable bufs