Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-Jun-10 15:20 UTC
[PATCH for-2.6.35] virtio_net: fix oom handling on tx
virtio net will never try to overflow the TX ring, so the only reason add_buf may fail is out of memory. Thus, we can not stop the device until some request completes - there's no guarantee anything at all is outstanding. Make the error message clearer as well: error here does not indicate queue full. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 15 ++++++++------- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c index 85615a3..e48a06f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c @@ -563,7 +563,6 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev); int capacity; -again: /* Free up any pending old buffers before queueing new ones. */ free_old_xmit_skbs(vi); @@ -572,12 +571,14 @@ again: /* This can happen with OOM and indirect buffers. */ if (unlikely(capacity < 0)) { - netif_stop_queue(dev); - dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Unexpected full queue\n"); - if (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb(vi->svq))) { - virtqueue_disable_cb(vi->svq); - netif_start_queue(dev); - goto again; + if (net_ratelimit()) { + if (likely(capacity == -ENOMEM)) + dev_warn(&dev->dev, + "TX queue failure: out of memory\n"); + else + dev_warn(&dev->dev, + "Unexpected TX queue failure: %d\n", + capacity); } return NETDEV_TX_BUSY; } -- 1.7.1.12.g42b7f
Sridhar Samudrala
2010-Jun-10 17:17 UTC
[PATCH for-2.6.35] virtio_net: fix oom handling on tx
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 18:20 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:> virtio net will never try to overflow the TX ring, so the only reason > add_buf may fail is out of memory. Thus, we can not stop the > device until some request completes - there's no guarantee anything > at all is outstanding. > > Make the error message clearer as well: error here does not > indicate queue full. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 15 ++++++++------- > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > index 85615a3..e48a06f 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > @@ -563,7 +563,6 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) > struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev); > int capacity; > > -again: > /* Free up any pending old buffers before queueing new ones. */ > free_old_xmit_skbs(vi); > > @@ -572,12 +571,14 @@ again: > > /* This can happen with OOM and indirect buffers. */ > if (unlikely(capacity < 0)) { > - netif_stop_queue(dev); > - dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Unexpected full queue\n"); > - if (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb(vi->svq))) { > - virtqueue_disable_cb(vi->svq); > - netif_start_queue(dev); > - goto again; > + if (net_ratelimit()) { > + if (likely(capacity == -ENOMEM)) > + dev_warn(&dev->dev, > + "TX queue failure: out of memory\n"); > + else > + dev_warn(&dev->dev, > + "Unexpected TX queue failure: %d\n", > + capacity); > } > return NETDEV_TX_BUSY; > }It is not clear to me how xmit_skb() can return -ENOMEM. xmit_skb() calls virtqueue_add_buf_gfp() which can return -ENOSPC. Even vring_add_indirect() doesn't return -ENOMEM on kmalloc failure. Thanks Sridhar
Maybe Matching Threads
- [PATCH for-2.6.35] virtio_net: fix oom handling on tx
- virtio-net: tx queue was stopped
- virtio-net: tx queue was stopped
- [PATCH 2/4] virtio_net: return NETDEV_TX_BUSY instead of queueing an extra skb.
- [PATCH 2/4] virtio_net: return NETDEV_TX_BUSY instead of queueing an extra skb.