Alaa Mohamed
2022-May-05 15:09 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next v6 2/2] net: vxlan: Add extack support to vxlan_fdb_delete
This patch adds extack msg support to vxlan_fdb_delete and vxlan_fdb_parse. extack is used to propagate meaningful error msgs to the user of vxlan fdb netlink api Signed-off-by: Alaa Mohamed <eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am at gmail.com> --- changes in V2: - fix spelling vxlan_fdb_delete - add missing braces - edit error message --- changes in V3: fix errors reported by checkpatch.pl --- changes in V4: - fix errors reported by checkpatch.pl - edit commit message. --- changes in V5: - edit commit message --- drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c index ad0f2150cfdb..429ce2168971 100644 --- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c @@ -1129,19 +1129,25 @@ static void vxlan_fdb_dst_destroy(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan, struct vxlan_fdb *f, static int vxlan_fdb_parse(struct nlattr *tb[], struct vxlan_dev *vxlan, union vxlan_addr *ip, __be16 *port, __be32 *src_vni, - __be32 *vni, u32 *ifindex, u32 *nhid) + __be32 *vni, u32 *ifindex, u32 *nhid, + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) { struct net *net = dev_net(vxlan->dev); int err; if (tb[NDA_NH_ID] && (tb[NDA_DST] || tb[NDA_VNI] || tb[NDA_IFINDEX] || - tb[NDA_PORT])) - return -EINVAL; + tb[NDA_PORT])) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, + "DST, VNI, ifindex and port are mutually exclusive with NH_ID"); + return -EINVAL; + } if (tb[NDA_DST]) { err = vxlan_nla_get_addr(ip, tb[NDA_DST]); - if (err) + if (err) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Unsupported address family"); return err; + } } else { union vxlan_addr *remote = &vxlan->default_dst.remote_ip; @@ -1157,24 +1163,30 @@ static int vxlan_fdb_parse(struct nlattr *tb[], struct vxlan_dev *vxlan, } if (tb[NDA_PORT]) { - if (nla_len(tb[NDA_PORT]) != sizeof(__be16)) + if (nla_len(tb[NDA_PORT]) != sizeof(__be16)) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid vxlan port"); return -EINVAL; + } *port = nla_get_be16(tb[NDA_PORT]); } else { *port = vxlan->cfg.dst_port; } if (tb[NDA_VNI]) { - if (nla_len(tb[NDA_VNI]) != sizeof(u32)) + if (nla_len(tb[NDA_VNI]) != sizeof(u32)) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid vni"); return -EINVAL; + } *vni = cpu_to_be32(nla_get_u32(tb[NDA_VNI])); } else { *vni = vxlan->default_dst.remote_vni; } if (tb[NDA_SRC_VNI]) { - if (nla_len(tb[NDA_SRC_VNI]) != sizeof(u32)) + if (nla_len(tb[NDA_SRC_VNI]) != sizeof(u32)) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid src vni"); return -EINVAL; + } *src_vni = cpu_to_be32(nla_get_u32(tb[NDA_SRC_VNI])); } else { *src_vni = vxlan->default_dst.remote_vni; @@ -1183,12 +1195,16 @@ static int vxlan_fdb_parse(struct nlattr *tb[], struct vxlan_dev *vxlan, if (tb[NDA_IFINDEX]) { struct net_device *tdev; - if (nla_len(tb[NDA_IFINDEX]) != sizeof(u32)) + if (nla_len(tb[NDA_IFINDEX]) != sizeof(u32)) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid ifindex"); return -EINVAL; + } *ifindex = nla_get_u32(tb[NDA_IFINDEX]); tdev = __dev_get_by_index(net, *ifindex); - if (!tdev) + if (!tdev) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Device not found"); return -EADDRNOTAVAIL; + } } else { *ifindex = 0; } @@ -1226,7 +1242,7 @@ static int vxlan_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[], return -EINVAL; err = vxlan_fdb_parse(tb, vxlan, &ip, &port, &src_vni, &vni, &ifindex, - &nhid); + &nhid, extack); if (err) return err; @@ -1292,7 +1308,7 @@ static int vxlan_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[], int err; err = vxlan_fdb_parse(tb, vxlan, &ip, &port, &src_vni, &vni, &ifindex, - &nhid); + &nhid, extack); if (err) return err; -- 2.36.0
Jakub Kicinski
2022-May-09 22:46 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next v6 2/2] net: vxlan: Add extack support to vxlan_fdb_delete
On Thu, 5 May 2022 17:09:58 +0200 Alaa Mohamed wrote:> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, > + "DST, VNI, ifindex and port are mutually exclusive with NH_ID");This continuation line still does not align with the opening bracket. Look here if your email client makes it hard to see: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ac4b6c650b6519cc56baa32ef20415460a5aa8ee.1651762830.git.eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am at gmail.com/ Same story in patch 1:> static int ocelot_port_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[], > struct net_device *dev, > - const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid) > + const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)and here:> static int vxlan_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[], > struct net_device *dev, > - const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid) > + const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)