Oleksandr Mazur
2022-Feb-11 13:14 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH] net: bridge: multicast: notify switchdev driver whenever MC processing gets disabled
Whenever bridge driver hits the max capacity of MDBs, it disables the MC processing (by setting corresponding bridge option), but never notifies switchdev about such change (the notifiers are called only upon explicit setting of this option, through the registered netlink interface). This could lead to situation when Software MDB processing gets disabled, but this event never gets offloaded to the underlying Hardware. Fix this by adding a notify message in such case. Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Mazur <oleksandr.mazur at plvision.eu> --- net/bridge/br_multicast.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c index de2409889489..d53c08906bc8 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c @@ -82,6 +82,9 @@ static void br_multicast_find_del_pg(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port_group *pg); static void __br_multicast_stop(struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx); +static int br_mc_disabled_update(struct net_device *dev, bool value, + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack); + static struct net_bridge_port_group * br_sg_port_find(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port_group_sg_key *sg_p) @@ -1156,6 +1159,8 @@ struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *br_multicast_new_group(struct net_bridge *br, return mp; if (atomic_read(&br->mdb_hash_tbl.nelems) >= br->hash_max) { + err = br_mc_disabled_update(br->dev, false, NULL); + WARN_ON(err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP); br_opt_toggle(br, BROPT_MULTICAST_ENABLED, false); return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG); } -- 2.17.1
Jakub Kicinski
2022-Feb-15 05:13 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH] net: bridge: multicast: notify switchdev driver whenever MC processing gets disabled
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:14:26 +0200 Oleksandr Mazur wrote:> Whenever bridge driver hits the max capacity of MDBs, it disables > the MC processing (by setting corresponding bridge option), but never > notifies switchdev about such change (the notifiers are called only upon > explicit setting of this option, through the registered netlink interface). > > This could lead to situation when Software MDB processing gets disabled, > but this event never gets offloaded to the underlying Hardware. > > Fix this by adding a notify message in such case.Any comments on this one? We have drivers offloading mdb so presumably this should have a Fixes tag and go to net, right?
Ido Schimmel
2022-Feb-15 13:34 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH] net: bridge: multicast: notify switchdev driver whenever MC processing gets disabled
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 03:14:26PM +0200, Oleksandr Mazur wrote:> Whenever bridge driver hits the max capacity of MDBs, it disables > the MC processing (by setting corresponding bridge option), but never > notifies switchdev about such change (the notifiers are called only upon > explicit setting of this option, through the registered netlink interface). > > This could lead to situation when Software MDB processing gets disabled, > but this event never gets offloaded to the underlying Hardware. > > Fix this by adding a notify message in such case. > > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Mazur <oleksandr.mazur at plvision.eu> > --- > net/bridge/br_multicast.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c > index de2409889489..d53c08906bc8 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c > +++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c > @@ -82,6 +82,9 @@ static void br_multicast_find_del_pg(struct net_bridge *br, > struct net_bridge_port_group *pg); > static void __br_multicast_stop(struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx); > > +static int br_mc_disabled_update(struct net_device *dev, bool value, > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack); > + > static struct net_bridge_port_group * > br_sg_port_find(struct net_bridge *br, > struct net_bridge_port_group_sg_key *sg_p) > @@ -1156,6 +1159,8 @@ struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *br_multicast_new_group(struct net_bridge *br, > return mp; > > if (atomic_read(&br->mdb_hash_tbl.nelems) >= br->hash_max) { > + err = br_mc_disabled_update(br->dev, false, NULL); > + WARN_ON(err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP);What is the purpose of the WARN_ON()? There are a lot of operations that can fail in rollback paths, but we never WARN_ON() there I suggest: br_mc_disabled_update(br->dev, false, NULL);> br_opt_toggle(br, BROPT_MULTICAST_ENABLED, false); > return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG); > } > -- > 2.17.1 >