Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-Jul-31 16:26 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net] net: bridge: clear bridge's private skb space on xmit
We need to clear all of the bridge private skb variables as they can be stale due to the packet being recirculated through the stack and then transmitted through the bridge device. Similar memset is already done on bridge's input. We've seen cases where proxyarp_replied was 1 on routed multicast packets transmitted through the bridge to ports with neigh suppress which were getting dropped. Same thing can in theory happen with the port isolation bit as well. Fixes: 821f1b21cabb ("bridge: add new BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS port flag to suppress arp and nd flood") Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> --- net/bridge/br_device.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/bridge/br_device.c b/net/bridge/br_device.c index 8c7b78f8bc23..9a2fb4aa1a10 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_device.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_device.c @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ netdev_tx_t br_dev_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) const unsigned char *dest; u16 vid = 0; + memset(skb->cb, 0, sizeof(struct br_input_skb_cb)); + rcu_read_lock(); nf_ops = rcu_dereference(nf_br_ops); if (nf_ops && nf_ops->br_dev_xmit_hook(skb)) { -- 2.25.4
David Ahern
2020-Jul-31 17:27 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net] net: bridge: clear bridge's private skb space on xmit
On 7/31/20 10:26 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:> We need to clear all of the bridge private skb variables as they can be > stale due to the packet being recirculated through the stack and then > transmitted through the bridge device. Similar memset is already done on > bridge's input. We've seen cases where proxyarp_replied was 1 on routed > multicast packets transmitted through the bridge to ports with neigh > suppress which were getting dropped. Same thing can in theory happen with > the port isolation bit as well. > > Fixes: 821f1b21cabb ("bridge: add new BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS port flag to suppress arp and nd flood") > Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> > --- > net/bridge/br_device.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_device.c b/net/bridge/br_device.c > index 8c7b78f8bc23..9a2fb4aa1a10 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_device.c > +++ b/net/bridge/br_device.c > @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ netdev_tx_t br_dev_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) > const unsigned char *dest; > u16 vid = 0; > > + memset(skb->cb, 0, sizeof(struct br_input_skb_cb)); > + > rcu_read_lock(); > nf_ops = rcu_dereference(nf_br_ops); > if (nf_ops && nf_ops->br_dev_xmit_hook(skb)) { >What's the performance hit of doing this on every packet? Can you just set a flag that tells the code to reset on recirculation? Seems like br_input_skb_cb has space for that.
David Miller
2020-Aug-03 22:27 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net] net: bridge: clear bridge's private skb space on xmit
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 19:26:16 +0300> We need to clear all of the bridge private skb variables as they can be > stale due to the packet being recirculated through the stack and then > transmitted through the bridge device. Similar memset is already done on > bridge's input. We've seen cases where proxyarp_replied was 1 on routed > multicast packets transmitted through the bridge to ports with neigh > suppress which were getting dropped. Same thing can in theory happen with > the port isolation bit as well. > > Fixes: 821f1b21cabb ("bridge: add new BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS port flag to suppress arp and nd flood") > Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com>Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.