Linux Ethernet Bridging - Jun 2020 - [Bridge] [PATCH net v2 0/2] bridge: mrp: Update MRP_PORT_ROLE

From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur at microchip.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:05:39 +0200
> This patch series does the following:
> - fixes the enum br_mrp_port_role_type. It removes the port role none(0x2)
>   because this is in conflict with the standard. The standard defines the
>   interconnect port role as value 0x2.
> - adds checks regarding current defined port roles: primary(0x0) and
>   secondary(0x1).
> 
> v2:
>  - add the validation code when setting the port role.
Series applied, thank you.

The 06/23/2020 14:38, David Miller wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
content is safe
> 
> From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur at microchip.com>
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:05:39 +0200
> 
> > This patch series does the following:
> > - fixes the enum br_mrp_port_role_type. It removes the port role
none(0x2)
> >   because this is in conflict with the standard. The standard defines
the
> >   interconnect port role as value 0x2.
> > - adds checks regarding current defined port roles: primary(0x0) and
> >   secondary(0x1).
> >
> > v2:
> >  - add the validation code when setting the port role.
> 
> Series applied, thank you.
Thanks. Will these patches be applied also on net-next?
Because if I start now to add support for the interconnect port, these
patches are needed on net-next. Or do I need to add these patches to the
patch series for the interconnect port?
What is the correct way of doing this?

-- 
/Horatiu