Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-May-21 08:16 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH 1/3] bridge: mrp: Add br_mrp_unique_ifindex function
On 20/05/2020 16:09, Horatiu Vultur wrote:> It is not allow to have the same net bridge port part of multiple MRP > rings. Therefore add a check if the port is used already in a different > MRP. In that case return failure. > > Fixes: 9a9f26e8f7ea ("bridge: mrp: Connect MRP API with the switchdev API") > Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur at microchip.com> > --- > net/bridge/br_mrp.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_mrp.c b/net/bridge/br_mrp.c > index d7bc09de4c139..a5a3fa59c078a 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_mrp.c > +++ b/net/bridge/br_mrp.c > @@ -37,6 +37,32 @@ static struct br_mrp *br_mrp_find_id(struct net_bridge *br, u32 ring_id) > return res; > } > > +static bool br_mrp_unique_ifindex(struct net_bridge *br, u32 ifindex) > +{ > + struct br_mrp *mrp; > + bool res = true; > + > + rcu_read_lock();Why do you need the rcu_read_lock() here when lockdep_rtnl_is_held() is used? You should be able to just do rtnl_dereference() below as this is used only under rtnl.> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(mrp, &br->mrp_list, list, > + lockdep_rtnl_is_held()) { > + struct net_bridge_port *p; > + > + p = rcu_dereference(mrp->p_port); > + if (p && p->dev->ifindex == ifindex) { > + res = false; > + break; > + } > + > + p = rcu_dereference(mrp->s_port); > + if (p && p->dev->ifindex == ifindex) { > + res = false; > + break; > + } > + } > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + return res; > +} > + > static struct br_mrp *br_mrp_find_port(struct net_bridge *br, > struct net_bridge_port *p) > { > @@ -255,6 +281,11 @@ int br_mrp_add(struct net_bridge *br, struct br_mrp_instance *instance) > !br_mrp_get_port(br, instance->s_ifindex)) > return -EINVAL; > > + /* It is not possible to have the same port part of multiple rings */ > + if (!br_mrp_unique_ifindex(br, instance->p_ifindex) || > + !br_mrp_unique_ifindex(br, instance->s_ifindex)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > mrp = kzalloc(sizeof(*mrp), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!mrp) > return -ENOMEM; >
Horatiu Vultur
2020-May-21 18:49 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH 1/3] bridge: mrp: Add br_mrp_unique_ifindex function
The 05/21/2020 11:16, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:> On 20/05/2020 16:09, Horatiu Vultur wrote: > > It is not allow to have the same net bridge port part of multiple MRP > > rings. Therefore add a check if the port is used already in a different > > MRP. In that case return failure. > > > > Fixes: 9a9f26e8f7ea ("bridge: mrp: Connect MRP API with the switchdev API") > > Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur at microchip.com> > > --- > > net/bridge/br_mrp.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_mrp.c b/net/bridge/br_mrp.c > > index d7bc09de4c139..a5a3fa59c078a 100644 > > --- a/net/bridge/br_mrp.c > > +++ b/net/bridge/br_mrp.c > > @@ -37,6 +37,32 @@ static struct br_mrp *br_mrp_find_id(struct net_bridge *br, u32 ring_id) > > return res; > > } > > > > +static bool br_mrp_unique_ifindex(struct net_bridge *br, u32 ifindex) > > +{ > > + struct br_mrp *mrp; > > + bool res = true; > > + > > + rcu_read_lock(); > > Why do you need the rcu_read_lock() here when lockdep_rtnl_is_held() is used? > You should be able to just do rtnl_dereference() below as this is used only > under rtnl.Hi Nik, Also initially I thought that is not needed, but when I enabled all the RCU debug configs to see if I use correctly the RCU, I got a warning regarding suspicious RCU usage. And that is the reason why I have put it.> > > + list_for_each_entry_rcu(mrp, &br->mrp_list, list, > > + lockdep_rtnl_is_held()) { > > + struct net_bridge_port *p; > > + > > + p = rcu_dereference(mrp->p_port); > > + if (p && p->dev->ifindex == ifindex) { > > + res = false; > > + break; > > + } > > + > > + p = rcu_dereference(mrp->s_port); > > + if (p && p->dev->ifindex == ifindex) { > > + res = false; > > + break; > > + } > > + } > > + rcu_read_unlock(); > > + return res; > > +} > > + > > static struct br_mrp *br_mrp_find_port(struct net_bridge *br, > > struct net_bridge_port *p) > > { > > @@ -255,6 +281,11 @@ int br_mrp_add(struct net_bridge *br, struct br_mrp_instance *instance) > > !br_mrp_get_port(br, instance->s_ifindex)) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > + /* It is not possible to have the same port part of multiple rings */ > > + if (!br_mrp_unique_ifindex(br, instance->p_ifindex) || > > + !br_mrp_unique_ifindex(br, instance->s_ifindex)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > mrp = kzalloc(sizeof(*mrp), GFP_KERNEL); > > if (!mrp) > > return -ENOMEM; > > >-- /Horatiu