Linus Lüssing
2017-Dec-04 04:53 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next] bridge: ebtables: Avoid resetting limit rule state
Hi Pablo, Thanks for your reply! On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:30:08AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:> [...] > > diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_limit.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_limit.c > > index 61a9f1be1263..f74b48633feb 100644 > > --- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_limit.c > > +++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_limit.c > > @@ -69,6 +69,10 @@ static int ebt_limit_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par) > > { > > struct ebt_limit_info *info = par->matchinfo; > > > > + /* Do not reset state on unrelated table changes */ > > + if (info->prev) > > + return 0; > > What kernel version are you using? I suspect you don't have this > applied?I'm indeed using a 4.4.102 kernel, as LEDE is still in the process of updating to 4.14. So 4.4 with LEDE is where I got the measurement results from.> > commit ec23189049651b16dc2ffab35a4371dc1f491aca > Author: Willem de Bruijn <willemb at google.com> > Date: Mon Jan 2 17:19:46 2017 -0500 > > xtables: extend matches and targets with .usersizeAnd so, no I do not have this patch. I looked at it now, but it does not seem to have any relation with .matchinfo, does it? I also had a quick look at a 4.15-rc1 kernel in a VM now. I still end up in ebt_limit_mt_check() with the variables being reset when editing the table somewhere. Regards, Linus
Linus Lüssing
2017-Dec-04 05:20 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next] bridge: ebtables: Avoid resetting limit rule state
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:53:35AM +0100, Linus L?ssing wrote:> And so, no I do not have this patch. I looked at it now, but it > does not seem to have any relation with .matchinfo, does it?Relation between .usersize and .checkentry I ment, not .usersize and .matchinfo.
Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-Dec-07 00:26 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH net-next] bridge: ebtables: Avoid resetting limit rule state
Hi Linus, On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:53:35AM +0100, Linus L?ssing wrote:> Hi Pablo, > > Thanks for your reply! > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:30:08AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > [...] > > > diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_limit.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_limit.c > > > index 61a9f1be1263..f74b48633feb 100644 > > > --- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_limit.c > > > +++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_limit.c > > > @@ -69,6 +69,10 @@ static int ebt_limit_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par) > > > { > > > struct ebt_limit_info *info = par->matchinfo; > > > > > > + /* Do not reset state on unrelated table changes */ > > > + if (info->prev) > > > + return 0; > > > > What kernel version are you using? I suspect you don't have this > > applied? > > I'm indeed using a 4.4.102 kernel, as LEDE is still in the process > of updating to 4.14. So 4.4 with LEDE is where I got the measurement > results from. > > > > > commit ec23189049651b16dc2ffab35a4371dc1f491aca > > Author: Willem de Bruijn <willemb at google.com> > > Date: Mon Jan 2 17:19:46 2017 -0500 > > > > xtables: extend matches and targets with .usersize > > And so, no I do not have this patch. I looked at it now, but it > does not seem to have any relation with .matchinfo, does it? > > I also had a quick look at a 4.15-rc1 kernel in a VM now. I still > end up in ebt_limit_mt_check() with the variables being reset > when editing the table somewhere.My question is if your fix would work with 4.15-rc1.