Xin Long
2016-Apr-05 03:32 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCHv2 net-next 2/6] bridge: simplify the forward_delay_store by calling store_bridge_parm
There are some repetitive codes in forward_delay_store, we can remove them by calling store_bridge_parm. Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin at gmail.com> --- net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c | 27 ++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c index c48f6b0..137cd3b 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c @@ -160,29 +160,22 @@ static ssize_t group_fwd_mask_show(struct device *d, return sprintf(buf, "%#x\n", br->group_fwd_mask); } - -static ssize_t group_fwd_mask_store(struct device *d, - struct device_attribute *attr, - const char *buf, - size_t len) +static int set_group_fwd_mask(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val) { - struct net_bridge *br = to_bridge(d); - char *endp; - unsigned long val; - - if (!ns_capable(dev_net(br->dev)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN)) - return -EPERM; - - val = simple_strtoul(buf, &endp, 0); - if (endp == buf) - return -EINVAL; - if (val & BR_GROUPFWD_RESTRICTED) return -EINVAL; br->group_fwd_mask = val; - return len; + return 0; +} + +static ssize_t group_fwd_mask_store(struct device *d, + struct device_attribute *attr, + const char *buf, + size_t len) +{ + return store_bridge_parm(d, buf, len, set_group_fwd_mask); } static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(group_fwd_mask); -- 2.1.0
Xin Long
2016-Apr-05 03:32 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCHv2 net-next 3/6] bridge: simplify the stp_state_store by calling store_bridge_parm
There are some repetitive codes in stp_state_store, we can remove them by calling store_bridge_parm. Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin at gmail.com> --- net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c | 24 +++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c index 137cd3b..9918763 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c @@ -128,27 +128,17 @@ static ssize_t stp_state_show(struct device *d, } +static int set_stp_state(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val) +{ + br_stp_set_enabled(br, val); + return 0; +} + static ssize_t stp_state_store(struct device *d, struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t len) { - struct net_bridge *br = to_bridge(d); - char *endp; - unsigned long val; - - if (!ns_capable(dev_net(br->dev)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN)) - return -EPERM; - - val = simple_strtoul(buf, &endp, 0); - if (endp == buf) - return -EINVAL; - - if (!rtnl_trylock()) - return restart_syscall(); - br_stp_set_enabled(br, val); - rtnl_unlock(); - - return len; + return store_bridge_parm(d, buf, len, set_stp_state); } static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(stp_state); -- 2.1.0
Toshiaki Makita
2016-Apr-05 05:08 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCHv2 net-next 3/6] bridge: simplify the stp_state_store by calling store_bridge_parm
On 2016/04/05 12:32, Xin Long wrote:> There are some repetitive codes in stp_state_store, we can remove > them by calling store_bridge_parm. > > Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin at gmail.com> > --- > net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c | 24 +++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c > index 137cd3b..9918763 100644 > --- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c > +++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c > @@ -128,27 +128,17 @@ static ssize_t stp_state_show(struct device *d, > } > > > +static int set_stp_state(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val) > +{You forgot to add rtnl lock here? The missing lock is restored in patch 4, but at this point bisect could break..> + br_stp_set_enabled(br, val); > + return 0; > +}Toshiaki Makita