Antonio Quartulli
2013-Sep-26 22:01 UTC
[Bridge] [RFC net] bridge: clean the nf_bridge status when forwarding the skb
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 02:32:48PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:> > > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_forward.c b/net/bridge/br_forward.c > > > > index 4b81b14..65864bc 100644 > > > > --- a/net/bridge/br_forward.c > > > > +++ b/net/bridge/br_forward.c > > > > @@ -49,6 +49,11 @@ int br_dev_queue_push_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb) > > > > } else { > > > > skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN); > > > > br_drop_fake_rtable(skb); > > > > + > > > > + /* clean the NF bridge data */ > > > > + nf_bridge_put(skb->nf_bridge); > > > > + skb->nf_bridge = NULL; > > > > + > > > > dev_queue_xmit(skb); > > > > } > > > > > > > > Regarding CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER you are right, thanks. > > > > > > > > I think the header will also be garbage if bridge on bridge with netfilter is used. > > > See nf_bridge_save_header. > > > > What header are you referring to? nf_bridge_save_header() saves the header in > > skb->nf_bridge->data, which is freed during nf_bridge_put() (assuming > > ->use reached 0). > > > > > > If bridge is stacked the original ether header will get overwritten by the second > call to save_header.Sorry, but I am not getting what you mean (I am new to the code and it is late here..): save_header() will store the Ethernet header in nf_bridge->data for later recover (if needed). By freeing nf_bridge I also destroy this header copy. When the skb enters the second bridge, save_header() will save again the header in nf_bridge->data. But I don't see how this can create a problem. The problem I had before this patch comes from the fact that nf_bridge_copy_header() is invoked in the second bridge with the nf_bridge state of the first. This was overwriting my the packet Ethernet header with what the first invocation of save_header() stored in nf_bridge->data. But by unsetting nf_bridge I think I am preventing this from happening again. no? -- Antonio Quartulli -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20130927/03860ae4/attachment-0001.sig>
Antonio Quartulli
2013-Oct-14 22:20 UTC
[Bridge] [RFC net] bridge: clean the nf_bridge status when forwarding the skb
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:01:43AM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote:> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 02:32:48PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_forward.c b/net/bridge/br_forward.c > > > > > index 4b81b14..65864bc 100644 > > > > > --- a/net/bridge/br_forward.c > > > > > +++ b/net/bridge/br_forward.c > > > > > @@ -49,6 +49,11 @@ int br_dev_queue_push_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb) > > > > > } else { > > > > > skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN); > > > > > br_drop_fake_rtable(skb); > > > > > + > > > > > + /* clean the NF bridge data */ > > > > > + nf_bridge_put(skb->nf_bridge); > > > > > + skb->nf_bridge = NULL; > > > > > + > > > > > dev_queue_xmit(skb); > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER you are right, thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > I think the header will also be garbage if bridge on bridge with netfilter is used. > > > > See nf_bridge_save_header. > > > > > > What header are you referring to? nf_bridge_save_header() saves the header in > > > skb->nf_bridge->data, which is freed during nf_bridge_put() (assuming > > > ->use reached 0). > > > > > > > > > > If bridge is stacked the original ether header will get overwritten by the second > > call to save_header. > > Sorry, but I am not getting what you mean (I am new to the code and it is late here..): > save_header() will store the Ethernet header in nf_bridge->data for > later recover (if needed). > > By freeing nf_bridge I also destroy this header copy. > > When the skb enters the second bridge, save_header() will save again the header > in nf_bridge->data. But I don't see how this can create a problem. > > The problem I had before this patch comes from the fact that > nf_bridge_copy_header() is invoked in the second bridge with the nf_bridge state > of the first. This was overwriting my the packet Ethernet header with what the > first invocation of save_header() stored in nf_bridge->data. > > But by unsetting nf_bridge I think I am preventing this from happening again. > no?Hello Stephen, do you have other comments about this patch? I know it is rather difficult that a generic user hits this issue, but I'd like to see it fixed because other people using batman-adv may incur in this problem. Cheers, -- Antonio Quartulli -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20131015/10f1dccb/attachment-0001.sig>
Stephen Hemminger
2013-Oct-14 22:27 UTC
Re: [RFC net] bridge: clean the nf_bridge status when forwarding the skb
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 00:20:10 +0200 Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding.com> wrote:> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:01:43AM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 02:32:48PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_forward.c b/net/bridge/br_forward.c > > > > > > index 4b81b14..65864bc 100644 > > > > > > --- a/net/bridge/br_forward.c > > > > > > +++ b/net/bridge/br_forward.c > > > > > > @@ -49,6 +49,11 @@ int br_dev_queue_push_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb) > > > > > > } else { > > > > > > skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN); > > > > > > br_drop_fake_rtable(skb); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + /* clean the NF bridge data */ > > > > > > + nf_bridge_put(skb->nf_bridge); > > > > > > + skb->nf_bridge = NULL; > > > > > > + > > > > > > dev_queue_xmit(skb); > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER you are right, thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the header will also be garbage if bridge on bridge with netfilter is used. > > > > > See nf_bridge_save_header. > > > > > > > > What header are you referring to? nf_bridge_save_header() saves the header in > > > > skb->nf_bridge->data, which is freed during nf_bridge_put() (assuming > > > > ->use reached 0). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If bridge is stacked the original ether header will get overwritten by the second > > > call to save_header. > > > > Sorry, but I am not getting what you mean (I am new to the code and it is late here..): > > save_header() will store the Ethernet header in nf_bridge->data for > > later recover (if needed). > > > > By freeing nf_bridge I also destroy this header copy. > > > > When the skb enters the second bridge, save_header() will save again the header > > in nf_bridge->data. But I don''t see how this can create a problem. > > > > The problem I had before this patch comes from the fact that > > nf_bridge_copy_header() is invoked in the second bridge with the nf_bridge state > > of the first. This was overwriting my the packet Ethernet header with what the > > first invocation of save_header() stored in nf_bridge->data. > > > > But by unsetting nf_bridge I think I am preventing this from happening again. > > no? > > Hello Stephen, > > do you have other comments about this patch? I know it is rather difficult that > a generic user hits this issue, but I''d like to see it fixed because other > people using batman-adv may incur in this problem. > > Cheers, > >The patch content is fine, but it needs necessary ifdef''s. I would also prefer to have the clean done as a function that can be stubbed out like the other bridge netfilter stuff.
Stephen Hemminger
2013-Oct-14 22:27 UTC
[Bridge] [RFC net] bridge: clean the nf_bridge status when forwarding the skb
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 00:20:10 +0200 Antonio Quartulli <antonio at meshcoding.com> wrote:> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:01:43AM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 02:32:48PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_forward.c b/net/bridge/br_forward.c > > > > > > index 4b81b14..65864bc 100644 > > > > > > --- a/net/bridge/br_forward.c > > > > > > +++ b/net/bridge/br_forward.c > > > > > > @@ -49,6 +49,11 @@ int br_dev_queue_push_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb) > > > > > > } else { > > > > > > skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN); > > > > > > br_drop_fake_rtable(skb); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + /* clean the NF bridge data */ > > > > > > + nf_bridge_put(skb->nf_bridge); > > > > > > + skb->nf_bridge = NULL; > > > > > > + > > > > > > dev_queue_xmit(skb); > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER you are right, thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the header will also be garbage if bridge on bridge with netfilter is used. > > > > > See nf_bridge_save_header. > > > > > > > > What header are you referring to? nf_bridge_save_header() saves the header in > > > > skb->nf_bridge->data, which is freed during nf_bridge_put() (assuming > > > > ->use reached 0). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If bridge is stacked the original ether header will get overwritten by the second > > > call to save_header. > > > > Sorry, but I am not getting what you mean (I am new to the code and it is late here..): > > save_header() will store the Ethernet header in nf_bridge->data for > > later recover (if needed). > > > > By freeing nf_bridge I also destroy this header copy. > > > > When the skb enters the second bridge, save_header() will save again the header > > in nf_bridge->data. But I don't see how this can create a problem. > > > > The problem I had before this patch comes from the fact that > > nf_bridge_copy_header() is invoked in the second bridge with the nf_bridge state > > of the first. This was overwriting my the packet Ethernet header with what the > > first invocation of save_header() stored in nf_bridge->data. > > > > But by unsetting nf_bridge I think I am preventing this from happening again. > > no? > > Hello Stephen, > > do you have other comments about this patch? I know it is rather difficult that > a generic user hits this issue, but I'd like to see it fixed because other > people using batman-adv may incur in this problem. > > Cheers, > >The patch content is fine, but it needs necessary ifdef's. I would also prefer to have the clean done as a function that can be stubbed out like the other bridge netfilter stuff.