richardvoigt@gmail.com
2007-Jul-05 17:02 UTC
[Bridge] jumpstart stp port to forwarding state
Sorry if this is a dupe, but the mailing list join email got delayed by 10 or 12 hours and so I think this message wasn't accepted: ---------------- I've googled for this, but since there are so many pages talking about linux boxes connected to CIsco equipment, I can't find anything relevant. Does linux bridging support anything like cisco's portfast (port starts in forwarding state)? Is there a way (sysfs, ioctl) to at least change a port to forwarding immediately? Even bridges with stp disabled take some time bringing ports up after a topology change. If the delay can't be eliminated, can I wait for it somehow in my startup scripts to avoid initial connection failures? My preference would be to have something like: brctl portfast br0 bond0.10 on or brctl initialstate br0 bond0.10 forwarding Also, can stp disable all ports in the same bridge? I would assume not, a minimum spanning tree needs at least one port forwarding (could that port somehow be a different interface on the same box, not a member of the bridge?). If at least one port is always forwarding, could the minimum cost port be set to forwarding by default when the bridge is brought up (ip link set br0 up) irrespective of any portfast-alike setting? I'm trying to minimize startup time on a firewall. Thanks for any information you can provide. Ben Voigt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20070705/8b449d9b/attachment.htm
brctl setfd br0 0 Sets the forwarding delay on the bridge to 0, making it forward immediately, instead of going into 'learning' mode. This affects the entire bridge, not just a single port. Regards, Leigh Leigh Sharpe Network Systems Engineer Pacific Wireless Ph +61 3 9584 8966 Mob 0408 009 502 Helpdesk 1300 300 616 email lsharpe@pacificwireless.com.au web www.pacificwireless.com.au _____ From: richardvoigt@gmail.com [mailto:richardvoigt@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 10:03 AM To: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: [Bridge] jumpstart stp port to forwarding state Sorry if this is a dupe, but the mailing list join email got delayed by 10 or 12 hours and so I think this message wasn't accepted: ---------------- I've googled for this, but since there are so many pages talking about linux boxes connected to CIsco equipment, I can't find anything relevant. Does linux bridging support anything like cisco's portfast (port starts in forwarding state)? Is there a way (sysfs, ioctl) to at least change a port to forwarding immediately? Even bridges with stp disabled take some time bringing ports up after a topology change. If the delay can't be eliminated, can I wait for it somehow in my startup scripts to avoid initial connection failures? My preference would be to have something like: brctl portfast br0 bond0.10 on or brctl initialstate br0 bond0.10 forwarding Also, can stp disable all ports in the same bridge? I would assume not, a minimum spanning tree needs at least one port forwarding (could that port somehow be a different interface on the same box, not a member of the bridge?). If at least one port is always forwarding, could the minimum cost port be set to forwarding by default when the bridge is brought up (ip link set br0 up) irrespective of any portfast-alike setting? I'm trying to minimize startup time on a firewall. Thanks for any information you can provide. Ben Voigt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20070706/570b5ed7/attachment.htm