Hello, I'm connecting from an older thinclient to a Centos7 server with>X :1 -query centos7.domainand get the warning::>xdmcp-server.c > default: > g_warning ("Got unexpected XDMCP packet %d", packet->opcode);and my thinclient aborts. after reading the source, I came to the conclusion, that lighdm does not implement "XDMCP_ForwardQuery". Is there a reason why it was not implemented? regards, Martin
Yeah, we should implement that [1]. I think I didn't implement it initially as the protocol is quite unclear here and I wasn't sure if it was still used. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1511545 On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 at 05:08 Martin Vogt <martin.vogt at itwm.fraunhofer.de> wrote:> > > Hello, > > I'm connecting from an older thinclient to a Centos7 server with > > >X :1 -query centos7.domain > > and get the warning:: > > >xdmcp-server.c > > default: > > g_warning ("Got unexpected XDMCP packet %d", packet->opcode); > > and my thinclient aborts. > > after reading the source, I came to the conclusion, that lighdm does not > implement "XDMCP_ForwardQuery". > > Is there a reason why it was not implemented? > > regards, > > Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > LightDM mailing list > LightDM at lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/lightdm >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/lightdm/attachments/20151029/385c085f/attachment.html>
Could you try lp:~robert-ancell/lightdm/xdmcp-forward-query and see if that works for you? Thanks, --Robert On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 at 05:08 Martin Vogt <martin.vogt at itwm.fraunhofer.de> wrote:> > > Hello, > > I'm connecting from an older thinclient to a Centos7 server with > > >X :1 -query centos7.domain > > and get the warning:: > > >xdmcp-server.c > > default: > > g_warning ("Got unexpected XDMCP packet %d", packet->opcode); > > and my thinclient aborts. > > after reading the source, I came to the conclusion, that lighdm does not > implement "XDMCP_ForwardQuery". > > Is there a reason why it was not implemented? > > regards, > > Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > LightDM mailing list > LightDM at lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/lightdm >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/lightdm/attachments/20151029/76970941/attachment.html>