Mauricio Tavares
2014-Jan-03 07:52 UTC
[libvirt-users] [libvirt] [RFC] Implementing ftrace support for libvirt
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 6:46 AM, yuxh <yuxinghai at cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:> Hi all, > > Happy new year! > > The existing trace mechanism in libvirt is dtrace. Although the dtrace > can work, it's not work well enough. Every time we want get information > from the trace point we must write a systemtap script and run it > together with libvirt. > > That's really unpractical on some occasion, especially on production > server since the systemtap script can't be executed automatically. > And some problems may be not easy to reproduce, then it will cost a > lot of time to get the trace information again. > > So I think it is essential to add supporting for record the trace > information automatically in libvirt to satisfy the user's requirement. > That's why I'm currently implementing ftrace support in libvirt. > > How do you think about my idea? Any comment will be appreciated! >How hard/painless it would be to implement it? And, can you have both and then select which one to use?> Thanks, > Yu > > -- > libvir-list mailing list > libvir-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Apparently Analagous Threads
- profiling KVM i/o on CentOS 5
- [PATCH v3 21/27] x86/ftrace: Adapt function tracing for PIE support
- [PATCH v2 21/27] x86/ftrace: Adapt function tracing for PIE support
- [PATCH v3 21/27] x86/ftrace: Adapt function tracing for PIE support
- [PATCH v2 0/6] use canonical ftrace path whenever possible